PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Leaffan57
Membre depuis
25 juill. 2016
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Deuxième équipe favorite
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Messages dans les forums
35
Messages par jour
0.0
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 mai 2019 à 13 h 20
Sujet:
Cap Choices
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leaffan57</b></div><div>The breakdown of what is left is 5 years @ 4.5M, the truth is I would be happy to keep Zaitsev if the Leafs did not have to shed about 5M of CAP space, it appears he is on the first pairing of the Russian team at this time. It is true we cannot predict what he will be 3-4 years from now. I also cannot comment on the evolution of Andrew MacDonald after he signed for 56 years @ 5M. The way I look at it is the Flyers need a #2 Center and the Leafs have one under contract for 3 more years at a reduced rate of 4.5M with history of scoring 30 goals for two years in a row and the style of play that the Flyers are know for. To trade this asset for Laughton is a significant upgrade for the Flyers and suits exactly what they need. It is true there is an extra 4 year commitment to Zaitsev, what would that cost in Prospects! I am not convinced he is a significant drop to Gudas but that can be debated.</div></div>
Sorry, 6 years
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 mai 2019 à 13 h 19
Sujet:
Cap Choices
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DH28Hockey</b></div><div>As someone else here mentioned, Gudas is a better player than Zaitsev, and there’s no way Philly would take on Zaitsevs contract (we learned our lesson HARD with Andrew MacDonald). The only way y’all are getting rid of him is if you send him to a team heavily amidst a rebuild with a pick and a decent prospect. Today’s NHL is all about cap management, and contracts like Zaitsevs really hurt whatever team it’s on</div></div>
The breakdown of what is left is 5 years @ 4.5M, the truth is I would be happy to keep Zaitsev if the Leafs did not have to shed about 5M of CAP space, it appears he is on the first pairing of the Russian team at this time. It is true we cannot predict what he will be 3-4 years from now. I also cannot comment on the evolution of Andrew MacDonald after he signed for 56 years @ 5M. The way I look at it is the Flyers need a #2 Center and the Leafs have one under contract for 3 more years at a reduced rate of 4.5M with history of scoring 30 goals for two years in a row and the style of play that the Flyers are know for. To trade this asset for Laughton is a significant upgrade for the Flyers and suits exactly what they need. It is true there is an extra 4 year commitment to Zaitsev, what would that cost in Prospects! I am not convinced he is a significant drop to Gudas but that can be debated.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 mai 2019 à 12 h 15
Sujet:
Cap Choices
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PJosephM13</b></div><div>Your explanation is very good Zaitsev is amazing on the PK and I think he is underperforming, he could do better.
Thats a fair trade.
If i’m the leafs i add a piece or two to see if I could replace Gudas with Myers.</div></div>
That is a great option but best forward offer would be Bracco, not sure that is enough, no point including either Liljegren or Sandin until we know what we have in them
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 mai 2019 à 12 h 11
Sujet:
Cap Choices
Does this mean you think the trade is fair value wise as Gudas> Zaitsev and Kadri> Laughton? Does it also mean you think the Leaf's must add to pay for 4 extra years on Zaitsev's contract?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 mai 2019 à 11 h 25
Sujet:
Cap Choices
Agree but must reduce CAP load at the same time
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars 2019 à 15 h 28
Sujet:
How can the Leafs stay cap compliant without trading zaitsev
Don’t agree with your thinking that trading Kadri is stupid, think his great contract with three years remaining means the return should be in line with what you are selling! If I had to pick between a 29 year old Kadri who plays behind two studs and can be replaced by Nylander and a 22 year old Nylander the choice for me would easily be to keep Nylander. Kadri is a opportunistic and aggressive player who has scored 30 goals two years in a row, he may do that again but not as the third line center for the leafs, he is a luxury and I believe needs to go either now or later when we need cap space. That does not take away from his value or the great return you would demand
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2018 à 9 h 35
Sujet:
Time to find out what we have in D
Thanks for reply, agree about Kadri but I think that may be an advantage. Kadri is not a puck carrier but he has scored 30+ goals two years in a row. These two wingers, with their speed, will flush out the puck and give him quality chances
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 févr. 2018 à 19 h 59
Sujet:
Is it worth it
So the consensus is this is too much of an overpay?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 févr. 2018 à 19 h 45
Sujet:
Is it worth it
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rangerfan01</b></div><div>I looked up gardiner's stats. 83 giveaways for a defenseman 62 games in is pretty awful. To take that plus a 4 million cap for another year isn't great. Leafs have to add something to sweeten the deal. Rangers already have enough turnover machines on defense.
I think a deal not involving Gardiner would interest rangers, however. Depends what comes back though, and what Lamoriello is willing to part ways with. Liljegren and Marner immediately come up and Rangers would want one of them. And I highly doubt either of them are going anywhere.
In short, a trade between this teams likely won't work.</div></div>
Think you have to look at the three quality prospects instead of Gardiner
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 févr. 2018 à 19 h 43
Sujet:
Is it worth it
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Liamthepro</b></div><div>P.S. "three quality prospects" you have got that right!
Why Borgman and Bracco and a 1st?</div></div>
I breakdown the leafs into groups: they now have 8 quality forwards I would not trade, 4 quality men, including Dermott and Liljegren, and Anderson. The prospects I offered would not affect this and still leave Johnson, Grundstrom and Rasanen! Again, think you have to give to get
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 févr. 2018 à 19 h 36
Sujet:
Is it worth it
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Liamthepro</b></div><div>Not from the Leafs perspective I wouldn't say. At present they have this big, long window in which to contend. Maybe 8-12 years after this one. But McDonagh is signed for one more year (as is Gardiner).
After that next year, you are out Bracco and Borgman and your late 1st from the year before.
Also, now McDonagh makes just a bit more than Jake, but if you want to re-sign him will cost much more.
Also, McDonagh shoots Left and plays LD, and you have traded away two very capable LD to get him, but done nothing about the ugly situation at RD.</div></div>
That is my first reaction but sometimes I think you have to give quality to get quality
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 févr. 2018 à 19 h 33
Sujet:
Is it worth it
To Doug<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Doug7004</b></div><div>Absolutely not! Gardiner straight up too much and I hate Gardiner![/quote
Truth is Doug I have no problem trading Gardiner as I do not rate him as high as you obviously do, the larger question is to compare three quality prospects to two rounds of playoffs with a legitimate number 1 defenseman</div></div>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 févr. 2018 à 17 h 23
Sujet:
karlsson
Any trade that includes one of the big three with 1st round picks has to wait until the summer when it can be a sign and trade to assure Karlsson is here for more than 1 1/2 years
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 févr. 2018 à 14 h 15
Sujet:
RHD or CENTER 2017-18
disappointing after all that work, will try to rebuild later, too much right now
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 févr. 2018 à 14 h 6
Sujet:
RHD or CENTER 2017-18
Hi all, lost my two other proposals for 2018-19 and 2019-20 when I published this one, don't know why!!!!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 août 2017 à 18 h 17
Sujet:
Seems like a good match
Price: Not sure what you mean, JVR is there because Toronto has to make room for Kapanen to play so one of JVR or Bozak could be traded, Washington is already set at center so JVR seems a better fit, yes the Leafs are giving prospects, I suppose a later draft pick could be added if that closes the deal, they could also add lower level prospects such as Lindberg and/or Valiev but then Washington will have to worry about the 50 contracts. I understand your point about quality for quality but Washington is in this spot and Toronto can solve it. This deal does not work for Toronto if they must give up prospects who have not shown their true worth yet, ie Dermott, Neilsen, Bracco, Brooks, etc. This deal is not crucial for Toronto, they can just wait for which of the 5-6 quality defence prospects will improve and join the three they already have, this is just an opportunity that exists that they might capitalize on
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 août 2017 à 17 h 35
Sujet:
Seems like a good match
Price: That may be but then Washington has to find a way to get from 17 players to 22 players with 4M in Cap space
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 août 2017 à 17 h 33
Sujet:
Seems like a good match
Biilius: I agree but I think that is what is great about the deal, if you don't overpay it can be a one year rental of Carlson for a one year rental of JVR with the cost of three RFAs with upside. The deal is even better if Carlson becomes indispensable and replaces Gardiner, that means we get two years of them before Gardiner moves on as the kids get better and take his place. I think you had the right idea
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 août 2017 à 17 h 20
Sujet:
Seems like a good match
To palhal: Yes I have retained salary but that is to allow Washington to hold on to it's CAP money to further add to their team because they are trading the better player. Yes I moved two 5/6 defencemen but that is required to help Washington solve their problem. Toronto has the five prospects of which any could make the jump, especially Dermott or Rosen, they also have Valiev that may be ready. We are not creating a significant hole, we are improving the Top Four defence at minimal cost, you may be right that Marchenko is not ready but that remains to be seen
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 août 2017 à 17 h 15
Sujet:
Seems like a good match
To Price_is_the_goat: those additions defeat the point of the deal, Bracco is a valuable prospect for the future when the likes of Kadri, Brown and Hyman become too expensive to keep as part of the core, that would create a hole while filling another, the sign and trade would be up to Washington as their future Cap situation may not allow them to afford JVR
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 févr. 2017 à 16 h 11
Sujet:
LEAFS INCREDIBLE WINDOW
Thanks
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 févr. 2017 à 9 h 50
Sujet:
LEAFS INCREDIBLE WINDOW
Sorry, thanks for the comment
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 févr. 2017 à 9 h 48
Sujet:
LEAFS INCREDIBLE WINDOW
Hi, wondering if you read the description
Cost of signing Matthews approx. 8M above current, Marner approx 5M above current, Gardiner Approx 1.5 above current, Total 15M max
Savings from: Kadri 4.5M, Martin 2.5M, Horton LTIR 5.3M, Extra 5 players shown at approx. 0.8M each, Total 16M
Kapanen, not being one of the core pieces would have a two year bridge contract only in 2019
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 déc. 2016 à 18 h 21
Sujet:
Leaf fan to Habs fans
It is possible that I mis- understand the status of Plekanec and Deharnais, I view both of them as non- factor players and a drain on the Habs cap situation, if this is not the case then the proposed trade was wrong. The thought was in upgrading both those players for 1 1/2 years while Price is in his prime years.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 juill. 2016 à 8 h 5
Sujet:
Dream Defence
Thanks, can see by rating that idea not well received, Hunwick was to replace Stoner at a reduced rate, Dermott is the Leafs highest rated defensive prospect
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com