SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

BOSSMAN

BOSSMAN
Membre depuis
6 juin 2019
Équipe favorite
Sabres de Buffalo
Messages dans les forums
123
Messages par jour
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GM15 mai 2021 à 20 h 40
Sujet: Eichel to the KINGS that makes sense
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TrueCanuck</b></div><div>Byfield has the potential to be a dominant centre that hits 100 points regularly. 40 goals wouldn't be out of the question and he's younger plus cheaper. Byfield dominated the world juniors as the youngest player there, and didn't look out of place one bit while playing AHL minutes as a teenager. That's rare. Why would LA trade that for Eichel? I never once said that Vilardi will be like Eichel. But Vilardi will be a great 2C with an effective 2way game while being able to put up 60-70 points. He fits that role better. Eichel wouldn't be the 2C. Turcotte tore up the AHL. Didn't look out of place either. I'm not saying that he wouldn't be traded, I'm saying that for Eichel it's pointless when they'll have Byfield at 1C, Vilardi at 2C, and Kopitar at 3C.. where does Eichel fit in that? Wouldn't be the 1C once Byfield gets going and hits his prime, Eichel's too good for a 2C and Vilardi is already on the team and fits that role perfectly, and Eichel would be a terrible 3C. That's why LA doesn't do it (in case you couldn't read my last comment), they don't do it because they don't need a centre. At all. Why would LA give up valuable assets for something they don't need when they can use it for something they do need?</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TrueCanuck</b></div><div>Byfield has the potential to be a dominant centre that hits 100 points regularly. 40 goals wouldn't be out of the question and he's younger plus cheaper. Byfield dominated the world juniors as the youngest player there, and didn't look out of place one bit while playing AHL minutes as a teenager. That's rare. Why would LA trade that for Eichel? I never once said that Vilardi will be like Eichel. But Vilardi will be a great 2C with an effective 2way game while being able to put up 60-70 points. He fits that role better. Eichel wouldn't be the 2C. Turcotte tore up the AHL. Didn't look out of place either. I'm not saying that he wouldn't be traded, I'm saying that for Eichel it's pointless when they'll have Byfield at 1C, Vilardi at 2C, and Kopitar at 3C.. where does Eichel fit in that? Wouldn't be the 1C once Byfield gets going and hits his prime, Eichel's too good for a 2C and Vilardi is already on the team and fits that role perfectly, and Eichel would be a terrible 3C. That's why LA doesn't do it (in case you couldn't read my last comment), they don't do it because they don't need a centre. At all. Why would LA give up valuable assets for something they don't need when they can use it for something they do need?</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TrueCanuck</b></div><div>Byfield has the potential to be a dominant centre that hits 100 points regularly. 40 goals wouldn't be out of the question and he's younger plus cheaper. Byfield dominated the world juniors as the youngest player there, and didn't look out of place one bit while playing AHL minutes as a teenager. That's rare. Why would LA trade that for Eichel? I never once said that Vilardi will be like Eichel. But Vilardi will be a great 2C with an effective 2way game while being able to put up 60-70 points. He fits that role better. Eichel wouldn't be the 2C. Turcotte tore up the AHL. Didn't look out of place either. I'm not saying that he wouldn't be traded, I'm saying that for Eichel it's pointless when they'll have Byfield at 1C, Vilardi at 2C, and Kopitar at 3C.. where does Eichel fit in that? Wouldn't be the 1C once Byfield gets going and hits his prime, Eichel's too good for a 2C and Vilardi is already on the team and fits that role perfectly, and Eichel would be a terrible 3C. That's why LA doesn't do it (in case you couldn't read my last comment), they don't do it because they don't need a centre. At all. Why would LA give up valuable assets for something they don't need when they can use it for something they do need?</div></div>

Byfield 100 points ? for Do you even watch hockey? Lmao, Lafreniere is so much better than him and he had 20 points this year, your lucky if Byfield gets 70 points in his 5th year
Forum: Armchair-GM15 mai 2021 à 18 h 30
Sujet: Eichel to the KINGS that makes sense
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TrueCanuck</b></div><div>None of this makes any sense for LA. Eichel doesn't make sense for LA. The Kings already have centre prospects in the system that can be top 6 or even game changing talents. Byfield, Turcotte, and Vilardi would be off the table for LA to move for Eichel. A top centre isn't their need. They have the forwards to fit their rebuild, they'd only move their high end guys for a top poring left defenceman. It makes no sense at all to be going after Eichel and makes less sense for them to use Byfield, Turcotte, or Vilardi for it. I could see them using Turcotte for a high end defenceman that's already proven. But other than that, they'll stand pat</div></div>


None of those player will ever come close to what Eichel is, Jack was on pace for 40 goals and 95 points at 23 years old before covid hit, your telling me one of those 3 players will be able to do that? give me a break buddy. Vilardi is 22 years old and had 20 points this year and Eichel played hurt all year and still almost managed to put up more points than vilardi in less than half the games. what has Turcotte and byfield done at the NHL level to make you think they're so special or have a chance to become better that Eichel?
Forum: Armchair-GM28 avr. 2021 à 17 h 17
Sujet: TRADING FOR JACK EICHEL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tkecanuck341</b></div><div>I'd argue that Vilardi has more value than Turcotte right now.



LA isn't going to trade Byfield for Eichel. Additionally, any Eichel trade would likely happen after the draft meaning both picks would be in 2022 at the earliest.

LA has 4 untouchable players right now, even for Eichel. Byfield, Bjornfot, Anderson, and Petersen aren't going anywhere. If Buffalo decides that there's not enough remaining to put together a package for Eichel, then LA won't get Eichel.</div></div>

Id agree with you, Vilardi has more value right now than Turcotte. Buffalo is looking for a Roster player (Vilardi) a top prospect (bjornfot) mid level to high (Arthur) and a 1st and 2nd . The kings can definitely part ways with that when you have Kale and Anderson already on the left side
Forum: Armchair-GM28 avr. 2021 à 15 h 59
Forum: Armchair-GM24 juin 2019 à 9 h 43
Forum: Armchair-GM20 juin 2019 à 16 h 46