PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
WN88
Membre depuis
2 sept. 2020
Messages dans les forums
802
Messages par jour
0.6
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 23 h 32
Sujet:
Spurgeon
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Digitalbooya06</b></div><div>What does this even mean? I’d trade Spurgeon for one year of Marner.</div></div>
Meant "for Marner", but I can't envision Wild fans would want to give up Rossi and a 1st in addition to Spurgeon, which is what Toronto would (at least) want.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 23 h 31
Sujet:
Spurgeon
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>StutzlesNumber1Fan</b></div><div>Idk, he's 34 and had a season ending hip injury lol. I think Roy, Pesce, Montour etc all would cost less money and not require any picks while also being younger.</div></div>
realistically, you're prob right. just messing around with this idea.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 22 h 29
Sujet:
Spurgeon
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leafboy101</b></div><div>As a Leafs fan I would love Jared Spurgeon, he’s underrated and can move the puck decently as well….although that contract will age horribly and we are over cap in this scenario, kampf wont be on LTIR so this would be a move only if say Marner or Tavares got moved and I just don’t see it happening unfortunately</div></div>
I just placed Kampf in LTIR because I think his cap is easy to dump, and he's a pretty obvious candidate to be replaced with Minten coming in. I just don't want a bunch of Ducks fans yelling at me in the comments about why they wouldn't give up a 26' 7th for him or something like that. If the cap is what you're worried about in this scenario, I think it's easily solved by trading Lilly and/or signing a cheaper D-man than Tanev. Either way, very doable.
I also don't think the contract will age horribly. Obviously, we'd have to see how the injury would affect his play, but I'm definitely not too worried about his age. Many elite D-men have shown it's possible to stay at that level. It's also only 3 years. Even if he gives us 2 years of elite play, that's a win.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 22 h 24
Sujet:
Spurgeon
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>StutzlesNumber1Fan</b></div><div>I feel like youre better off just offering that big ass deal to a free agent and keeping the 1st lol.</div></div>
Debatable. Firstly, there isn't a single player in FA that is nearly as good as Spurgeon. I also think that the fact he only has 3 years left is a major benefit. Any contract that's given in FA will have to have a good amount of term, too.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 22 h 23
Sujet:
Spurgeon
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bee</b></div><div>Maybe instead of 1st trade Marner for Spurgeon and more</div></div>
Nah. Most Wild fans seem pretty reluctant to give up anything of value for Spurgeon.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 12 h 21
Sujet:
Worst off-season possible
This team should run it back and wait for Tavares to leave. Trading Marner would be the equivalent of signing Tavares 7 years ago.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 12 h 20
Sujet:
Worst off-season possible
If you want to trace it to one move, it was the Tavares deal. Completely messed up the structure of the team on the ice and in the cap. Put insurmountable “win-now” pressure on a bunch of 20 year olds that weren’t ready. Worst part is we already had Nazem Kadri, who won a cup as a 2C. Not to mention we traded him for practically nothing.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 12 h 17
Sujet:
Post JT-Marner Deals
I think this ACGM is a perfect depiction of why “more cap flexibility” doesn’t necessarily equal a better, in any way.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 12 h 16
Sujet:
Post JT-Marner Deals
Personally, I would trade Myers and Konecny for Marner.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 12 h 12
Sujet:
2 sides of a Marner trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>iAce</b></div><div>You aren't getting much for Mitch, lets be honest. He's shown to fade in the playoffs, he is going to want a raise and a team has to extend him before he even plays a game otherwise he could walk. I've listened to the SDPN a ton and they all agree you would be glad to get out of that contract. I'm not saying you get future considerations, but you aren't getting a Faber, Rossi and a 1st for him. And the teams that can afford to acquire him aren't going to give up their futures for him. I don't even want him on the Wild period, let alone giving up Faber, Rossi and 1sts that you are thinking. We have our own players that haven't shown up in the playoffs we don't need to add to the list.</div></div>
I don’t listen to the SDPN, so not sure what points they made. If you feel that it’s not worth it to acquire Marner, that’s fine and I totally respect that opinion from other fans. But there’s this ongoing notion among the fanbase that the Leafs would benefit from simply having the extra cap space involved in the trade. I personally think that idea is ridiculous. There’s ZERO guarantee that any of the money used from Marners contract will be used on players that will live up to their own contracts. The leaf fanbase doesn’t seem to understand that a 4 million dollar player could be overpaid, too. Like, look at a player like Ben Chiarot, Erik Gudbransom, John Klingberg. Those guys combined probably make more than Marner.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 1 h 35
Sujet:
I just want to say I hope Marner remains a Leaf for a long time
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KingExLeafs</b></div><div>He's not that type of winger in the playoffs. He just isn't. He's afraid of the physicality. He can't seem to elevate his game. He doesn't make nice plays. He doesn't go to the middle of the ice. He lacks composure (remember him putting the puck over the glass multiple times in the Montreal series??)
Time to move on. Leafs can make better use of the 12 million he's going to demand on his next contract come July.</div></div>
That just isn’t true. 12 million can be easily wasted on 3 average players, too.
Acquiring talent like Marner is the hardest part. Besides, it’s not like the rest of the team hasn’t continuously collapsed as well. I’m genuinely confused why everyone wants to single Marner out. Like, our team this year was borderline ass. I have no idea how we pushed Boston to 7 given that our bluline looked like this:
Rielly-Lynushkin
Benoit-McCabe
Edmundson-Liljegren
Like that’s abysmal. Not to mention our bottom-6 was probably the worst it’s been in 5 years too. This is just such a bad year to be “the year to blow it all up” for so many reasons. One of them being that you can’t even trade them even if you wanted to hahahaha.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 1 h 12
Sujet:
2 sides of a Marner trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WN88</b></div><div>D can be addressed regardless if we decide to keep Marner or not.
I find that all these Marner trades emphasize the idea that just freeing up 11 million is worth getting rid of him or provides some certain value. Any player in the NHL can be overpaid. The same way Marner can , at times, not live up to 11 million dollars. So I’m not sure what I’m supposed to do with this extra “6.5 million” in ur hypothetical.</div></div>
However, I will admit that there can be concerns with Marners game when he’s completely Removed from talent. Playoffs have shown that he does need time/space to do his thing. I do think, though, teams that acquire him understand this, but also realize that the potential in having him with elite finishers is immense.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 1 h 11
Sujet:
2 sides of a Marner trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CaseyFlyman</b></div><div>As a fan of the team that signed Johnny Gaudreau: I'm skeptical. Without support, it's too easy for NHL defenses to swarm one player, especially if they're undersized and primarily a playmaker.
Marner is an incredibly valuable player, and Minnesota probably gives you the best potential package just because they're looking for another elite talent to go alongside Boldy/Kaprizov. But the return really comes down to three things:
1) If the Leafs are going to make changes to the core four, he's the one. Matthews and Nylander aren't going anywhere, and Tavares is a $6M player making $11M; you're likely giving him away if you want to get rid of the whole contract. The Leafs wanting to move Marner is the worst kept secret in hockey, so teams are looking to take advantage of that.
2) If you do move Mitch, not many teams can take an $11M cap hit, so you're either retaining or limiting the number of suiters, which would decrease a potential return.
3) Mitch has a full NMC. He's not going to waive that and just say "send me wherever you get the best package", he's going to use that to pick his spot and force Toronto to trade him to one of a select few locations (like when Kaberle was traded, the list was: Boston...and that's it).
If I'm honest, I think Minnesota has to make that pick this year's 1st (13 OA) if they're going to have Toronto retain even ~$3M, but if you get Rossi, Gustavsson, and 13OA...take that and run. A starting-caliber goalie that's only 25 and locked up to a reasonable deal, a potential 2C of the future (which Toronto desperately needs if Tavares regresses), and 13OA? Use the pick, or the extra ~$6.5M in cap space and free agency, to fix the D.</div></div>
D can be addressed regardless if we decide to keep Marner or not.
I find that all these Marner trades emphasize the idea that just freeing up 11 million is worth getting rid of him or provides some certain value. Any player in the NHL can be overpaid. The same way Marner can , at times, not live up to 11 million dollars. So I’m not sure what I’m supposed to do with this extra “6.5 million” in ur hypothetical.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 0 h 58
Sujet:
2 sides of a Marner trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WN88</b></div><div>That would definitely be better. I think I’d prefer Brodin but I can understand why that would be a big no from ur perspective.
If I’m being honest, I’m in the minority of Leafs fans that actually wants to keep Marner. There’s not a whole lot a team could offer that would make me want to give him up in a trade (unless it was a soon-to-be #1 D like Brandt Clarke, Simon Nemec, etc.).</div></div>
But just for fun, would you swap Spurge w/ Brodin if we added McCabe? He’s probably our best d-man and only makes 2 million dollars this upcoming season. A fan-favourite, plays with A TON of bite/physicality, too. Strikes me as someone that would be easy to extend at a reasonable cap hit as well.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 0 h 54
Sujet:
2 sides of a Marner trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OutCold13</b></div><div>Out of curiosity, would it interest you if I made the deal Spurgeon and defensive prospect of the Leafs choice (we are probably talking Hunt, O'Rourke, or Lambos plus Rossi. No picks no retention?</div></div>
That would definitely be better. I think I’d prefer Brodin but I can understand why that would be a big no from ur perspective.
If I’m being honest, I’m in the minority of Leafs fans that actually wants to keep Marner. There’s not a whole lot a team could offer that would make me want to give him up in a trade (unless it was a soon-to-be #1 D like Brandt Clarke, Simon Nemec, etc.).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 0 h 28
Sujet:
with Tre trading history we dont want him to trade Marner
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaun80</b></div><div>I'd be interested to read that, because I sure didn't see it coming. He was over a point per game for 3 seasons before that huge season. I figured he was the one driving play on the 2nd line with Bennett and Duclair. I wasn't a fan of the signings, I figured we were going to flip them both at the deadline and get 3 1st round picks for Tkachuk.</div></div>
https://jhanhky.substack.com/p/whats-wrong-with-huberdeau?utm_source=publication-search
This was his piece half-way through the 22-23 season (his first season with CGY). However, I can recall him tweeting about questions in his game upon the day of the trade. Unfortantely I cannot find those Tweets so you'll have to take my word for it haha.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 0 h 20
Sujet:
2 sides of a Marner trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OutCold13</b></div><div>I am not making the trade under the presumption of a pre signed extension. I have the Wild taking a risk here, so yes it plays into it. Is any one sure what Marner is if he isn't with Matthew's. He is still good no doubt but probably not a 100 point producer in most situations. The rest of your argument I really don't have a rebuttal for other than Friedman saying the Leafs may be willing to lose the Marner trade for the sake of changing the team up.</div></div>
I guess that's reasonable under the assumption that you're taking a risk. Perhaps this is a bit far-fetched, but I think, hypothetically, any team Marner would waive for would also likely be a team he'd extend with. I can't really speak on the trade rumours. All I can say is it's incredibly sad to see just how many "fans" and people in the media want to see the destruction of a team.
I've watched just about every game of the Matthews/Nylander/Marner era. I can assure you that Marner would be a 100-point player away from Auston Matthews. I mean, don't get me wrong. I'm not saying you could put him with borderline fourth-liners, and he'd still reach that mark. But I'm certain that you could expect at least 90-100 points if you slid him into just about any team's top-6.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 0 h 0
Sujet:
with Tre trading history we dont want him to trade Marner
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaun80</b></div><div>How can you say that? Who in the world was predicting the biggest point drop off in the history of the NHL? If Tre can get a similar return to either of those trades for Marner leafs fans will be extatic.</div></div>
Can't find where, but people that are much smarter than the average hockey fan do exist. JackHan on twitter (former Leafs development coach) actually made a pretty in-depth and insightful post about why Huberdeau was the most overrated player in the league at the time and was due for that kind of drop-off.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 23 h 58
Sujet:
with Tre trading history we dont want him to trade Marner
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TyeZerker</b></div><div>Leafs need a RHD not A LHD, Graves to Tor does nothing</div></div>
So you're saying if Graves shot right, you'd make that trade?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 23 h 58
Sujet:
with Tre trading history we dont want him to trade Marner
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>draft_em_sign_em_trade_em</b></div><div>Probably what trade Tre gets if he moves Marner.
Garbage.</div></div>
Graves and Rackell are garbage.
Huberdeau was probably the most overrated player in the league at the time, but I don't blame Tre for acquiring him in the trade. On the other hand, Weegar was probably the most underrated player in the league and is still an elite top-pairing defenceman.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 23 h 54
Sujet:
2 sides of a Marner trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OutCold13</b></div><div>I will disagree on the lack of value, but if it doesn't address your needs then I need to except that since I don't really know the Leafs.</div></div>
I'm sorry bro, but it's not. Rossi looks like he has a solid future ahead of him; he might even become a point-per-game player (despite being a 5'9 centre). I understand Minnesota had their struggles this season, but at this point, Gus has only recorded 1 good season under his very, very short career so far. And the first-round pick you're giving up will likely be in the 20s.
On the other hand, you're pretty much getting a 100-point winger at a 5 million-dollar cap hit (and I'm assuming that you would only make this trade if Marner agreed to an extension). Not to mention he plays in every single situation, at an elite level. The odds Rossi would ever enter the realm of becoming as good as Marner is incredibly slim. Organizations will tank for years just to have a non-zero chance of acquiring a talent like Marner. The Leafs could sign him for the rest of his career on July 1st. From my perspective, this is giving him up for practically nothing in the bigger picture.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 23 h 45
Sujet:
2 sides of a Marner trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WN88</b></div><div>There's just nothing of value there that would entice the Leafs to give up arguably the most valuable player to their team. It doesn't even address their biggest long-term need in a #1 D-man.</div></div>
I didn't even notice you had them retaining HALF of his cap hit in a year they're supposed to be contending for a Stanley Cup. lol.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 23 h 44
Sujet:
2 sides of a Marner trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OutCold13</b></div><div>Well that was a deep thought. Care to explain your opinion?</div></div>
There's just nothing of value there that would entice the Leafs to give up arguably the most valuable player to their team. It doesn't even address their biggest long-term need in a #1 D-man.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 23 h 42
Sujet:
with Tre trading history we dont want him to trade Marner
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>draft_em_sign_em_trade_em</b></div><div>My point exactly, with a 1 yr deal before UFA player (Tkachuck) Tre trades him for overpaid 2 twilight players which he resigned for too many years.
Imagine how crazy Leaf fans would go with Marner gets traded for Rakell and Graves and a 1st. lol</div></div>
Wait. Are you comparing Graves and Rackell to Huberdeau and Weegar?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 23 h 40
Sujet:
2 sides of a Marner trade
HORRIBLE
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com