SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Col and CBJ Swap Underperforming Centers DNVR

Équipe: 2021-22 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 23 juill. 2021
Publié: 23 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Putting some faith in the young ones. Col throws in two prospects in an area of need for Columbus to get CBJ to eat half of Domi's salary, hopefully recouping a 4th in the process. Jost signs for what he's worth (although, with Comph making 3.5 and Nuk making 2.5 I wouldn't be surprised if this number comes in a bit higher). With Graves, Kadri, and Donskoi gone the Avs can afford to throw the extra million at their captain because if they don't someone else will, and I figure if you can afford to keep the heart and soul of your team you oughta.

I raise eyebrows at hoping Newhook performs on the second line, would really love another middle six guy like Donskoi, but maybe Jost keeps taking steps forward, maybe Newhook blossoms. Concerned about PK depth and character in the bottom 6, could do with another Bellemare type as well. 800k leftover to play around for when the trade deadline rolls up.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
89 000 000 $
31 750 000 $
31 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
68 000 000 $
46 000 000 $
12 500 000 $
Transactions
COL
  1. Domi, Max (2 650 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de TOR
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2023
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2024
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $76 728 130 $1 741 463 $3 632 500 $4 771 870 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 8
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
-1 325 000 $-1 325 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
908 333 $908 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
809 167 $809 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
725 000 $725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 juill. 2021 à 17 h 20
#1
Dr.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,505
Mentions "j'aime": 1,438
The big issue i have with this one is that Domi wants to be a center. He Could play center this season for us but if newhook takes a step forward in his development odds are he will take that spot. So i think Domi leaves to go play center somewhere by free agency the season after. So we'd be throwing away the two prospects for an underperforming center. I'd rather go big and get an actual upgrade there
23 juill. 2021 à 17 h 25
#2
Démarrer sujet
we love the avs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 35
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: ArakinSkywalker
The big issue i have with this one is that Domi wants to be a center. He Could play center this season for us but if newhook takes a step forward in his development odds are he will take that spot. So i think Domi leaves to go play center somewhere by free agency the season after. So we'd be throwing away the two prospects for an underperforming center. I'd rather go big and get an actual upgrade there


See, I see where you're coming from on this, but honestly, I think that's okay. This is a "win now" roster, the Avs actual window is maybe 2 years including this season. Jean Luc probably wasn't going to take time from Kaut, Bowers, Ranta, and Beaucage has got some promise, but he's probably 1-3 years out anyway. If Domi recaptures his 70 point form, you're not resigning him with Burky, Bowers, and the hole on D coming off the books, and needing to sign Mack to big a contract the year after. Domi's replacement is on the roster in Newhook, it's much easier to go out and trade for another Burakovsky/Donskoi player to pair him with in the next season than it is to try and sign a minimum 5 million dollar center I say.
23 juill. 2021 à 18 h 52
#3
Remember David Koci
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 12
Mentions "j'aime": 3
The Kadri trade seems sensible, I guess the value's there, I think I'd like more but also I understand how context limits the value going back and forth.

Interesting to go in on the young guns, if this roster does the thing it looks really good, if it comes up short folks would probably wonder why more wasn't done.

However, running it back while keeping things in tact seemed to work out for Tampa, so who's to say?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage