PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
2
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
MNBassman
MNBassman
Membre depuis
14 mai 2015
Équipe favorite
Wild du Minnesota
Messages dans les forums
8161
Messages par jour
2.5
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 avr. à 12 h 42
Sujet:
Fixin Stuff
Spurgeon is too old, too small & too beat up for us to have interest
He’s still a decent player
But his Cap hit & skill set aren’t really a fit for what we are looking for either
Plus I’m sure we won’t wanna move those prospects
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 mars à 11 h 3
Sujet:
Marco Polo
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNBassman</b></div><div>I would demand Savoie or Kulich instead of Rosen.</div></div>
That's a fair point. Article on the athletic was saying that the rochester (Sabres ahl) coach is prioritizing a middle 6 skill set for kulich and rosen. So he's stressing defense, pk, faceoffs, all in addition to offense. I guess Rosen is still ahead of kulich as far as overall game. Rosen is 5'11" and I think up to 175, so he's not the waif that we drafted. The Sabres have a bad reputation for developing players, but I will say that I heard they were prioritizing rest and weight training for the smaller prospects, in order to build them up for the pro game. Still, I get it, Rosens numbers don't jump off the page for a guy that is undersized, so I can see wanting to take either a thicker shooter in kulich, or a more dynamic savoie. Not sure kulich or savoie are centers in the NHL, if that was a thought.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 mars à 23 h 52
Sujet:
One Last Year Of Suffering
Los Angeles isn't interested in either lame duck veteran. We'd rather spend $2.5 million to re-sign Lizotte and run one roster slot short than spend $2.775 million on those guys.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 mars à 9 h 20
Sujet:
Marco Polo
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNBassman</b></div><div>I would demand Savoie or Kulich instead of Rosen.</div></div>
I think Buffalo would stick with their guys then. Just the vibes I get from Kevyn Adams.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 mars à 16 h 1
Sujet:
Rossi trade thought
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>My alternative to trading Rossi for pick 9 overall is pick 16 plus one of, say, Lambos, O'Rourke or Peart for pick 9 overall. Just a thought. (I hate giving up on top-10 draft picks as a matter of philosophy.)</div></div>
Ah I gotcha - yeah that's interesting in theory as a separate ACGM.
You and I can agree they shouldn't give up on Rossi, but there is smoke there.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 mars à 15 h 48
Sujet:
Rossi trade thought
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNCountryClub</b></div><div>I'm not following what your point is? I know PIT has a bad prospect pool - that's presumably why they'd be interested in a 22 YO center and part of the reason why I made the trade in the first place.
But what does the Wild's pick have to do with this and who is trading up?</div></div>
My alternative to trading Rossi for pick 9 overall is pick 16 plus one of, say, Lambos, O'Rourke or Peart for pick 9 overall. Just a thought. (I hate giving up on top-10 draft picks as a matter of philosophy.)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 mars à 15 h 36
Sujet:
Rossi trade thought
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>I was saying that you've already found a team with a lousy prospect pool and missing draft picks -- Pittsburgh.
</div></div>
I'm not following what your point is? I know PIT has a bad prospect pool - that's presumably why they'd be interested in a 22 YO center and part of the reason why I made the trade in the first place.
But what does the Wild's pick have to do with this and who is trading up?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 mars à 14 h 56
Sujet:
Rossi trade thought
The bird in the hand is worth more than the bird in the bush.
That being said, if for some reason the scouting staff are high on Zayne Parekh or Carter Yakemchuk at that spot, maybe. I just think that a center taken four drafts ago is worth more than an A prospect RhD, but maybe people are concerned about Rossi's size. And the Wild's pick is going to be 13 - 16, so moving up might be a better strategy, especially with a team that has a lousy prospect pool and holes in the dance card.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
20 mars à 18 h 29
Sujet:
Riddikulus
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>So you would rather keep a bottom 6 forward who’s one of the worst contracts in the league and is a major cap dump rather than trade him and a 3rd round pick for a bonafide top 4 dman who instantly becomes your best dman? That deal favours Montreal by an insane amount. Even if you don’t want Brodin because of how many LHD you have you can easily flip him for a much bigger return. Minnesota would block your number</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNBassman</b></div><div>Congrats!! That Brodin trade is the worst trade I’ve seen here in months!</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Just out of curiosity, aren't power forwards supposed to outscore defensemen?
Brodin has 33% more points in 20% fewer games than Anderson, and he's better defensively than any Habs blueliner including Matheson.</div></div>
The problem isn't his contract or capabilities, the biggest issue is he isn't healthy and may never be the same after his recovery.
I don't think Momtreal would or should be making a move for Brodin since we are overflowing with LHD and prospects but the trade definitely favours the Habs by quite a bit.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars à 15 h 59
Sujet:
Wild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNBassman</b></div><div>Middleton is NOT a 3rd pairing defenseman! He’s a very good #2!</div></div>
On Edmonton's roster he'd be on the 3rd pairing though. He won't play ahead of Nurse or Ekholm. The trade simply makes no sense for Edmonton.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars à 14 h 22
Sujet:
The Direction We Need to Go
Knies is hardly ruthless, and he' not that big. But he's a solid NHLer who likely gets quite a lot better.
Even at 4m, the Leafs pass on Spurgeon.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 14 h 9
Sujet:
Rinzel
RHD is by far the thinest part of the Hawks prospect pool with Rinzel the only guy of note at this point that has any chance of more than a bottom pair filler. Barring the Hawks diving into the UFA market for a guy like Pesce or Montour and even then probably having to take a RHD with their own 1st, I don't see any reason the Hawks would give up on Rinzel as his development has been exactly what you hoped for when they took a bit of a flier on his raw skill package 2 drafts ago. At a minimum, there would need to be something WAY more compelling than another pick in the middle of the first which at this point kicks the can down the road 2 years further from getting a guy that can help in the NHL which at some point is the reason you start a rebuild. The conversation would need to start with that 1st & Spacek and again that probably only gets listened to if they have taken Levshunov at 2,3, or 4 if they don't luck into Celebrini.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 13 h 1
Sujet:
Rinzel
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNBassman</b></div><div>It drives me absolutely nuts that the Wild’s dip**** owner, Craig Leipold is going to watch the Blackhawks build TWO dynasties through the draft because they were prepared and patient…while his Wild enjoy 10-15 more years of mediocrity!</div></div>
The knuckle dragging meathead faction of our fanbase hates the rebuild and are actively calling for Davidson to be fired yet they'll be the first in line at the next parade. It's unreal!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 10 h 27
Sujet:
Rinzel
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>I can definitely see the Hawks using either the Tampa Bay 1st or their own 2nd to pick a RD. Maybe players like Mews or Elick? I'd personally be fine w/ Leshevnov if the Hawks don't get Celebrini, but I just feel like that Hawks 1st rounder is getting used on a forward. And yeah, Jones is likely the top pair RD for another 3 seasons at a minimum.</div></div>
Celebrini , Demidov or Lindstrom
Jiricek or Elick
Could be huge
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 10 h 10
Sujet:
Rinzel
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>And Jones is locked in at 1RD :)
Hoping you guys don’t draft a RD</div></div>
Oh, I very much hope they do! for Rinzel to be the only legit RHD prospect...they need to get deeper at that position.
Unless your hoping this so we don't take Levshunov so OTT can draft him!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 9 h 54
Sujet:
Rinzel
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Fair offer but Hawks decline. Rinzel to me is the heir apparent to the 2nd pair RD spot when Murphy's deal is up in two years. Another year at MN, a year in the AHL, and hopefully he's ready for prime time.</div></div>
And Jones is locked in at 1RD :)
Hoping you guys don’t draft a RD
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 9 h 27
Sujet:
Rinzel
I concur with exo... He's really the only high-end RHD in our system, so we'll want to see how he works out.
Gotta say, though, I recently saw him in a few college games in the latter part of the season, and he surprised me. I kept hearing that he was "raw;" "years away;" "needs to learn his position;" etc, etc, etc... Yet what I saw was a big, fast, composed, and confident D - IN HIS OWN END. He made mostly good decisions, even when stressed or pressed by multiple attackers in space or on the boards.
At the offensive end is when he seemed not to know what to do as much - especially when carrying in the puck. He seems to WANT to carry the pick in, but isn't sure how that works - yet.
So, my guess is that you'll have him in Gopherland - for at least another year. When he turns pro, too, he'll likely then also benefit from a year or two in the AHL before coming into the big league.
As a low 1st round pick, the Hawks gambled a bit on his raw potential. They knew he was going to take time to grow his game. Yet it increasingly seems as though the gamble may be VERY worth the risk in the long run.
Enjoy watching him with the Gophers! Cheers
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 9 h 20
Sujet:
Rinzel
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNBassman</b></div><div>Makes sense! The Wild have literally nothing in the cupboards for future RHDs which is why I want Rinzel so badly.
Just promise me your squad will let him play another year or two with my Gophers!!! 😆</div></div>
I honestly hope they do! I hate rushing prospects. Especially for a Hawks team that isn't very good. Allow the kids to properly develop.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 9 h 14
Sujet:
Rinzel
I'd love this, but CHI has very little reason to do this.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 9 h 14
Sujet:
Rinzel
Fair offer but Hawks decline. Rinzel to me is the heir apparent to the 2nd pair RD spot when Murphy's deal is up in two years. Another year at MN, a year in the AHL, and hopefully he's ready for prime time.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 8 h 54
Sujet:
Rinzel
As a Hawks fan, we're very excited as well. He's really our only high end RHD prospect in the entire system. Well keep him!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mars à 16 h 21
Sujet:
Preds
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNBassman</b></div><div>For a team ready to win now, Zuccarello would get a 1st in return.</div></div>
To ask the Wild to retain money next year when they're still cap strapped, it better be a 1st coming back to make it worth it. Especially to a divisional rival.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mars à 14 h 35
Sujet:
Crazy Ideas
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ryminister_92</b></div><div>I didn’t say they were centres, I said they could play centre if needed. They have the skill and experience to do it if it’s needed. & even if they don’t, that leaves Fantilli, Sillinger, and Jenner as your top 3 centres. Rossi would be buried. It just doesn’t seem to fit. If there’s a guy they like further down their board I’m sure there’s a better way to move down and pick up something else that would be useful</div></div>
That's assuming there's no temporary hitches with development progress for Fantilli and Sillinger and Voronkov (and Rossi as well, frankly), which we all know isn't going to be the case - every kid has those moments where they need to take a step back and regroup. So the extra coverage is useful. And it wouldn't be the first time we've moved Jenner to the wing of another guy playing center so that he can take faceoffs for them while they're learning the rest of the job. He's pretty good at that.
I'd be more concerned about whether or not this makes sense for Minnesota, frankly. Are they that concerned about size down the middle?
EDIT: I will also readily concede that it'd be <strong>nicer</strong> for us if we were getting back someone like Brodin (or some other experienced good-contract minute-munching LD to mentor our blueline prospects) instead, but there's limits. :)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mars à 14 h 20
Sujet:
Crazy Ideas
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caerii</b></div><div>Finally get another top six center and move him for a mediocre one dimensional winger who can't skate? :-/</div></div>
At least if the Wild trade Rossi, he'll finally get a chance to play with skilled wingers for more than a cup of coffee.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mars à 14 h 15
Sujet:
Crazy Ideas
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ryminister_92</b></div><div>Neither of these trades make sense for the other teams involved.
LA is already loaded at centre and have multiple prospects that can fill in if needed. Between Kopitar, Danault, and Dubois they’re set for the foreseeable future - not to mention Byfield and Turcotte can play centre if needed as well. Why would they add another small centre and give up their 1st and a good young player for that?
Columbus is also loaded with centres and they’re young. They’ve got Fantilli, Sillinger, Jenner, Johnson, Texier, Roslovic, and Kuraly who can all play centre on their roster so again I ask why would they be trading for another one and giving up a top 5 pick?</div></div>
Texier and KJ aren't centers and Roz is likely on his way out after this season (and he's better on the wing as is). It's plausible for the Jackets if there's someone we like further down the draft order - we've got a lot of high quality kids already so if we can get someone who's already largely developed AND pick up someone else for the future, it works out to be a good deal. Under most circumstances (read: the majority of "trade up" proposals) it'd probably be a bad move, but this one is actually pretty decent.
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com