PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
K_Hab
Membre depuis
7 juill. 2019
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Messages dans les forums
117
Messages par jour
0.1
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2019 à 11 h 11
Sujet:
Random Krug Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>ah. okay. I see the problem here.
Group one, literally means that you are off your ELC. Countless resources can tell you this, but I don't think you need to go there. It is called a group 1 RFA. RFA stands for restricted free agent. There are two big examples of that this year, Boeser, and McAvoy. Both are acknowledged by all the media guys as exactly what they are, group one restricted free agents.
If group 1 RFA meant that you were still on your entry level deal, why would it be called group 1 rfa? why would it be called anything? Why wouldn't it just be called the players entry level deal?</div></div>
I've got the CBA right in front of me:
Subject to subsection (c) below, the period covered by the SPC for every Rookie,
and the number of years that such Player will be in the Entry Level System and subject to the
compensation limits set out in this Article, shall be as indicated on the chart immediately below,
and during such period, the Player shall be deemed to be a "Group 1 Player":
First SPC Signing Age
Period Covered by First SPC
and Years in the Entry Level System
and Subject to Compensation Limits
18-21 3 years
22-23 2 years
24 1 year
25 and older No required number of years, not in the Entry Level
System and not subject to limits on compensation
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2019 à 11 h 1
Sujet:
Random Krug Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>K. But he's still a group 1. That's literally why he's group 1. Because he was 19 when he signed, he didn't have a year tacked on his entry deal, which is why he's a group 1. Everyone acknowledges this except a couple bad writers that don't know what they're talking about.
Evolving Wild (trash guesswork), has him at a .2% chance of signing a 1 year deal. A lot of group 1 RFAs sign 1 year deals. They have him at 6 years and 7 million. That doesn't say anything about a 2 year deal. A 2 year deal is a totally different world of contract negotiations.</div></div>
Group 1 "Literally" mean's you're still on your ELC...McAvoy is not, he is now a group 2 RFA...Where are these plethora of people who acknowledge BS? even CapFriendly doesn't as they have him as RFA coming off his ELC...Also for Evolving Wild...try scrolling over to the right a bit and see what they project salary wise for each year term.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2019 à 10 h 38
Sujet:
Random Krug Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>well, because he is still group 1. Have to play ten regular season games for the season to count towards RFA rights chief. Group 1. Is this where I'm supposed to say, "LOL?"
Also evolving wild isn't that accurate. I think they had Nylander at like 4.8 million. whoops. They had Karlsson at what? 9.5ish? nope. Duchene at under 7. They had williams signing a 3 year deal with a 9% chance of him signing for 8 years.</div></div>
They were close on Zuccarello, Myers, Lee, Eberle, Myers ...all contracts around the range where Mcavoy will sign
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2019 à 10 h 33
Sujet:
Random Krug Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>well, because he is still group 1. Have to play ten regular season games for the season to count towards RFA rights chief. Group 1. Is this where I'm supposed to say, "LOL?"
Also evolving wild isn't that accurate. I think they had Nylander at like 4.8 million. whoops. They had Karlsson at what? 9.5ish? nope. Duchene at under 7. They had williams signing a 3 year deal with a 9% chance of him signing for 8 years.</div></div>
"In the event that an 18 year old or 19 year old Player signs an SPC with a
Club but does not play at least ten (10) NHL Games in the first season
under that SPC, the term of his SPC and his number of years in the Entry
Level System shall be extended for a period of one (1) year, except that
this automatic extension will not apply to a Player who is 19 according to
Section 9.2 by virtue of turning 20 between September 16 and December
31 in the year in which he first signs an SPC. Unless a Player and Club
expressly agree to the contrary, in the event a Player's SPC is extended an
additional year in accordance with this subsection, all terms of the SPC,
with the exception of Signing Bonuses, but including Paragraph 1 Salary,
games played bonuses and Exhibit 5 bonuses, shall be extended; provided,
however, that the Player's Paragraph 1 Salary shall be extended in all
circumstances.
He was 19 so exempt and he has a December Birthday
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2019 à 10 h 27
Sujet:
Random Krug Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>cool. evolving wild stinks. guarantee you they have no idea what a group 1 RFA is. come up with your own reason. Why does McAvoy get that much on a 2 year deal when it's the most player friendly term, and he has zero leverage.</div></div>
LOL...He signed his ELC at 19 years old and it's been 3 years since, he's a group 2 RFA. Evolving wild has for the most part been within 1% with their predictions. I presented you with numbers, the onus is on you to show why you think he is worth less without spewing BS.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2019 à 7 h 55
Sujet:
Random Krug Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>McAvoy. Is. A. Group. 1. RFA.
explain him getting 5.5 on a two year deal.</div></div>
<a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15E1qqh3OfHvvhbv_pICfKT7VR1jJEVhWQOyKviWLN54/edit#gid=707766415" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15E1qqh3OfHvvhbv_pICfKT7VR1jJEVhWQOyKviWLN54/edit#gid=707766415</a>
Evolving wild has crunched the numbers.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2019 à 7 h 51
Sujet:
Random Krug Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>way too much for carlo and mcavoy at those terms. cut the contracts almost in half.</div></div>
Unless they take a home team discount, Mcavoy will get about 5.5M on a 2 year term and Carlo about 2.6M. That's about 2M difference not 4M.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2019 à 14 h 12
Sujet:
Can Habs trade for Hall and Vantanen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>I don't really know about the Hall situation - but sounds awfully similar to Tavares last year. I don't think it is for lack of money...Hall wants to play on playoff team. Problem for MTL...if you subtract this many assets from roster, would Hall resign?
Maybe send them Caufield to reunite with Hughes. :hushed</div></div>
If they would do it sure, but Drouin currently has much more value than Caufield.
I like your Idea of making the picks conditional upon Hall re-signing. I think the Habs are still a solid team minus those assets.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2019 à 14 h 2
Sujet:
VGK MTL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>slapshot723</b></div><div>Highway robbery? Come on, man. Leddy's a damn good player.</div></div>
I think he mean's for the Habs. Evans projects as a bottom 6 player right now, and Hudon is a 4th line player at best.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2019 à 13 h 58
Sujet:
Can Habs trade for Hall and Vantanen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>This would be a pretty exciting trade...I imagine NJD would ask for Kotkaniemi instead of Drouin.
Would make the picks conditional on Hall resigning.</div></div>
Kotkaniemi instead of Drouin would be a definite deal breaker. Chances are that NJ is going to have a hard time signing Hall and Vantanen anyway, so the Habs are helping them out by getting younger players on cheaper deals plus 2 firsts.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2019 à 13 h 55
Sujet:
Can Habs trade for Hall and Vantanen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HabsForEver</b></div><div>That deal isn't worth it to Montreal.</div></div>
Maybe not in the longterm, but this coming season it would definitely make them better.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2019 à 13 h 49
Sujet:
Can Habs trade for Hall and Vantanen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LumberJacques</b></div><div>Tricky part would be re-signing Hall and Domi next year.</div></div>
Petry would have to be traded for sure and 2 of (Tatar, Armia, Leks or Byron). Fleury should be ready for NHL at least to fill a RHD position, we just have to hope we'd have enough depth to fill out the bottom 6.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2019 à 13 h 44
Sujet:
Gusev Signings
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Chopper02</b></div><div>It's not a small price to pay anymore. Also, when Panarin came into the league he was 23 and still had room to grow. Gusev is 27. 4 years doesn't sound like a lot, but it is. He's not going to grow. Some team will take a gamble on him for a couple 2nds maybe, or like I said, a B level prospect and a 2nd.</div></div>
We'll see what he goes for, but like I said, there will be at least one team willing to gamble on him if they think it makes them contenders.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2019 à 12 h 38
Sujet:
Gusev Signings
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Chopper02</b></div><div>Of course teams have scouted him. But when he's never played on anything other than Olympic sized ice rinks, people are wary of paying a big price for him. Teams for the most part are reluctant to trade 1sts and risk not having one if it doesn't pan out. Why do you think Winnipeg wanted theirs back so badly?</div></div>
Scouting means they project the player's potential in the NHL. Team's that are rebuilding are wary of their first, but the goal is to win the cup. If a few team's think that Gusev can be the piece that makes them a contender (i.e. turning their powerplay into more of a threat) then a first will be a small price to pay.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2019 à 12 h 25
Sujet:
Gusev Signings
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Chopper02</b></div><div>Disagree. At most a B level prospect and an assumed late 2nd rounder. That's about it considering he has no NHL experience and the fact Vegas can't negotiate for a big increase. He could be Panarin or Dadonov or end up being like Nichushkin or Shipachyov.</div></div>
Team's will have scouted him already, I mean a lot of team's have full time scouts in the KHL. There will be a bidding war if team's really like the player, and if that happens it will likely be a first going the other way.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2019 à 12 h 17
Sujet:
Weber V2
So this is Byfuglien for Weber...and Gallagher, Tatar, Lek for Laine. I mean maybe, but why would WPG trade one aging elite Dman for another? doesn't make sense.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2019 à 10 h 31
Sujet:
Rebuilt
We're not getting Ehlers for that and Ottawa is not taking Alzner unless there is a significant piece with it. Also, they would be over the contract limit with that many players going the other way.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2019 à 9 h 11
Sujet:
Adding Marner
Yikes that's a lot of money tied up in two wingers.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2019 à 9 h 9
Sujet:
Playing around tear me up
Why does every Bruins fan want to get rid of Krug?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2019 à 9 h 2
Sujet:
Probably would never happen but Slavin
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sammy_daws1997</b></div><div>Carolina fans say that the leafs would need to give up Matthews for Slavin so we know how reasonable they can be around him...</div></div>
Look, Habs fans have biases towards their players and Canes fans have biases towards theirs. I'm pretty sure that I have exaggerated the trade in the Canes favor, but that's what it would take to pry a Defenceman that we need from a team that doesn't want to part ways with.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2019 à 8 h 55
Sujet:
Probably would never happen but Slavin
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HabsForEver</b></div><div>Not only are Caufield and Romanov both great prospects, we are also giving up one of the best defensive centers in the league (very good 5v5 scorer) and a 2nd round pick. This trade is definitely a massive overpayment</div></div>
Like I said, to us Habs fans this is an overpayment, but look at the Carolina fans reaction above. Carolina needs an incentive to part with their top Dman (because they don't want to give him up) and Slavin is a player that would put Montreal over the top I think. I think Poehling can develop quicker into what Danault is already, maybe one to 2 seasons away.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2019 à 8 h 47
Sujet:
Probably would never happen but Slavin
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ragnarok7</b></div><div>Slavin isn't worth that much, come on !</div></div>
It's subjective. Slavin is definitely underrated and what he does on the ice is not represented by his points. Carolina doesn't really have anyone to replace Slavin's minutes unless they think Fleury and Bean are ready, but Habs fans will think this is an overpay because they understand that Romanov and Caufield are some of Mtl's top prospects and will be part of the core moving forward. Carolina fans probably don't know who those players are yet and so they see this as a trade for Danault and "throwaway pieces".
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
9 juill. 2019 à 5 h 39
Sujet:
MTL Futur Superteam
Stay away from Laine. One dimensional sniper’s are not what this team need right now. Run with the youth and bide your time until either Romanov comes over or an interesting trade proposal comes up for a top 4....this team as it stands is a playoff team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 juill. 2019 à 20 h 8
Sujet:
Another Drouin Attempt
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>coga16</b></div><div>Summary Drouin was too muscular and bulked up too much much so that’s why his scoring fell off at the end of the year, that he is better defensively than Rantanen, comparing stamina with kessel, comparing him to Kane marner aho, But is so solid defenviely that they save his minutes not playing the pk, bc you know he’s too strong from bulking up</div></div>
Summary, you have reading comprehension issues, the habs don’t want your garbage and you’re pretty lousy at evaluating players. Well, i’m bored here, see you next year hahahaha.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 juill. 2019 à 19 h 33
Sujet:
Another Drouin Attempt
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>coga16</b></div><div>Drouin is a complete player who couldnt be trusted to play Top 6 minutes during the final playoff push for the Habs bc hes weak defensively....right thats a complete player. Just rock solid who does it all, oh right he is the opposite. You compare Drouin to top end elite offensive players who may score well beyond Drouin and are better defensively than drouin as well....Marner is 10 times the more complete player, Marner even kills penalite, whens the lat time Drouin has been asked to do that?
Oh right Drouins issue was he was just too strong, thats why he disappeared for the last 23 games of the season...do you realize that players lose weight during the season hahah, Drouin bulkd up and he was just too big . That might be the funniest excuse I have ever heard on this site</div></div>
Lol his issue was stamina is too far fetched for you...ok there, case in point Kessel. “Players lose weight during the season” ...Einstein here...what i’m Saying is he trained for a different purpose, you know, like athletes do sometimes ( or do you not know sports) a soccer player is not going to train like a football player...a linebacker is not going to train like a quarterback....and...wait for it....a center is not going to train like a winger...BINGO. Drouin’s offense fell off and that was why he was relegated to 3rd line minutes....The defence portion was irrelevant because the coach was trying to get his offense back going. It was a poor decision because KK was losing steam in his first full season as well...he should have been paired with Domi and Shaw.
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com