SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Rosey

Rosey
Membre depuis
21 mars 2018
Équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
78
Messages par jour
0.0
Forum: Fauteuil - DG31 mars 2019 à 10 h 4
Forum: Armchair-GM15 févr. 2019 à 14 h 22
Sujet: I dont know a thing about Vancouver 1
Dorsett is retired from back problems

Gagner has negative value at this point, if the canucks bury him he costs 2M if they pay to trade him retained they keep 1.5M. Makes more sense to bury him and keep assets. He may have more interest come summertime, I hope.

Stecher is very underrated, I would go as far as saying Benning wouldnt trade him. We dont have enough young RHD in our system right now and Stecher has made strides, recently taken over 1st PP duties with Edler out.

Guys on the trade block in Vancouver:
Pouliot
Sutter
Gudbranson
Granlund
Schaller

And maybe Goldobin.. But you dont just find offensive talents like Goldobin available. Its been apparent so far the Canucks see the value in developing Goldobins defensive deficiencies vs trading him which is a good thing. The question is though, if the kid just doesnt get it, how much longer do you beat a dead horse.
Forum: Armchair-GM12 févr. 2019 à 13 h 5
Sujet: The Usual Suspects
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DirtyDangles</b></div><div><a href="https://www.tsn.ca/panthers-huberdeau-joins-tsn-trade-bait-board-1.1255876" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://www.tsn.ca/panthers-huberdeau-joins-tsn-trade-bait-board-1.1255876</a>

Seems to me they might still have interest before the TDL...</div></div>

LeBrun said the chances of Florida trading for Bob at/before the deadline was "slim".

I would trust LeBrun over Servelli. And that Servelli article is 100% speculation of who might be on the trade block if they were interest in trading for Bob/Panarin.

<a href="https://theathletic.com/801810/2019/02/06/lebrun-notebook-possible-suitors-for-wayne-simmonds-and-panthers-interest-in-artemi-panarin-and-sergei-bobrovsky/" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">LeBrun Article (Athletic/Paywall)</a>
Forum: Armchair-GM12 févr. 2019 à 12 h 54
Sujet: Nashville - Canucks fans what do you think of this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rosey</b></div><div>Fabbro holds too much leverage to be used as a 1 for 1 in those types of trades... if he doesnt want to spend the next 8 years of his life in Ottawa or Columbus he just doesn't sign and goes where he wants in August of 2020.

From a Vancouver perspective, and as much as I would hate to lose a Vancouver guy (... albeit to get a Vancouver guy), I think you have to make this deal...

2019 D Pairings of:
Edler Fabbro
Hughes Tanev
Hutton Stetcher

That is 3 pretty decent NHL defensive pairings... it does what the organization has been talking about for a long time in insulating their rookies with veterans, and on tough nights/matchups/pk HCTG can still go back to Edler Tanev if he wants...</div></div>

Those D pairings are so sexy
Forum: Armchair-GM8 févr. 2019 à 18 h 41
Sujet: Serious question
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jamiepo</b></div><div>I think the offer has to be over 4.1m to let him walk. Things like cap space could effect our ability and it may take some moves. I think if you go over the 4.1m you are sure to have kappy sign and leafs don’t match. Getting a 1st and 3rd( I believe)... I think they take the picks and save the money.</div></div>

I dont think a team would give him over 4.1 since they compensation would be too high. The max i would go personally is 4 so the compensation would only be a 2nd rounder.

I wouldnt mind if the Leafs matched an offer at 4M AAV. Half of the reason of putting in an offersheet is to put the Leafs in a tough situation against the cap. Why would other teams pay an extra 100k AAV if they would have to give up a bigger compensation package?
Forum: Armchair-GM6 févr. 2019 à 15 h 52
Sujet: If this is the team heading into 2019-20 season WOW
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RC333</b></div><div>Bruh Andreas Johnson isn't worth 4 million wth. I'd rather keep the second cuz bennings a crafting wizard.

I do agree 100% though that canucks should go after Karlsson and Stone. This team would **** other teams up with those guys. Sutter and Gudbranson would have to go and can easily be replaced with Gaudette and Juolevi.

Goldy/Dahlen - Petey - Boeser
Baertschi - Horvat - Stone
Roussell - Gaudette - Virtanen
Eriksson - Beagle - Motte
Edler - Karlsson
Hughes - Tanev
Hutton - Stecher</div></div>

Yeah we’re in the playoffs If that happens. No questions asked. We’d rip up most Pacific teams. This is exactly the lines and team I want to see next year. I’d rather Dahlén with Pettersson again just to see if there is still chemistry. Dahlén has had a solid year in the AHL and should definitely be ready.
Forum: Armchair-GM5 juill. 2018 à 17 h 14
Sujet: Another Tanev to TO trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LoganOllivier</b></div><div>Its only fair if you look at it from a perspective that Toronto is desperate for a RHD defenceman, they are far from desperate. The defence they have got them to the playoffs and set a franchise record for wins and points. Nylander is a star and will have a huge career, a way better career than Tanev. You wouldn't be trading Tanev if you believed differently.

So you know the trade isn't fair.

Tanev would instantly become a top pairing guy in TO playing with Reilly, and he'd make Reilly a better player but Reilly is already a great player and is still only 24 or something like that. So he's still got room to grow. Tanev has peaked. Nylander would instantly become one of the two most talented players on Vancouver, right up there with Boeser. (I value Horvat ahead of Nylander though since he's a good centre but its close and Nylander has a lot more skill than Horvat). So essentially the Canucks would be obtaining a world class talent Nylander for a very good defensive defenceman who has past his best seasons. That isn't remotely fair.

Do the Leafs want Tanev, likely yes. Do they want him at any cost? No definitely not. So with that in mind, you need to propose a trade that would look attractive to the Leafs and losing Nylander isn't attractive unless you offer way more than he's worth. He's the best player in the trade, you don't give up the best player in the trade unless you are getting either equal value in players coming back or in assets that will be better in the future. None of this is happening in a Nylander for Tanev trade.

As for the trade above, as much as I like Brown, this trade greatly helps out Toronto and comes at the cost of a very good young depth winger but one that will have trouble getting off the 4th line due to the depth ahead of him. Moving him for Tanev would solidify the defence and at the cost of a middle 6 winger who is on the 4th line in TO.

Here's a question though, would you retain half of Tanev's salary to upgrade the pick to a first?</div></div>

I've maintained that Tanev for a late 2019 1st is probably fair. If the Canucks retained 50% for two years on Tanev's contract then the Leafs would need to add another pick or a prospect.