SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Echlz

Membre depuis
5 juin 2023
Équipe favorite
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Deuxième équipe favorite
Bruins de Boston
Messages dans les forums
194
Messages par jour
0.5
Forum: Armchair-GM27 juin 2023 à 11 h 8
Sujet: Report that the Capitals are in talks with Ottawa
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Green4D4</b></div><div>LOL what? Shift Norris to the Wing. Keep the cheap contracts and retain your youth long term rather than trade for a fragile, 29 year old on an expiring contract... Keep the depth rather than spend it all on 1 guy at the draft.

If the Sens are in a position to win at the deadline, I can understand a move like this. But this is non-sensical.</div></div>

Fragile??? He had one injury and he recovered from it to play a good amount of games towards the end of the season last year, I would say he is the opposite of Fragile and he is also in his prime, so I don't quite know where you are headed with your accusation. In all honesty I would rather keep Wilson, but if he is traded that is the package I would expect.
Forum: Armchair-GM20 juin 2023 à 11 h 59
Forum: Armchair-GM19 juin 2023 à 14 h 46
Sujet: Offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xspyrit</b></div><div>Remove Brannstrom and I'd do it. Not really interested in trading Brannstrom as his value is back on the rise.

1st + 2nd + 4th is the absolute MAX I'd go for Hart

I wouldn't mind exploring the million other options if it doesn't work.


You didn't notice the 6 years? That would be banking on his potential but there's absolutely no need to do that. Bridge him 2 years and then sign him long term. He's not going to put huge numbers the next 2 seasons because there's many guys in front of him for offensive situations (PP, etc)


Easy PASS actually

Brannstrom is actually pretty good at this thing called hockey


This is also external fans not having a clue of other teams player's values</div></div>

That last part, could go both ways. If OTT wants a 24 year old franchise goalie who continuously carries bad teams and has over 200 games under his belt already, you'll have to pay more than a 1st, 2nd, and 4th. You may be the only one who wouldn't easily accept that offer, so that doesn't say much there about you not valuing other teams players correctly either.

Franchise goalies don't grow on tress, but I am pretty sure I shared on another post here, that goalies usually don't get the haul they deserve, which is why trading goalies of Hart's ilk is so rare.

OTT can keep the 1st and the rest of the trash and struggle to find consistency in the net for the next 10 years. Forsberg isn't the answer obv and nothing in your system shows any promise either. Maybe Sogaard can turn into something but he didn't look necessarily good this year either.
Forum: Armchair-GM16 juin 2023 à 11 h 21
Sujet: Maple Buds
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Toronto_Hockey</b></div><div>Winnipeg and Toronto are in similar boats in terms of their core, failed playoff appearances. Your going to lose the Marner trade irregardless of the return on paper...
I don't know how much more Toronto can expect in return for 16, we've just seen that clearly a 100pt guy isn't required to win (Chandler Stephenson VGK 65in81). I think teams are slowly moving away from the production aspect and more the playoff / intangibles factor.
Just my take!</div></div>

Very well stated. You're a Leafs fan? Wow. Impressive. Most Leafs fans seem to think that Marner is beyond every player on the Jets combined.

VGK has definitely proved again, that it's a team game that battling gamers need to play, not just great point producing players.