PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
9
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Bruinsdiehard
Membre depuis
22 mai 2018
Équipe favorite
Bruins de Boston
Messages dans les forums
202
Messages par jour
0.1
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Expansion Draft
13 juill. 2021 à 16 h 17
Sujet:
Taking recent news into account (Part 3...Thanks MN Wild :/ )
Crap...should have been Ben Chiarot not Brett Kulak for Montreal. My mistake
Forum:
Expansion Draft
12 juill. 2021 à 18 h 1
Sujet:
Realistic?
V;adar is the goalie the Bruins will protect in the draft. And I would rather have Gaudette from the Blackhawks than Connolly
Forum:
Expansion Draft
11 juill. 2021 à 8 h 59
Sujet:
Taking recent news into account
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IconicHawk</b></div><div>Too bad Hagel won’t be a available</div></div>
You think they would protect him over Gaudette?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 sept. 2020 à 21 h 32
Sujet:
Calgary would you do this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KMMHL2012</b></div><div>I like how you're still defending your terrible trades, tooth and nail looking to prove your point.
nobody agrees, take the L and move on. LOL</div></div>
I like how you clearly must have checked to see why I didn’t respond to your useless 3 word post only to see an entire discussion on the thread. Did you get UPSET! because you weren’t included?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 sept. 2020 à 16 h 32
Sujet:
Calgary would you do this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>If you are going to make comments at least fact check them. Gaudreau would have been 5th in scoring on the Bruins this playoffs in 3 less games. Your top 6's scoring was almost equally as invisible.
Im not angry i just know you have no idea what you are talking about. Gaudreau had the worst season of his career and was still leagues better that Jake DeBust.</div></div>
Hahahahaha! Wow!!! 5th?! You don’t say? How impressive! 5th!!!! Wooo!
lol looking at your profile, you’re clearly one of the countless posters on this site who just seems to thrive on calling people trolls and shouting about all the things you think are so dumb. So good for you. I’m honestly glad you root for a train wreck of a team. You’re clearly so passionate and aggressive about it so it’s fun thinking about how much Calgary will continue to suck year after year. Maybe if you shout loud enough, Brad Treliving will hear you and hire you to be his next little assistant!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 sept. 2020 à 16 h 26
Sujet:
Calgary would you do this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Silkysmooth42</b></div><div>How many points did he have this year?
Please dont call someone else an idiot when you are not even close to right</div></div>
Lol oh my god he was injured dude. Injured. Lmao
Just go away
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 sept. 2020 à 16 h 17
Sujet:
Calgary would you do this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Lmao what?
1. Moore is far from cost controlled. He eould be paid almost 3 million to play in the minors. Flames have 4 maybe 5 better LD than him.
2. DeBrusk is 3 years younger than Gaudreau not 5. DeBrusk is a middle 6 player that might not even make Calgary's 2nd line.
3. Flames retain on Gaudreau?!?! God you are funny. Have you tried stand up?
The fact that you think this offer is even remotely close to fair shows how much of a homer you are.</div></div>
Just because Moore isn’t playing regularly for the Bruins doesn’t mean he’s not a good defender. Same type of situation with how Matt Irwin was in the AHL for the Bruins and then went on to start for Nashville when they went to the Finals. Or Nick Holden who couldn’t crack the Bruins lineup but has played 60+ games for Vegas in each of the last two years. But if you think John Moore is THAT terrible, then that’s your opinion.
As for Debrusk, my apologies, I read his DOB wrong. But that being said, at 24 he still has a little time left to shape his perception in the league........unlike Gaudreau who apparently has cemented his legacy as a soft, regular season player who disappears completely in the playoffs. So before you start crapping all over what Debrusk may or may not be, you might wanna look at what Gaudreau actually is.
I get that you’re angry Calgary has once again proven themselves to be the laughingstock of “competitive” teams, but you might wanna take a breath there buddy
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 sept. 2020 à 16 h 5
Sujet:
Calgary would you do this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>benjgc</b></div><div>They're absolutely gonna move at least one D this offseason, and possibly more. Priority is to add scoring talent up front. Not sure the Domi idea happens, but Jarmo knows a 2C is the goal. And I don't see Andy getting 6 or more from anybody, so a 4- or 5-year deal seems his most likely option.</div></div>
Ok, well I’m not gonna argue with all those moves you suggested (although the Wennberg buyout is truly outrageous...almost no team has ever bought out a guy with 3 years left on his contract since the last lockout) since that’s your purview as a Blue Jackets fan, but I will say the Anderson thing I feel is just flat out wrong. I agree that nobody would want to give him a long term contract given his injury history, so that’s exactly why a short term deal would be in everyone’s best interest. He can prove he has healed and that is 20+ goal season wasn’t a fluke, and then sign a longer term deal when he’s 27 or 28. The only way he takes a 4-5 deal is if he believes his value will never be higher, which would be a scary proposition given he is coming off shoulder surgery.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 sept. 2020 à 15 h 58
Sujet:
Calgary would you do this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>When did Gaudreau become a cap dump? Isn't it too early to be drinking? No chance Calgary considers this troll offer
Heres my counter
Dube, Lucic and a 5th for Bergeron and a 2nd</div></div>
Like I said in the caption for this roster, this assumes Calgary signs Taylor Hall and are looking to move on from Gaudreau (which has been widely reported anyways, but who knows). As for the trade, Calgary is getting value in a cost controlled LD in John Moore, and Jake Debrusk is 5 years younger than Gaudreau. The picks I guess could be changed around if Calgary was willing to retain a slight amount of Gaudreau’s contract, but that’s ultimately dressing on the deal. The heart of it is Debrusk and Moore for Gaudreau.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 sept. 2020 à 15 h 54
Sujet:
Calgary would you do this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>benjgc</b></div><div>Glad you asked! <a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/1908773">Here's my recent ACGM answering that.</a> Short version: trade Jenner, Murray and Harrington, and buy out Wennberg.</div></div>
I don’t see Columbus doing any of that in real life, but that’s why these boards are fun.
Also, I’d 100% change the term on your hypothetical for Anderson. Why would we want to become a UFA at 30 years old? He’s either going to sign a 1-2 year deal or a very long term deal (7-8 years)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 sept. 2020 à 15 h 45
Sujet:
Calgary would you do this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>benjgc</b></div><div>Columbus has no interest in adding yet another bottom-6 wing in Nick Ritchie, and given the reports from Dreger that Anderson is interested in re-signing long-term in Columbus, I could see a 5x4 deal being enough to keep him around at a reasonable hit. Pass.</div></div>
And they how does Columbus keep Pierre Luc Dubois if they sign Anderson to that?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 sept. 2020 à 20 h 43
Sujet:
Columbus would you do this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>He’s already turned down 7.5 for 5</div></div>
He who? And regardless, 7.5x5 is not as much money as 6.25x7 (or 8), so I don’t even understand your point?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 sept. 2020 à 20 h 14
Sujet:
Columbus would you do this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>benjgc</b></div><div>Great advice! We'll enjoy watching you do that. ;)</div></div>
Nahhh, we’ll play him! Against Columbus, watch him end Atkinson’s career with some sort of cheap shot, and he’ll be suspended for the rest of the year and won’t have to deal with him any more. Cheers!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 sept. 2020 à 20 h 11
Sujet:
Columbus would you do this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>benjgc</b></div><div>I'd be sad, personally. When he's healthy, he's an absolute beast, and a no-doubt top-6 forward. But as AJP said, Jarmo isn't moving 1st-rounders anytime soon, and Ritchie would just clog up our bottom 6 more than it already is. And DaBus is right: Hall for sure will not be that cheap, and Krug might be more expensive too.</div></div>
Lol my advice for you with Ritchie would be to bury him in the minors for a year and forget he exists. Then when his contract is up don’t qualify him. 😉
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 sept. 2020 à 20 h 8
Sujet:
Columbus would you do this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DaBus</b></div><div>Hall and Krug will get more money</div></div>
Depends what their mindset is. If they want more, they could probably find it. But I’d hope for their sake losing is something they enjoy because they won’t be winning anywhere that offers them significant more money than this
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 sept. 2020 à 20 h 5
Sujet:
Columbus would you do this
Unfortunately I don’t think a straight up swap of Debrusk for Anderson gets it done; skews too much towards Columbus
Would you be sad to see Anderson leave?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2018 à 8 h 14
Sujet:
Quebec vs. New England All Stars
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>beavereater</b></div><div>Sounds good but i think you miss Killorn</div></div>
Killorn was born in Nova Scotia
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2018 à 11 h 36
Sujet:
New England (plus CT) vs. Quebec All Stars
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dcc94</b></div><div>isnt Shattenkirk from New York??</div></div>
Nope, born in Connecticut
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 juin 2018 à 8 h 21
Sujet:
Boston with JT
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ON3M4N</b></div><div>There's a thing called trades lol. Boston could move out Krejci/Backes to make a deal work.</div></div>
Nah, his decision to bury Carlo in the minors for 800K in cap room is definitely the way the Bruins will go. They may even send McAvoy with him. Providence wins the Calder Cup. Boston, with Tavares, finishes lower in the standings than the Islanders lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 juin 2018 à 14 h 42
Sujet:
Tavares on the Bruins Roster
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PenGoater99</b></div><div>You'd have to retain 50% or pay the other team to take Backes</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jshherman</b></div><div>It's plausible, but I don't see Carolina taking on Backes (with no retained salary, as they already have a cap crunch esp. for a small market team) and giving you a third in the process.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Cakes2015</b></div><div>Yeah I would find it hard to believe that any GM would take that deal. Although I do think Backes still has some considerable value even though he wasn't amazing last season. I'm just spitballing.</div></div>
Move Cehlarik to the Backes deal, retain 1M of his salary and drop Carolina's pick to a 4th rounder, and there you have it. This is of course assuming Backes would ever move his NMC to go to Carolina which...why would he?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 juin 2018 à 8 h 37
Sujet:
New brew
The John Moore signing seems quite low, and given the interest he seems to be garnering during the tampering period, I have a hard time believing he'd want to come to Boston to be a 7th or 8th defenseman.
I also don't see the Sharks ever parting ways with Meier, and if they did, the Bruins wouldn't use him as a spare forward.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 juin 2018 à 8 h 33
Sujet:
Broons
These depth signings are beyond unnecessary. And of all the Bruins center prospects, Studnicka is the one I absolutely don't want them giving up.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 juin 2018 à 8 h 30
Sujet:
Tavmanian Devil
I don't see NYI ever doing that trade, nor do I see Krejci waiving his NMC to go there (or anywhere, but I sense I'm alone on that island among Bruins fans).
Instead of getting Klefbom, EDM can keep him or move him somewhere else (Carolina) to make room for Krug if they want. I'd rather have a draft pick and give a chance to either Lauzon or Zboril to develop into the next top 4 LHD for the organization.
And if you remove Klefbom, you don't need to do the Krejci trade and you'll have more cap space to potentially land a free agent like Grabner who could round out the top 6 and keep Pastrnak with Bergeron and Marchand.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 juin 2018 à 8 h 16
Sujet:
Tavares isn't Stamkos
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KnifeBoot28</b></div><div>I think trying to sign a player with a cap-hit like Nino's while also signing JT is a mistake.
</div></div>
He wasn't a signing, he was included in the trade from Minnesota. I included him in the trade because the value of doing this trade from Minnesota's perspective lies more in clearing money off the books for Zucker and Dumba instead of the assets they get back (although they are getting those too).
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KnifeBoot28</b></div><div>
I think the only way JT fits in the cap structure is to trade Krug, like you did, but also find a taker for Krejci's albatross. Moving Krejci would likely mean losing a high end prospect or younger high level roster player (Heinen, Donato, or DeBrusk) in the deal in exchange for Krejci's cap hit.
</div></div>
That's not really true. Bruins fans have been doing 2019-2020 roster builds for the last few days since the Tavares rumors picked up steam. And while the Bruins may need to buyout Krejci (or perhaps move him) in the 2019 offseason IF they sign Tavares, they certainly don't need to trade him AND Krug this year to make a JT signing work. Please see:
<a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/754305">https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/754305</a>
And
<a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/757055">https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/757055</a>
And
<a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/742167">https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/742167</a>
Moving Backes and Krejci in the 2019 offseason is a much simpler proposition since they will no longer be in possession of full NMCs. However...
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KnifeBoot28</b></div><div>Moving Backes may prove difficult without retaining substantial salary, in which case they may wait to for 19-20 for a buy out.</div></div>
They cannot buyout David Backes' contract. The cap hit for a buyout would be virtually identical to the cap hit for his contract, because almost all of the money he's paid comes in the form of a signing bonus. I suspect this was done intentionally to prevent the Bruins from being able to buyout Backes' contract, knowing that it was a very unlikely proposition that he would still be worth the money in year 4 or 5 of the contract (sadly, he wasn't worth the money starting in year 1).
Also, the trade scenario above has Boston retaining 1M and Carolina retaining 1M of Backes salary before he eventually ends up in Minnesota. I'm not sure how much more of his salary you want retained, but the CBA stipulates no more than 50% of a player's salary can be retained in a trade, and no more than 3 teams can retain a player's salary on their books. I think having 2M of Backes' 6M cap hit retained is more than fair for Minnesota to take him on.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 juin 2018 à 14 h 15
Sujet:
Tavares take 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Pasta88Sauce</b></div><div>thats why I said the grain of salt lol. Normally not right. Still think he would wave for the right team</div></div>
The wind is more reliable than he is.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com