SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Montreal/Chicago fans, how do we feel about this?

Créé par: DontToewsMe19
Équipe: 2017-18 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 25 août 2017
Publié: 25 août 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
Transactions
MTL
  1. Anisimov, Artem
  2. Pokka, Ville
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (CHI)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2019
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2375 000 000 $60 664 795 $3 558 000 $1 357 500 $14 335 205 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
800 000 $800 000 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, C
NTC
UFA - 1
912 500 $912 500 $
C
UFA - 1
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 6
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AD, C
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
745 000 $745 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
872 500 $872 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
5 275 000 $5 275 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 août 2017 à 12 h 4
#1
ARMCHAIRGM2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Modifié 25 août 2017 à 12 h 16
Well as a Habs fan I say yes but I doubt a Blackhawks fan would say the same. Blackhawks are overpaying big time on this lol.

Edit nevermind : I'm stoopid
25 août 2017 à 12 h 11
#2
Démarrer sujet
DontToewsMe19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,178
Mentions "j'aime": 173
Quoting: CritikedARMCHAIRGM
Well as a Habs fan I say yes but I doubt a Blackhawks fan would say the same. Blackhawks are overpaying big time on this lol.


I am a Hawks fan. I don't think we are overpaying. AA makes a lot of money (not that Danault won't be making that money quickly), and we need the cap space right now. If we can give Danault an extension of 4 years between 3.5 and 3.8, I'd say that's good value and we save a little bit of cap in the process. The 2nd is meh, and could be changed for a 3rd. Pokka is kind of a bust and isn't gonna play in Chicago.
25 août 2017 à 12 h 15
#3
ARMCHAIRGM2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: DontToewsMe19


I am a Hawks fan. I don't think we are overpaying. AA makes a lot of money (not that Danault won't be making that money quickly), and we need the cap space right now. If we can give Danault an extension of 4 years between 3.5 and 3.8, I'd say that's good value and we save a little bit of cap in the process. The 2nd is meh, and could be changed for a 3rd. Pokka is kind of a bust and isn't gonna play in Chicago.



Well yeah I was doing some research, and Pokka is a bust. I don't know, in my head he was a good prospect and played nhl games but he apparently didn't.
Pokka got over my head as a huge piece so it made me think the trade was in Montréal favor, but you're right.
25 août 2017 à 12 h 25
#4
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Honestly you don't need to include Pokka, great trade.
25 août 2017 à 12 h 26
#5
Démarrer sujet
DontToewsMe19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,178
Mentions "j'aime": 173
Quoting: CritikedARMCHAIRGM
Quoting: DontToewsMe19


I am a Hawks fan. I don't think we are overpaying. AA makes a lot of money (not that Danault won't be making that money quickly), and we need the cap space right now. If we can give Danault an extension of 4 years between 3.5 and 3.8, I'd say that's good value and we save a little bit of cap in the process. The 2nd is meh, and could be changed for a 3rd. Pokka is kind of a bust and isn't gonna play in Chicago.



Well yeah I was doing some research, and Pokka is a bust. I don't know, in my head he was a good prospect and played nhl games but he apparently didn't.
Pokka got over my head as a huge piece so it made me think the trade was in Montréal favor, but you're right.


I used to believe he was our best prospect. I used to be stupid. ???

Quoting: EthanK24
Honestly you don't need to include Pokka, great trade.


Thanks dude! But don't you want our all-star prospect?
25 août 2017 à 12 h 34
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,635
Mentions "j'aime": 6,768
Nice trade but CHI is overpaying.

In other news the GM game might need more GM's soon. Anyone looking to join come post in the Asst GM Thread in the GM game section.

https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/56531
25 août 2017 à 13 h 11
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 841
Mentions "j'aime": 211
This would be a good trade for each team but it's too bad Danault was in the dog house under Q. Unfortunately I don't see him returning.
25 août 2017 à 13 h 14
#8
Démarrer sujet
DontToewsMe19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,178
Mentions "j'aime": 173
Quoting: bluedemon5
This would be a good trade for each team but it's too bad Danault was in the dog house under Q. Unfortunately I don't see him returning.


Meh. He could get another shot. And we could get a really good return from someone like Pittsburgh for him if need be.
25 août 2017 à 17 h 10
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 4
Mentions "j'aime": 1
I'd have worked it so Lindgren came over with Danault.
DontToewsMe19 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage