SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

JTBF81

Membre depuis
23 juill. 2019
Équipe favorite
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Deuxième équipe favorite
Avalanche du Colorado
Messages dans les forums
2517
Messages par jour
1.4
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 1 minute
Sujet: Controversial trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Maniaked</b></div><div>Our defense is not our only problem, depth scoring as been an issue all year. Losing Cirelli really hurts that. Losing him would also hurt our defense because he is so good defensively. Cirelli is a huge part of one of the best PK in the league. Sure we desperately need a top 4 defenceman but giving up Cirelli would not make our team better.</div></div>

The defense is by far, the main problem. Tampa's ga/g has gone from 2.86 to 3.07 to 3.26 the last 3 seasons, while.gf/g has stayed pretty constant, 3.48, 3.41, 3.51. Yes, depth scoring was an issue, but trading Cirelli for say Anderson not only adds an upgrade on defense and some scoring to help replace Cirwlli, but would also allow the team to add another decent ufa F in addition to Duclair. Someone like Sprong, Foegle, Joshua, etc could potentially be acquired with additional cap space in this scenario. It's unlikely as Tampa seems committed to Cirelli, but it does not downgrade the team in theory.
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 2 heures
Sujet: Controversial trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Maniaked</b></div><div>I agree that a top4 D is crucial but Cirelli provides great defense and good depth scoring. We can't afford of losing him either. We have nobody else that would be good on that second line. I rather trade Paul for someone like Fabbro. Paul is replacable while Cirelli is not.</div></div>

Paul is a great 3C, but as long as Stamkos stays, he can play 2C again without an issue. Moving Paul for an upgrade at 3RD makes Cirelli have to play 3C and Stamkos 2C anyway, as there's no one else to then play 3C. Tampa can also likely be able to.spend around 2.5 in ufa on a 3RD upgrade, so there's no reason to move Paul for one. If Cirelli could be used for a dman that is a true top 4 that can give the team some semblance of what they had on the blueline a few years ago and pkssibly save them enough space to add a solid F in addition to Duclair, I believe JBB would at least consider it.
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 9 heures
Sujet: TBL 24-25 keeping Stamkos v3
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bast</b></div><div>I would argue that Andersson at $4.5M is the better value
Over the last 3 years:
Andersson 239GP, 24G, 138P, +24
Sergachev 191GP, 19G, 121P, +3

Sergachev also has a lot better offensive talent to work with.

As for Cirelly being better than Mangiapane. I'd take Mangiapane because he isn't signed for another 7 years at $6.2M with a Career high of 45P. At least Mangiapane scored 35G in a season before.

Perbix vs Pachal both are throw-ins, so you get my point.</div></div>

Sergachev got hurt; otherwise, he'd likely be ahead in most stats. They're comparable though. Cirelli is better overall than Mangiapane, and improved offensively this year. If he had more power play time, he'd also have more points I'm sure. Him being signed through his prime years, with a steadily rising cap, at 6.25, is a solid contract for a 2C. Maybe Tampa adds something else, as I originally had a prospect of some level in there as well, but the trade is far from terrible. Now if Calgary isn't interested because of positional needs, that's fine, but if Tampa does make Cirelli available, it's for a top 4 dman or the assets to acquire one. Otherwise, they are good with the player they have
Forum: Armchair-GMsam. à 16 h 57
Sujet: The sea was angry that day my friends
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>Sheary has a ntc. Also you'd have to replace all 3 players. Also they don't get anywhere near the return cirelli does</div></div>

Sheary has a m-ntc starting this offseason where he can be dealt to half the league. Replacing 3 meh players isn't an issue, and Tampa will still save 2.5-3 million moving them. They'll have ~17.5 million in space if they move all 3(before adding in replacement costs), and they likely won't care that much about the return as the added space is more valuable.

Replacing Cirelli is far more difficult, and they aren't getting another top 6 player for much cheaper than what Cirelli costs. He's slightly overpaid, but with the cap increasing, his contract should look.bwtter and better as the years go on. Even if Tampa was listening to offers on him(which I doubt), a magic bean draft pick, a 2nd and a 4th liner isn't it. Tampa should be looking to add on the blueline, where they have been struggling ghe past couple of seasons. If a team offered up.a legit top 4 dman(preferably an RD) as the main piece in the deal, perhaps Tampa would have some interest. Otherwise, it should be a hard pass from Tampa.
Forum: Armchair-GM20 avr. à 14 h 11
Sujet: TBL offseason moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>johnjeffcena</b></div><div>trading sheary and pics for future considerations makes absolutely no sense and probably a worse trade than the jeannot trade to put him into tampa; which trading jeannot for a price that low would also lead us to be scammed</div></div>

Sheary has negative value and has been one of the worst signings that JBB has ever made. His 2 million cap hit is badly needed elsewhere this offseason, so if a mid round pick or two is needed to move him, no problem. Jeannot has been a bust. It was a massive overpay and the player that JBB and the scouts thought they were getting isn't the player he really is. He fights well, but is nothing special offensively nor.defensively. He's also been very injury prone, as he's missed more time in a season and change than most. It's a loss of a trade anyway one looks at it, but they might as well try and recoup something and be able to re-allocate 2.665 million of valuable cap space in the process on areas of greater importance.