SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Polling the value

Créé par: Beargold
Publié: 6 juin à 17 h 33
Plafond salarial: 87 700 000 $
Journées à la saison: 185/186 (99%)
Détermination du registraire central: Cette transaction a été refusée, car une des équipes n'a pas atteint le plancher salarial

Logo de Sénateurs d'OttawaSénateurs d'Ottawa

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (Logo de Sénateurs d'OttawaOTT)---010------
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Garland, ConorCanucks de VancouverLNH-4 923 387 $011---0000--
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial12 165 953 $1629474512
Variation-4 923 387 $1110-10
Final7 242 566 $ (↓)17 (↑)30 (↑)48 (↑)44 (↓)12000

Logo de Canucks de VancouverCanucks de Vancouver

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Garland, ConorCanucks de VancouverLNH-4 923 387 $011---0000--
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (Logo de Sénateurs d'OttawaOTT)---010------
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial23 778 333 $1533482311
Variation4 923 387 $-1-1-1010
Final28 701 720 $ (↑)14 (↓)32 (↓)47 (↓)24 (↑)11000
6 juin à 17 h 44
#1
guest123
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 22
Mentions "j'aime": 2
if nucks were to do this, hopefully they can use the pick to offload mikeyahv to another team
6 juin à 17 h 51
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 11,661
Mentions "j'aime": 10,425
Canucks pass
6 juin à 17 h 54
#3
Démarrer sujet
Beargold
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 528
Mentions "j'aime": 238
Quoting: mv21227
Canucks pass


As they should! Garland is a great player who really fits Tocchet's system. But with reports that VAN wants more top-6 help, squeezing out some of the more expensive middle-6 players may be an unfortunate reality. Garland might just get pushed out, and OTTs 2nd would be a decent price for him.

What if OTT threw in Bernard-Docker as well?
6 juin à 17 h 58
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 11,661
Mentions "j'aime": 10,425
Quoting: Beargold
As they should! Garland is a great player who really fits Tocchet's system. But with reports that VAN wants more top-6 help, squeezing out some of the more expensive middle-6 players may be an unfortunate reality. Garland might just get pushed out, and OTTs 2nd would be a decent price for him.

What if OTT threw in Bernard-Docker as well?


I don’t think JBD makes enough of a difference. The value is fair but Garland has more value to the Canucks than he would in a trade. He was one of our best and most consistent forwards all season. Personally I’d pay to move Mikheyev before moving Garland
6 juin à 18 h 10
#5
Démarrer sujet
Beargold
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 528
Mentions "j'aime": 238
Quoting: mv21227
I don’t think JBD makes enough of a difference. The value is fair but Garland has more value to the Canucks than he would in a trade. He was one of our best and most consistent forwards all season. Personally I’d pay to move Mikheyev before moving Garland


I think VAN will have to pay to move Mikheyev regardless, tbh. Mik was terrible during the playoffs and just couldn't get anything going despite having some pretty good chances. That's always been his problem, even back in his TOR days.

JBD would be a good add for VAN I think. Pushes Juulsen further down the depth charts, which is only a positive, and gives them some long-term 3D options. But I agree that JBD and a 2nd, while good value for a middle-6 player, just doesn't come close to convincing VAN to move Garland.
mv21227 a aimé ceci.
6 juin à 18 h 17
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 45
Mentions "j'aime": 10
I may be the only one that thinks this but I think that both teams say no. Ottawa would be right up against the cap and I think that they need to make a bigger move than a Garland trade to compete (which is what they want). I also think Vancouver would be a little nuts trading away a winger when thats their biggest need, especially with a number of their players likely hitting free agency.
mv21227 a aimé ceci.
7 juin à 11 h 27
#7
guest123
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 22
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: jwills2001
I may be the only one that thinks this but I think that both teams say no. Ottawa would be right up against the cap and I think that they need to make a bigger move than a Garland trade to compete (which is what they want). I also think Vancouver would be a little nuts trading away a winger when thats their biggest need, especially with a number of their players likely hitting free agency.


right but for the $5 mil that garland makes he just isint giving us enough points, id rather use that money on toffoli or debrusk
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage