SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Players worth FC

Créé par: RecycleShark
Équipe: 2024-25 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 17 juin 2024
Publié: 17 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
There are a number of players who are right on the border of being negative value capdumps vs positive value trade targets. Generally good players with bad contracts on cap-strapped teams. Or players who have fallen out of favor with their team's fans., or whose future value is uncertain due to injury, etc. So call it even and make them free.

All of the scenarios below assume no retention. Retention would make them positive value.

Go ahead and make your case for why each of these actually has a positive or negative value.
Transactions
1.
2.
EDM
    FC
    3.
    4.
    SJS
    1. Burns, Brent
    2. Orlov, Dmitry
    Détails additionnels:
    Either Burns or Orlov. Not both.
    CAR
      FC
      5.
      6.
      Rachats de contrats
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2024
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de TBL
      Logo de VGK
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de SJS
      2025
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de VGK
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de WPG
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de NJD
      2026
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2288 000 000 $104 559 167 $0 $4 550 000 $-16 559 167 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
      AD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      AG
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      941 667 $941 667 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
      AD, C
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      800 000 $800 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 200 000 $$3M)
      C
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
      C, AD, AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
      C
      UFA - 6
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Panthers de la Floride
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      G
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Panthers de la Floride
      7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 2
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      17 juin à 1 h 50
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2021
      Messages: 5,076
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,661
      Both those canes have positive value
      fullblowncaniac90 a aimé ceci.
      17 juin à 2 h 14
      #2
      Hockey
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2024
      Messages: 25
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Columbus would want something for laine, his contract is terrible but with 50% retention they could get a 1st from a contending team, burns is worth at least a 3rd from a contending team, panthers wouldn’t trade ekblad and Definetly not for free, knight gonna cost smth bc he’s young and they can sign him to a better contract when they’re ready to contend

      Cody ceci is negative Edmonton should throw in a 4th and mid prospect, Jacob Trouba is extremely negative maybe with a 1st and decent prospect, Josh Norris is also a negative but Ottawa doesn’t need to get rid of him rn so they won’t pay


      Orlov is fair but probably gonna cost Carolina a little
      RecycleShark a aimé ceci.
      17 juin à 4 h 5
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2023
      Messages: 4,803
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,359
      Quoting: Canesfan21_
      Both those canes have positive value


      Depends on the context... if we're just looking to shed salary
      17 juin à 4 h 9
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2024
      Messages: 193
      Mentions "j'aime": 92
      With the cap finally going up substantially, I doubt this year will involve the likes of Fredrik Olofsson, Kailer Yamamoto and Josh Bailey be given way with prospects or picks to make cap room. I would even argue that Oilers didn't want to bail on Yamamoto, but it was other unmovable contracts that forced their hand to do so.

      I think everyone you listed still has trade value. There are risks to players like Laine and Norris, but I personally think both will get back to career norms if not next year, the year after and an acquiring GM will take those risks.

      There is probably going to be some GM that still over spends, making another player on their roster expendable to the future consideration trade. But those trades are usually other GMs recognizing the mistakes that team did and taking advantage of it.

      And I never understand the hate for Ceci. It's usually who he is deployed with (Nurse, Phaneuf) who are the under achieving, over priced ones, or he's playing higher in the line-up than he should. He's on a reasonable contract and currently playing for the Stanley Cup. The dude is probably going to finish his career with over 1000 games. Not everyone can be superstars.
      MisstheWhalers et RecycleShark a aimé ceci.
      17 juin à 11 h 10
      #5
      Stovetop
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2017
      Messages: 2,483
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,125
      Everyone on this list has varying degree's of positive value, other than Ceci.

      They'd all certainly be at a discounted price, but I very much doubt would be FC
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage