SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Because the AVS can't get everyone at camp....

Créé par: jeg5393
Équipe: 2017-18 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 12 sept. 2017
Publié: 12 sept. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Tricked ya, its not another Duchene trade.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
Zaripov, Danis
12 000 000 $
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2019
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2375 000 000 $68 625 000 $50 000 $1 032 500 $6 375 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Zaripov, Danis
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
640 000 $640 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
734 167 $734 167 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 4
6 800 000 $6 800 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
625 000 $625 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
612 500 $612 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
675 000 $675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
625 000 $625 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
650 000 $650 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 sept. 2017 à 10 h 10
#1
Habs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 518
Mentions "j'aime": 72
I clicked back 3 times confused as **** until I read the description. Well played
jeg5393 a aimé ceci.
12 sept. 2017 à 10 h 23
#2
Jetsfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 8,015
Mentions "j'aime": 2,598
Why would EDM do that??? Bad trade as Maatta has been inj for most of his career and Nurse is better. EDM also doesn't need prospects (Sprong). If EDM is going to trade RNH, its going to be for a better winger.
12 sept. 2017 à 11 h 5
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 444
Mentions "j'aime": 38
Quoting: dcc94
Why would EDM do that??? Bad trade as Maatta has been inj for most of his career and Nurse is better. EDM also doesn't need prospects (Sprong). If EDM is going to trade RNH, its going to be for a better winger.


My justification:
Hornqvist is in his last year but is still a to 6 winger. Swaping him for RNH opens cap after this year for when the Mc David contract hit goes into effect.
I agree Nurse is marginally better than Maata BUT maata is already signed for a few more years at a reasonable contract for a mid pairing D man. Nurse is about to demand a raise to Maata money or more, I assume 4.5-5mil per season.
Sprong was included to offset the money retained on RNH and the skill differential between Maata and Nurse. I'm not trying to be a big PIT fan boy but Sprong will probably be a top 6 winger with sid for the 18-19 season. He also has great foot speed and an accurate shot (similar to Kessel but not quite as dynamic) that would pair well with McDavid.
Trade helps both teams
12 sept. 2017 à 11 h 35
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 302
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Quoting: dcc94
Why would EDM do that??? Bad trade as Maatta has been inj for most of his career and Nurse is better. EDM also doesn't need prospects (Sprong). If EDM is going to trade RNH, its going to be for a better winger.


I think you have it back-wards, why would the Pens do this trade. Nurse might be cheaper, but Maatta has been way better, even with the injuries (which has only really impacted 1 season). Both are really young, but Maatta is established and signed for 5 more seasons at a reasonable rate.

Sprong is a top 25 prospect in the NHL at just 20 years old and he is ready to play at that level this year (though the Pens might wait till mid-year given their winger depth). Guy has the potential to be a 30 goal scorer and a 50-60 point player and in the right situation could do that this year. He's on his ELC and will obviously be pretty cheap for at least his first couple of years. Hornqvist is still a top 6 winger with 25 goal potential.

In return the Pens would get RNH (at a reduced rate) for 4 years. Nugent-Hopkins is good and the price being lower helps, but he's a 50 point player esp. if he's stuck in the 3C role (as he obviously will be with the Pens) and not a top PP guy. Nurse is young and has upside, but thus far hasn't shown himself to be an established NHL'er. His offensive game is non-existent, his possession numbers are below average, even in Maatta's worst year of his career this past year he basically played as well as Nurse has ever shown.

I could see like Hornqvist and a 1st for RNH, maybe another high pick as well, but it makes zero sense for the Pens to give up all of this for RNH
12 sept. 2017 à 13 h 50
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,711
Mentions "j'aime": 4,628
Well played Sir! Well played! applaud
jeg5393 a aimé ceci.
13 sept. 2017 à 19 h 54
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,711
Mentions "j'aime": 4,628
I forgot to rate you and 5 stars for the entrapment! laugh
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage