PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
8
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
LobsterMagnet19
Membre depuis
17 mai 2015
Équipe favorite
Avalanche du Colorado
Deuxième équipe favorite
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Messages dans les forums
388
Messages par jour
0.1
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 avr. 2017 à 16 h 57
Sujet:
Avs get defense Jackets get offense
Absolutely insane offer for the Avs. They give up two players in their prime who are on good fair contracts (but for some reason retain salary anyway?) so that they can get a middling, honestly bottom pairing dman in Murray and then role the die on a couple of "meh" prospects? I don't think so. You're off by a mile here.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 avr. 2017 à 23 h 50
Sujet:
Improving the Avs
You did not make the Avs better by trading away young assets and draft picks for Ben Hutton and the opportunity to sign overpriced, old UFAs. You made them worse and removed opportunities for their prospects.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 avr. 2017 à 23 h 48
Sujet:
Bringing in Jarmo's past pick
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jacketsman61</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LobsterMagnet19</b></div><div>
Dude.... A bottom pairing defenseman, 4th liner, a B prospect, and likely late pick in a draft a year away is "waaaaaaaaayyyyy too much" for Duchene? An established top six forward with multiple All Star and Team Canada appearances and multiple .9ppg+ seasons. That's asinine. Columbus would run away giggling and giddy from this deal like a school girl. It's less than the Avs got for O'Reilly, less than the Jets got for Kane, hell, it's actually CLOSER in value to what Ladd, Shattenkirk, and Hanzal fetched as RENTALS on trade deadline day (prospect, + contract dump + late 1st) and its LESS than what the Rangers paid to get Yandle. All of that to say that your continued devaluing of Duchene in every single Avalanche thread is ridiculous and undermines any hopes at credibility you might hope for in your comments.</div></div>
See, your comment just stated why you really don't know much about the players in the trade. Let me educate you. Murray is a top 4 defenseman. Probably a top 2 if given the chance. Murray was only playing the third pair because the first pairing consist of Werenski and Jones. Normally we would slot Murray alongside Savard but Johnson cannot play with anyone other than Savard. We would get rid of Johnson but him and Savard together is our best defensive pairing and one of the best in the league. Now, with the emergence of Carlsson and Nutivarra, Murray is expendable. So it has nothing to do with ability. But understand the Jackets will not sell Murray below his value.</div></div>
<img class="for_img" src="http://i.imgur.com/8Y7YYOU.png" alt="8Y7YYOU.png">
Sure doesn't look like a "top 4 or top pairing" defenseman to me.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 avr. 2017 à 1 h 37
Sujet:
Avalanche Rebuilding
Not a bad structure for a Nashville/Duchene deal. It will depend exactly how late that NSH pick is, but without knowing my instinct is that the Avs need to add a little on their end.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 avr. 2017 à 1 h 36
Sujet:
Bringing in Jarmo's past pick
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rangersandislesfan</b></div><div>in my opinion that is waaaaaayyyy too much for Duchene.</div></div>
Dude.... A bottom pairing defenseman, 4th liner, a B prospect, and likely late pick in a draft a year away is "waaaaaaaaayyyyy too much" for Duchene? An established top six forward with multiple All Star and Team Canada appearances and multiple .9ppg+ seasons. That's asinine. Columbus would run away giggling and giddy from this deal like a school girl. It's less than the Avs got for O'Reilly, less than the Jets got for Kane, hell, it's actually CLOSER in value to what Ladd, Shattenkirk, and Hanzal fetched as RENTALS on trade deadline day (prospect, + contract dump + late 1st) and its LESS than what the Rangers paid to get Yandle. All of that to say that your continued devaluing of Duchene in every single Avalanche thread is ridiculous and undermines any hopes at credibility you might hope for in your comments.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 avr. 2017 à 19 h 18
Sujet:
Realistic expectations on a Duchene trade
This is solid work (rare for these boards). You've balanced the lack of high end defenseman in the deal with other assets that would interest and make sense for Colorado. I'd expect the Avs to add something small in this deal going the other way though tbh. B/C rated prospect that CBJ has their eye on and wants to turn around. Something like that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 avr. 2017 à 22 h 50
Sujet:
fjrgfhjhjsfd
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rangersandislesfan</b></div><div>guys, can't you tell this roster is a joke?</div></div>
Jokes usually have some sort of humor or punchline. Not sure what that is here.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 avr. 2017 à 20 h 2
Sujet:
Baby Steps V2
Don't let bad scores and silly comments from Leafs fans sway you on Duchene. Not only are you right in your instincts about his value, but history and all reasonable evidence are on your side as well. People on this site have such short memories and suddenly act like Johansen for Jones never happened. Even Hall for Larsson (which was lauded as terrible) would net the Avs more than shitty Jake Bean and a 1st rounder, but Leafs fans here want to say even THAT is too much? Please. Don't let the "Avs are bad" circlejerk get you down. You've put together some solid reasonable stuff here.
I like the Bjugstad/Soderberg thing as an idea, but for the time being I don't see the incentive. As far as I can tell the Avs would still be better off hoping for Soderberg to rebound as he seems more likely than Bjugstad. That said, there are other ways to make that swap worth it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 avr. 2017 à 20 h 18
Sujet:
Baby Steps
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>orignalsix</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LobsterMagnet19</b></div><div>
Is this all you do all day?
FWIW that trade is right on par with the value that comparable players have brought back in trade.</div></div>
So Duchene with 6m contract and only 2 years left and his 41 points is worth Hanifan and his 29 points from his Dman position, 5 more years of control and makes only about 1m a year. Now tell me why is Duchene such a great value to the budget minded Canes? And being subjective on the Duchene thread, he has never shown he can left an out of the play offs team to success. And Canes have to throw in a first rounder too.
Canes would be much better off to sign a UFA for 5m, keep Hanifan and their pick.</div></div>
Singling out 1 season of an 8 year NHL player's career, when he's on the worst roster in 20 years and often playing with a PTO on one wing and a waiver pickup on the other doesn't seem like a great metric for evaluating a trade in reality. It is, however, a great framework for circle-jerking around. Still in his prime production years, Duchene's track record of success (multiple Team CAN appearances, multiple All-Star appearances, multiple .9+ PPG seasons) far outweighs 30 bad games on a team that was out of the playoffs in December (before that Duchene was actually on a 30g pace again). Now that's a big ticket item in the NHL, as evidenced by the fact that you very rarely see players like that traded.
Hanifin is a big ticket item too, but lets not go nuts here. 1/3 of his points that you're touting with no context came on CAR's pretty avg power play (meanwhile Duchene's production dipped hard without many PP points on the league's worst PP unit). 2nd, Noah Hanifin spent the vast majority of the season logging limited minutes while sheltered. Is there a ton of potential in the kid? Of course. Is he already a bonafide stud D? Not at all. There's still plenty of risk involved in Hanifin not living up to that potential.
So lets sum it up. The Hurricanes would be looking to pick up the 2nd best offensive player in the history of their franchise at a time where they have an exceptionally deep D pipeline and can afford the loss of Hanifin, who would be instantly replaced within their system. While the Avs are looking to pick up a potential rebuild defenseman for a franchise that's struggled greatly to produce them, while giving up an all star calibre F who they replace through their own system in Jost. Now we can quibble about the add ins and add ons on each side and that's cool. I think in a deal like this the Avs would likely have to add Chris Bigras to stymie the loss of Hanifin. All that said, pretending that Hanifin for Duchene makes no sense on its face is ridiculous. It's an obvious quality fit for both sides in position, value, age, and win window. Dismissing it out of hand is ridiculous.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 avr. 2017 à 18 h 38
Sujet:
Baby Steps
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rangersandislesfan</b></div><div>Waaaaaaayyyyy too much for Duchene if you ask me.</div></div>
Is this all you do all day?
FWIW that trade is right on par with the value that comparable players have brought back in trade.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 avr. 2017 à 10 h 47
Sujet:
Still a Contending Team, Duchene Trade
The Avs are embarking on a rebuild, so using a 30 year old middle pairing D as the defensive centerpiece of a Duchene trade isn't going to be interesting to them. Looking to get younger, not older.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 avr. 2017 à 22 h 23
Sujet:
Won't be last this year!
Not bad, I think you're on to something with the Islanders trade but should target flip the values on Dal Colle and Lee. Avs and Isles too honestly, would be better served by putting more value in the non-NHL assets headed to COL and allowing NYI to retain its immediate NHL talent. That's what they need in order to keep Tavares around and make a push.
The Carolina trade IMO is a no go though. The Avs are so asset poor that it doesn't make sense to send two high value picks for a guy whose value has consistently diminished since his draft year and looks to be a very real threat for busting entirely.
Value is too rich on Wiercioch. The Avs have scratched him for weeks and he's unlikely to be retained at this point anyway. Devils could probably get him for free.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 avr. 2017 à 2 h 54
Sujet:
Landeskog
If you didn't answer the Avs' needs on defense then you aren't getting one of their top f's and in this case, their captain. This is an especially baffling lack of fit considering that it's Carolina making the trade proposal. The D piece absolutely has to be more impactful here. Your most underwhelming D prospect coming off a really underwhelming AHL debut just does not cut it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. 2017 à 17 h 14
Sujet:
What about this....
Carolina says no. The value is lopsided in Colorado's favor. The other issue here is simply that the deal is too complex. There's too many moving parts. Multiplayer deals this size with real calibre players dont happen in the NHL for reason. They are virtually impossible to balance.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 avr. 2017 à 15 h 9
Sujet:
Youth Movement, No Pylons, No Trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>coga16</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LobsterMagnet19</b></div><div>
I hope Barberio doesnt get claimed by Vegas, he really has been the perfect depth add for them. Can move up to move in the Top 4 but really is a strong 3rd pair guy to play with. Him and Lindholm would be a solid 3rd pair next season, at least to start.
Duchene trade really is the key here. Do they get a Righty or Lefty. It seems like they have been attached to Right hand Dmen for the most part with is crazy to me. Unless they plan on moving on from barrie too. I dont know why they are linked to so many rights</div></div>
So let's play with that a bit. For expo protection I'm imagining 8 skaters: EJ, Barrie, Z, Barberio, Duchene, Landeskog, MacK, Andrighetto.
As for targeting RHD in a Duchene deal, it's a tricky thing but I think it has more to do with EJ than Barrie. If they're looking to go real young, Johnson doesn't make a lot of sense for the team anymore. He'll be deteriorating right as the Avs enter the best years of their next window to win. I personally can't help but wonder about the EJ for Drouin thing that popped up a few months back. If the Avs trade Duchene for an RHD that kind of move would make sense.</div></div>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 avr. 2017 à 14 h 56
Sujet:
Youth Movement, No Pylons, No Trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>coga16</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LobsterMagnet19</b></div><div>Alzner wants both more money and more term than that. Franson is an interesting idea for the Avs though. Lindholm, Mironov, Bigras are all better value and sense for the Avs than signing Postma.</div></div>
I agree with the Postma signing. But Bigras will be in the AHL next year. He had a tough injury filled season so he needs more time. I might want to see the Avs resign Weircoich over Postma but getting another RHD in postma might not be the worst idea.
I would rather the Avs stay away from Alzner. I think he is going to age terrible and if its a contract with long term...that could be a disaster</div></div>
Yes Bigras had the concussion this year and didn't make any real ground in his development. Still to me when this team goes out and signs Mironov and Butcher and then you add Meloche to the AHL team... adding a Postma doesn't make sense. Under contract already they have 5 at the NHL level (EJ, Barrie, Barberio, Lindholm and Beauchemin). Lets say Beauch is bought out like he should be and then the obvious signings (Zadorov and Mironov) get done. That gives them 6 already.
Now add whatever D they get in return from a Duchene trade and you're already at 7 D for the NHL. In that situation I'd rather just re-sign a guy like Wiercioch or Goloubef than go out and get Postma. Goloubef is actually the perfect fit there because of his AHL effectiveness. Add him to Bigras, Boikov, Butcher, Geertsen, Meloche and maybe Siemens and that's a real talented AHL blue line.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 avr. 2017 à 13 h 37
Sujet:
Youth Movement, No Pylons, No Trades
Alzner wants both more money and more term than that. Franson is an interesting idea for the Avs though. Lindholm, Mironov, Bigras are all better value and sense for the Avs than signing Postma.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 févr. 2017 à 16 h 1
Sujet:
Is this enough for Duchene?
Quantity does not trump quality. You haven't answered the Avs need for a young high potential defenseman so the answer is no.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 févr. 2017 à 13 h 8
Sujet:
Landy + Tyutin
This is a solid no from Colorado. It's somehow less than they got for O'Reilly despite bargaining from a better position.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 févr. 2017 à 0 h 11
Sujet:
Offseason
Yikes that's some baaaaad value one both of the Avs' key forwards. This would be an all out failure for Sakic and would not only hurt the team in the short term, but in the long term too as they get older worse and don't acquire any futures in the process.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 févr. 2017 à 21 h 28
Sujet:
New Blood
That forward group is abysmal and that defense will last what, a year? 2 years? Before you have to blow it up for cap space. It's totally inefficient to trade your best winger for a defenseman who you're only going to play for 14 minutes a night on the 3rd pairing.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 févr. 2017 à 1 h 45
Sujet:
Duchene
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DirtyDangles</b></div><div><i>Monster overpay for Duchene</i></div></div>
Quantity does not equal quality. Or did you guys want to trade Provorov for: Siemens, Grigorenko, Beaudin, Morrisson and a 2nd. IDK that's a lot of players. Sounds like a monster overpay.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 févr. 2017 à 10 h 53
Sujet:
Moving pieces (STL/COL)
Remember in the old EA NHL games when they would give or take blackberrys away from you depending on how you interacted with other GMs?
They would take one of your phones away if you made that COL offer.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 févr. 2017 à 10 h 52
Sujet:
Landy
JimmyHay is right in that first comment. Likely the only way the Jets are getting Landeskog is with Trouba headed the other way.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 févr. 2017 à 10 h 51
Sujet:
COL CAR
Quantity doesnt trump quality. Avs have already refused better offers than that on Landeskog. Easy no for COL
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com