PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
8
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
exo2769
exo2769
Membre depuis
28 juill. 2015
Équipe favorite
Blackhawks de Chicago
Messages dans les forums
15684
Messages par jour
4.9
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 4 heures
Sujet:
All for Nothing Part 8
Come on ChiHawk. Don't kick them when they're down.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 19 heures
Sujet:
Punishing PLD
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>CHI is nowhere near the same point with Reichel as LAK is with Kaliyev. That is a false equivalency, and there is no way to justify that. There is definitely a case to be made for CHI having interest in Kaliyev, though.
PLD will cost significantly more to move. That is still one of the biggest head scratcher trade AND contracts of the last few years. Someone brought up the Flames with Huberdeau, but they were essentially forced to get the best deal possible for Tkachuk, at which point it just made sense to re-sign Huber. LAK's traded too many assets for a mid 2nd line center, that probably won't age very well and already has a history of asking for trades and overplaying his hand.</div></div>
Friedman was discussing the LAK possibly buying him out immediately after the Cup Finals if they end early because he's still only 25 years old so his buyout would be 1/3 the contract vs 2/3.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 15 h 49
Sujet:
Punishing PLD
Hawks aren't interested in PLD and while I'd take a flyer on Kaliyev...it won't be for Reichel. Understood he didn't have a good year, but we're not interested in trading him away. What about Isaak Phillips? Physical LD.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 10 h 22
Sujet:
Final tweaks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Retain Schmidt down to $4m and the Hawks probably accept. Or remove the retention and swap the 3rd forza 2nd.</div></div>
We have the cap space. I'd say the route toward the 2nd is more realistic.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 9 h 6
Sujet:
becoming competitive
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ecupirate07</b></div><div>Canes would? Aging small winger isn’t what we need</div></div>
Yeah, but you can't beat that contract. 6 years for what would be one of the best contracts in the league. Also, Johnny could be free to be Johnny in CAR. He's not the main focus like he is with CBJ. He'll have more open ice in CAR to do what he does.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
jeu. à 15 h 25
Sujet:
move from the 5 to the 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shanesaw9</b></div><div>You could probably take out the Colorado 2nd and that would still be considered fair value... question is why? There's a legitimate chance Demidov is available at 5, Michkov didn't go until 7th last year.</div></div>
I agree that the real question for both teams is why. It'll be a tough spot. MTL will HAVE to think there's a clear guy a #2 and CHI would have to be indifferent for the guys 2-5. The Hawks need high end talent more than shear picks. We have more picks than MTL right now anyway. I'm talking to other Hawks fans about us possibly being already at the point where were almost forced to move up in the draft because you simply can't draft everyone in a draft.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
jeu. à 13 h 46
Sujet:
Oh baby this is a just for fun look into my crytal balls
New Coach...Quenneville?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
jeu. à 11 h 39
Sujet:
Bigger step next summer
This doesn't feel like rushing our prospects to you? Moore/Demidov zero time in Rockford?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
jeu. à 9 h 40
Sujet:
Bored
In all sincerity, if he'd accept a 2 year deal I'd pay him $12M per and give him the same total amount of money for a year less of service. Heck, for a 2 year deal I'd consider more as well.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 10 h 34
Sujet:
Would CHI consider this
I hope not. We need physical veterans specifically on the right side because well be icing 3 very young dmen on the left.
Truth be told, I want them to sign another physical veteran on the right...not get rid of one.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 8 h 34
Sujet:
Rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JK74</b></div><div>Ehlers is worth that to some team but Chicago isn't at that point yet.</div></div>
And the CHI 1st...idk. for 2 years of just about anyone, that's rich.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 19 h 20
Sujet:
Wings
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaquille_Oatmeal</b></div><div>Why the heck would they do that? You ain't gonna find a Raymond level player with pick #20.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>This is definitely not realistic but we easily accept this. Raymond is a stud, and I'd totally take the chance on Berggren too</div></div>
I'm not so sure they do. Maybe my "obviously" was a bit harsh, but that's a lot of draft picks and while Raymond is good. It's rushing a rebuild. Raymond is a good player, but I don't think they rush the rebuild unless it's for a great player.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 18 h 27
Sujet:
Saros
As a Hawks fan. I'd do this. Send Reaves and Timmins to Rockford. Timmy could be nice. We don't have a lot in the farm system for RD.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 18 h 24
Sujet:
Wings
Obviously the Hawks pass.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 18 h 23
Sujet:
Hawks delusional fantasy
Please provide your source. I see a LEAFS fan making a Hawks trade of Marner for Jones the TOR 1st a TOR 2nd.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 17 h 32
Sujet:
Doing All 32 Teams Realistic Offseasons Knights
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>youngmoney</b></div><div>thats fair maybe throw in a lower pick to chicago then? why wouldnt they take him on an expiring and take a chance that he returns to form and capitalize on his value come deadline time. seems good to me</div></div>
Because of a few reasons. It's ALOT of risk. He hasn't played in over 2 years already and you don't do favors for free. Hawks already have Mrazek for the starter role and three goalies that need NHL ice time.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 17 h 14
Sujet:
Doing All 32 Teams Realistic Offseasons Knights
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>youngmoney</b></div><div>if he does come back chicago could use him (they have more then enough money to) or if he dosent then he just stays on ltir? why would vegas pay to get off it</div></div>
Because they need the cap space if he's trying to make a comeback. They need to be cap complaint on day 1 of next season. Means they can't use that $5M in cap if he's coming back.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 16 h 7
Sujet:
Doing All 32 Teams Realistic Offseasons Knights
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Logicalicesports</b></div><div>Lehner is LTIRetired. His cap doesn't count</div></div>
Some are thinking he's trying to make a comeback because he's got money issues. I have zero inside knowledge. Just what I read.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 16 h 6
Sujet:
Doing All 32 Teams Realistic Offseasons Knights
You fooled me on the realistic...good one! Lehner hasn't played a game in over 2 years, carries a cap hit of $5M and salary of $4.5M. It took a 2nd round pick for the Hawks to take on Josh Bailey and buy him out. You want us to PAY a 6th rounder to pay $4.5M for Lehner? Try sending the Hawks a 2nd+ in order for that to work.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 16 h 1
Sujet:
DRAFT DAY
As a Hawks fan, I'm in favor of this move if Davidson likes someone available at #17. We've got the picks to use in order to get the specific guys we're targeting.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 15 h 11
Sujet:
Is it worth the gamble
Nah, stay the course. 7 years left!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 8 h 26
Sujet:
Team takes a haircut to stay together
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hedman4Norris</b></div><div>I mean Stamkos has a career networth of $100 million
While Jake has a career networth of $15 million
I'm sure the money means more to debrusk</div></div>
And Stamkos has given discounts to Tampa every step of the way. Do you really think he couldn't have got more than $8.5M? For you guys I hope he stays. For him, I hope he explores other options.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 15 h 58
Sujet:
Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PaulKorea</b></div><div>Maybe if you scrap the picks going to Toronto you could get the Hawks to accept. Maybe.</div></div>
That's too much going to the Hawks imo. The #23 OA pick is a pretty dang good pick. Reaves is just a $450k buyout and TOR can dump Kampf for a 2nd rounder. Leafs fans would argue a 3rd, but that's probably not realistic. We have the picks to roll the dice like this and Reaves can go to Rockford. Be a protector down there for our prospects.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 15 h 4
Sujet:
Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>lol. I was literally just building an ACGM with almost the same exact proposals. I don't think this is too much at all, though. Something like this coincides with what KD has stated in his exit interview about improving the team, while still maintaining some of the more important guidelines he has laid out for the rebuild over the last two years.
Aside from Pesce (which is far too much salary and term, imo) you have brought in some veteran players on short term deals, made the NHL club more competitive, created roster competition for the young guys who may or may not need more development time in the AHL (and are still waiver exempt and shouldn't just be handed roster spots), and brings in more/higher-quality draft capital. All while bringing in more guys who are not injury prone, and who, presumably, are only worried about themselves and their next contracts. They are all guys who can motivate a locker room, take orders and play within a system, and are great team first guys, aside from maybe Mikheyev.
I think as far as Mikheyev goes, though, I would rather just re-sign Anderson. We don't NEED the extra 2nd round pick and Anderson has been fantastic. And for Pesce, I think for $6.5 x 5, we can probably do better than him, or just do something shorter term. Not that he isn't serviceable, but he has shown signs of decline and 5 years is a long time, especially for that amount. That contract has some potential to look pretty bad pretty quickly.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>newman23</b></div><div>I woiuld prefer the hawks only make one of these types of moves (I definitely dont the idea of picking up anders lee). I think what Jones and Foligno said during their exit interviews is important - we need to have vets that actually want to be here and buy into trying to rebuild the blackhawks. I think picking up the worst contracts from playoff teams is a generally not a great way to get a guy that cares about the project in Chicago. Theres plenty of good veteran presence that will be available in free agency. I'd rather us target guys a little more intentionally. We dont really need the extra picks anyway.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>I don't see Davidson plugging up that many holes for the young guys, especially with all these deals being multi year this is just way too much imo</div></div>
The only thing I'd say with the picks is that we need to be trying to move up in the draft if we're getting picks. I fully understand if you don't want Mikheyev...ok. That's fine with me. Maybe it's a Faksa? Maybe it's someone else. My point was simply that I'm ok with having a Brett Connolley down in Rockford. Guys that aren't coming here by choice, but also don't want to skip out on their NHL contract. Faksa can help lead the Ice Hogs. I'm ok with that. Maybe it's Reeves? He's a "locker room" guy. OK, be that for our prospects. Sign Pitlick to a max AHL contract...whatever that is...I honestly forget. Spend the money to set up these young guys to develop into NHLers at the AHL level.
Anders Lee to me is different. He's a Captain. I'm sure he wants to win a cup, but when he and his wife (from Chicago) sit down and talk about their family, life, and future...it's not at all an impossibility that CHI is an acceptable location. He's still an ok hockey player. Just paid a lot for what he provides.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 13 h 39
Sujet:
Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>remowilliams</b></div><div>Canucks pass.IMHO.</div></div>
I've been seeing a lot of Mikheyev dumps. They might be able to get someone else to take less. Kyle Davidson's track record is pretty clear that he'll probably do it, but a 2nd will need to be involved. Maybe like the Dickinson trade...we could send a prospect back like Entwistle (just as an example)?
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com