SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Post draft

Créé par: ryankelly
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 29 juin 2024
Publié: 29 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3975 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
87 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 500 000 $
67 000 000 $
Transactions
BOS
  1. McGroarty, Rutger [Liste de réserve]
  2. Schmidt, Nate
WPG
  1. Frederic, Trent
  2. Merkulov, Georgi
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2027
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2388 000 000 $81 788 334 $50 000 $330 000 $6 211 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
800 000 $800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
sam. à 19 h 45
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,252
Mentions "j'aime": 9,048
No way in hell Boston does that. Neither does Winnipeg
Bruins1054_gmb a aimé ceci.
sam. à 19 h 55
#2
DiscouragedBruinsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,303
Mentions "j'aime": 516
I think the bruins should be in on McGroaty. I doubt they're willing to move Fred tho
sam. à 19 h 57
#3
DiscouragedBruinsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,303
Mentions "j'aime": 516
Quoting: Gofnut999
No way in hell Boston does that. Neither does Winnipeg


Wouldn't be shocked with Sweeney.
If I saw an ACGM that had Korpisalo, Kastelic, and the late first for Ullmark, I would have roasted the op.
sam. à 20 h 14
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 16
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
I think the bruins should be in on McGroaty. I doubt they're willing to move Fred tho


Agreed but I wish they would especially if they could make it work with Rutger. Just have no interest in a Freddy extension that probably runs at least $4mil per
sam. à 21 h 1
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,252
Mentions "j'aime": 9,048
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
Wouldn't be shocked with Sweeney.
If I saw an ACGM that had Korpisalo, Kastelic, and the late first for Ullmark, I would have roasted the op.


They were forced to take 3m in 💩 cap due to no leverage. They are not taking almost 6m in 💩 cap when it is not necessary and they can’t afford to.
sam. à 21 h 4
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 17,792
Mentions "j'aime": 7,775
Nothing there of interest for Winnipeg.
sam. à 21 h 33
#7
DiscouragedBruinsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,303
Mentions "j'aime": 516
Quoting: Gofnut999
They were forced to take 3m in 💩 cap due to no leverage. They are not taking almost 6m in 💩 cap when it is not necessary and they can’t afford to.


They weren't forced. I'd be happier spending $13M on goaltending with Ullmark and Sway than $11M with Sway and Korpisalo
sam. à 22 h 10
#8
DiscouragedBruinsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,303
Mentions "j'aime": 516
Quoting: ryankelly
Agreed but I wish they would especially if they could make it work with Rutger. Just have no interest in a Freddy extension that probably runs at least $4mil per


I mean, if he steps up this year, scores 20+, plays some top 6 mins, tops 40+ points, I think he'll be worth $4M/ year.

I think he also needs to maintain a physical snarl to his game that helps give the Bruins their tough- guy identity back.
sam. à 22 h 56
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,252
Mentions "j'aime": 9,048
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
They weren't forced. I'd be happier spending $13M on goaltending with Ullmark and Sway than $11M with Sway and Korpisalo


Yes they were. They did not want him. They could have walked away. Would have been kind of stupid to though. There was not going to be another chance. They wanted him out by July 1st, they wanted a 1st. They had to make a sacrifice to do it with no other options.
sam. à 23 h 25
#10
DiscouragedBruinsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,303
Mentions "j'aime": 516
Quoting: Gofnut999
Yes they were. They did not want him. They could have walked away. Would have been kind of stupid to though. There was not going to be another chance. They wanted him out by July 1st, they wanted a 1st. They had to make a sacrifice to do it with no other options.


Right, but they weren't forced to make a bad trade which is what they made. Ullmark would have happily played his last year here, knowing they wanted to trade him. They wanted him out, they wanted to trade him even for a lesser return.

What they got is fine, other they Korpisalo. That contract will hinder their financial flexibility for four more seasons, opposed to just one.
dim. à 9 h 6
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,252
Mentions "j'aime": 9,048
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
Right, but they weren't forced to make a bad trade which is what they made. Ullmark would have happily played his last year here, knowing they wanted to trade him. They wanted him out, they wanted to trade him even for a lesser return.

What they got is fine, other they Korpisalo. That contract will hinder their financial flexibility for four more seasons, opposed to just one.


As I said above, keeping him for another year was not an option. Nor should it have been. They wanted him gone by July 1st.

They were forced to take Korpi to do that and get the 1st that they coveted.

Nobody is happy about it, but it was the right move.

Letting walk for nothing would have been far worse. Which is what happens if he starts the season with them.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage