SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

DavidKociFanClub

Remember David Koci
Membre depuis
23 juill. 2021
Équipe favorite
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Messages dans les forums
12
Messages par jour
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GM26 juill. 2021 à 22 h 9
Sujet: Dumb Idiot DNVR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DavidKociFanClub</b></div><div>OOOF with a capital O, sure man, your whole dissertation that lets you sidestep being criticised on value aside, let's dig into this eh?

Alright, so we're operating based off of how GM's behave and how the NHL acts in reality, right? Lovely. Would love to know your thought process behind somehow convincing analytics darling Jake McCabe to sign a one year 2.5M deal. Is Sakic going to walk in and bully him over the year he lost to injury? While I'd love to join you in the stars wherever you pulled this term and dollar amount from, I am unfortunately bound to keep myself and my ideas down here on planet Earth, and would encourage you to do the same. Have you seen what Defensemen are getting these days? Suter's about to score 4 years and you think McCabe will pick up 1?? Let alone at 2.5? OOF

It's not about a value here, as much as it a fallacy, when it comes to this NY trade. Maybe Burnaby Joe puts on the silver tongue and pulls Schneider away. I think you're making the wrong read on NY, "Made bad move x therefor they'll make bad move Y" is some prettttttty faulty logic. Drury trading Buch saved him some cap space and got rid of an unsigned asset, maybe he does the same with Chytil, but it doesn't necessarily look like NY is selling off for selling off's sake as much as it looks they're trying to capitalize on assets they don't think they'll be able to sign (no matter how misguided). They just got rid of Deangelo on the back end, and they literally signed the kid back in March of this year. Maybe there's an argument to be made for Drury being willing to move him bc he wasn't GM then, but he was associate GM, it's not like he's a fresh face. I don't buy it. The Chytil addition, sure, but there's been rumors floating around that they've been wanting to extend a QO his way for a few weeks. Some faulty logic at best here, pretty sure they shoot this one down (not because of value, because it doesn't make hockey sense). Feel free to elaborate on this one though.

This NSH trade, David Poile is going to trade his starting goaltender and top offensive producer to a division rival under the pretense that he's got a prospect *maybe 1-2* years away without a single bona fide blue chip prospect coming back? God bless the IRL GM who decides to go all in on a goalie prospect without seeing what they've got, we all know that works out so well (*cough* *cough* Markstrom *cough* *cough* Chris Gibson *cough* *cough* Malcolm Subban). NSH Knows how to develop goalies, Call Poile the farmer because he knows a thing or two because he's seen a thing or two — he's also shown he doesn't put prospects into the fire unless he's certain they can handle it, and he doesn't make trades that'll put him in a conspicuous position without knowing he's got abundance to back him up. One good goalie prospect ain't abundance. This trade seems unrealistic, maybe a year or two from now, but right now, it doesn't cut it. Poile's not dealing one-on-one with a division rival like this unless he's certain he's coming out on top ESPECIALLY after the Girard trade (which again, was a move made out of abundance, as NSH had plenty of blue chip D at the time). I'm also fairly certain NSH has plenty of players like Martin Kaut, in fact — I'm pretty sure that's where Martin Kaut's spawn.

Don't know why Sakic targets Riley Nash for the 4th line, he's typically reserved that line for high character penalty killers, not saying Nash isn't necessarily good, but with the options on the market I think it's unrealistic and antithetical to Sakic's reasoning the last few years. Hardly doubt that is Sakic is pulling teeth over giving Landy 5-8 years he's gonna be comfortable throwing 5 X 5 to Danault who projects as a slightly better Kadri, kinda worse Landeskog.

Love the idea of Forsberg and McCabe on this team, would be great additions and consolations for losing Landy. Love the idea of playing towards how GM's are acting — think you're a bit off in your assessments tbh.</div></div>

Side note, just saw you made the DNVR podcast! Congrats you're famous!

I also echo everything they say.
Forum: Armchair-GM26 juill. 2021 à 22 h 8
Sujet: Dumb Idiot DNVR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Meeqs</b></div><div>Edit: its tough to really know but considering their strong depth on defensive prospects and windows of the young players that strongly clash with the rest of the team I feel like there is certainly one of them that would make sense to use.

Other wise the team is even more foolish than I am assuming here.

Like lets say Fox/Lindgren who are both 23 are part of the core. That leaves 4 spots for Miller, Jones, Lunquist, and Schneider. That doesn't include Trouba who is signed for 5 more years and 3 of those kids wont be ready to play a significant role for 3 more seasons, while most of their core is in their mid to late prime.

I understand GM's like to play hardball but I just don't see the logic behind saying the guy thats 5th-7th on a depth chart is untouchable, especially when he just gave away a top liner for free and signed a bottom 6 guy to 4x too much</div></div>

They traded up for him in the draft, they signed him in March, and they just got rid of D'Angelo (which they've been planning on doing). He's kinda exactly what they need atm.
Forum: Armchair-GM26 juill. 2021 à 22 h 7
Sujet: Dumb Idiot DNVR
OOOF with a capital O, sure man, your whole dissertation that lets you sidestep being criticised on value aside, let's dig into this eh?

Alright, so we're operating based off of how GM's behave and how the NHL acts in reality, right? Lovely. Would love to know your thought process behind somehow convincing analytics darling Jake McCabe to sign a one year 2.5M deal. Is Sakic going to walk in and bully him over the year he lost to injury? While I'd love to join you in the stars wherever you pulled this term and dollar amount from, I am unfortunately bound to keep myself and my ideas down here on planet Earth, and would encourage you to do the same. Have you seen what Defensemen are getting these days? Suter's about to score 4 years and you think McCabe will pick up 1?? Let alone at 2.5? OOF

It's not about a value here, as much as it a fallacy, when it comes to this NY trade. Maybe Burnaby Joe puts on the silver tongue and pulls Schneider away. I think you're making the wrong read on NY, "Made bad move x therefor they'll make bad move Y" is some prettttttty faulty logic. Drury trading Buch saved him some cap space and got rid of an unsigned asset, maybe he does the same with Chytil, but it doesn't necessarily look like NY is selling off for selling off's sake as much as it looks they're trying to capitalize on assets they don't think they'll be able to sign (no matter how misguided). They just got rid of Deangelo on the back end, and they literally signed the kid back in March of this year. Maybe there's an argument to be made for Drury being willing to move him bc he wasn't GM then, but he was associate GM, it's not like he's a fresh face. I don't buy it. The Chytil addition, sure, but there's been rumors floating around that they've been wanting to extend a QO his way for a few weeks. Some faulty logic at best here, pretty sure they shoot this one down, Schneider's exactly what they need, they traded up for him and literally just signed him. Again, it's not the value so much that I have a hang up on, it's that it doesn't make much hockey sense. Feel free to elaborate on this one though.

This NSH trade, David Poile is going to trade his starting goaltender and top offensive producer to a division rival under the pretense that he's got a prospect *maybe 1-2* years away without a single bona fide blue chip prospect coming back? God bless the IRL GM who decides to go all in on a goalie prospect without seeing what they've got, we all know that works out so well (*cough* *cough* Markstrom *cough* *cough* Chris Gibson *cough* *cough* Malcolm Subban). NSH Knows how to develop goalies, call Poile the farmer because he knows a thing or two because he's seen a thing or two — he's also shown he doesn't put prospects into the fire unless he's certain they can handle it, and he doesn't make trades that'll put him in a conspicuous position without knowing he's got abundance to back him up. One good goalie prospect ain't abundance. This trade seems unrealistic, maybe a year or two from now, but right now, it doesn't cut it. Poile's not dealing one-on-one with a division rival like this unless he's certain he's coming out on top ESPECIALLY after the Girard trade (which again, was a move made out of abundance, as NSH had plenty of blue chip D at the time). I'm also fairly certain NSH has plenty of players like Martin Kaut, in fact — I'm pretty sure that's where Martin Kaut's spawn.

Don't know why Sakic targets Riley Nash for the 4th line, he's typically reserved that line for high character penalty killers, not saying Nash isn't necessarily good, but with the options on the market I think it's unrealistic and antithetical to Sakic's reasoning the last few years. Hardly doubt that Sakic is pulling teeth over giving Landy 5-8 years he's gonna be comfortable throwing 5 X 5 to Danault who projects as a slightly better Kadri, kinda worse Landeskog. BUT, FWIW, I do like Danault, I wouldn't mind him in that slot.

Love the idea of Forsberg and McCabe on this team, would be great additions and consolations for losing Landy. Love the idea of playing towards how GM's are acting — think you're a bit off in your assessments tbh.
Forum: Armchair-GM23 juill. 2021 à 18 h 54
Sujet: DNVR - If Landy walks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Meeqs</b></div><div>Again, I don't find anything I say to be negative and I feel it is plenty constructive. Concise maybe, but I don't personally attack anyone. I think you are projecting intent that isn't there.

99% of trades don't work, thats just the nature of the NHL. I don't find anything wrong with saying something doesn't work without having to offer an alternative.

If you don't care for my posts then just move on, don't have to talk to everyone you see in the bar ya know.</div></div>

Nah man Idk, your post here was a bit dickish and it seems like it's pretty par the course for everything else you put on people's threads.

There's going "that trade wouldn't work" and then going "well that's garbage I don't know why anybody would go for that."

But also, yeah you don't have to talk everybody in the bar, so who am I to say, eh?