SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Wingsfannnnn91

Membre depuis
22 juin 2024
Messages dans les forums
84
Messages par jour
6.5
Forum: Armchair-GM26 juin à 16 h 53
Sujet: Because nothing yzermans done has made sense
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMBL</b></div><div>Sharks don't have any retention spots left, so that or something like it won't be happening. I'm sure there would have been teams willing to give a 7th, but why would you want to send him to a team that is within division for example or one that is competing for a measly 7th? He sent him to the worst bad team in the other conference, in terms of current roster and future outlook, which is essentially the best case scenario for a dump. As of now, losing the 2nd RD pick that they didn't have a week ago doesn't matter. What he does with the cap space absolutely does matter because that will determine if he dumped Walman (and I guess Gibson) for no reason. If dumping Walman turns out to be a bad decision then losing the pick just amplifies the severity of the situation, but it's not like if he had gotten a 7th or a even a 2nd that would make a bad situation good, it would just make it not as bad.</div></div>

Not just for a measley 7th your also retaining the 2nd you sent. I don’t care if it’s the leafs I’d much rather have done walman for a 7th. Doesn’t matter that we didn’t have the 2nd last week we gave one up to move someone we didn’t need to use it on. Wasn’t even a holl for example ... end of the day t desnt make much sense. Had heard somewhere maybe Sj would claim holl on waivers cause Sj are on his no trade list but it would have happened by now

This trade was a big fail by Yzerman
Forum: Armchair-GM25 juin à 15 h 47
Forum: Armchair-GM25 juin à 14 h 48
Sujet: Big trade coming
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PuzzledActuary</b></div><div>Why doesn't it make sense? It's another 2nd rounder for an asset we will likely never use or need.</div></div>

Gibson had a good season and he’s a right handed dman who are always in demand. Why would we deal him for another 2nd? I always expected him to be moved as a trade chip after the season he had with seider and pelikka cementing themselves likely as core guys on the right side for a long time and there’s always the chance to get a pesce/Roy or someone else or a trade but I didn’t think we’d just move him for a pick

Gotta think he’s moving that pick in a trade or maybe it’s just as simple as moving a 2nd and a 3rd or something to move up from 15 to 8-10 in the draft or moving 47&amp;53 for a team like dallas’s 29th pick (who only draft again n the 5th round)

I’d just be shocked if they went into the weekend picking 15 47 and 53. Somethings happening
Forum: Armchair-GM24 juin à 20 h 15
Sujet: Gibson and Zegras
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buffbry</b></div><div>I like gibson, but not even close to 15th. 2nd with retention or 2nd and they take back holl and husso</div></div>

Ya I’m not giving up a 1st for Gibson. I’d say husso going back they’d have zero interest in holl, maybe husso bounces back in the west... Gibson is a risk but maybe he can be a decent tandem with Lyon for a year then with Cossa and he can bounce back to at least be around 905% ... just seen ullmark dealt to bruins so I’m glad Yzerman won’t fall for that trap and I’m actually surprised at what the sens only gave up for him 😂

They’ll be stuck with him till he’s 36-37 ... anyways Gibson would be my target or someone who can play around 40 games , Lyons proven he can play good he was just handed way too many games
Forum: Armchair-GM24 juin à 0 h 29
Sujet: Ullmark
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FriendlyGhost</b></div><div>"Gibson is bad because Anaheim's defense sucks" isn't a great justification for grabbing him considering our defense sucks too.

As for the draft, it's pretty rancid this year. Detroit would almost be farther ahead to trade up and get in the upper tier or trade down and grab another asset and still pick in the same tier of players.

Honestly, I'd trade 15 for McGroarty straight up in a heart beat.</div></div>

Like I said none of these goalies will do anything if we bring back the same d core. Look at the bruins roster and ours ? Ullmark wouldn’t change anything and would likely have t be kept for 6 years instead of 3 for Gibson.

I think we can get someone good at 15 with all the dmen selected prior. If anything we can always move from 15 to 12 for like an eiserman. I know a lot of ppl complain he sucks and will be the next zadina but I don’t think every goal scorer is destined to fail and I think a potential line of eiserman larkin raymond could be a great one.

Connelly has huge upside and I’d take him if he’s there, what’s the point of drafting these locker room leaders like kasper danielson etc.. if we can’t surround someone like Connelly with these guys to help him. He’s still 17 not a 30 year old with no hope of turning things around . What if catton drops? .. think someone good can be there . Like mcgroarty but rather deal the 2025 first top 10 protected obviously ... with our luck he wants to only play in Detroit and the jets will have no leverage
Forum: Armchair-GM23 juin à 23 h 54
Sujet: Ullmark
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jfstompers</b></div><div>I don't get the love for gibson.Gibson costs 6.4 for 3 more years might as well get ullmark he's just better. Cossa is a great prospect but until he's here and looks the part you can't just assume especially with a goalie.</div></div>

It’s not love for Gibson I just rather pay the lesser cost and have him for only 3 years . Ullmark will probably want another 5 years which means we’d have him till 36. Ullmark has always been a tandem goalie and never #1. Gibson has been on a bad ducks team last few years ... yes we can never assume with goalies but we spent a 15th pick + extra assets to move up to get him , why waste another 1st + for another guy when Cossa is a year off?

Sorry got zero interest in trading a top 15 pick ++ and extending a tandem guy till he’s 36 . Let’s not forget bruins team is a lot better than ours. I think our main goal should be fixing that d core. Whoever’s in nets will fail otherwise