SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

IDK thinking out loud

Créé par: depthsgaming2024
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 5 juin 2024
Publié: 6 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I will be very open and say I looked into none of the players statistics, age, previous season points, or anything else that was not provided on this page as I created this. That being said I will try and explain what I can here.

Ully and Peeke trade: As much as I want to see Peeke and Ully as Bruins, we need center help. We do not need 2 #1 goalies, Anaheim needs a goalie and a good defenseman. They have no trouble scoring goals, they need to prevent them, we need a center that has a 1C potential this season, Coyle kind of has it but Zegras may have the speed needed.

The other 2 trades, we NEED picks. I chose San Jose and Seattle for decent picks and getting rid of some roster space that we can fill elsewhere IF needed. I did not put much thought into these trades, just kind of a last minute thing so I can wrap this up.

The signings are so we actually have a AHL roster, and we have 2 prospects that need to be signed in I believe July and August this year, I assume the Bruins give the chance so I gave them league minimums (again, I know nothing about them, may be worth more) Other resigning's I either kept them the same or slightly upped them based off of little things I hear on podcasts and stuff, just what I could remember.

I think Anaheim considers the deal. IF Bruins wanted to adjust it I could easily see that, I am somewhat new to contracts and trades, only really watched hockey until recently I have gotten more into this side of things. the other trades, doubtful, probably don't even make the attempt, but I would love to see more picks in early rounds for us.

I think this gives us a solid team during a rebuild year, and keeps us somewhat competitive. I also brought DiPietro up instead of Bussi because of how this season went, Bussi killed it in camp and the beginning of the season but my understanding is DiPietro got the starting position for the last half.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
4775 000 $
3775 000 $
3775 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
67 000 000 $
31 250 000 $
3950 000 $
2850 000 $
3775 000 $
3775 000 $
4900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
44 500 000 $
45 500 000 $
24 000 000 $
3800 000 $
3775 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
SJS
  1. Brown, Patrick
  2. Nelson, Jaxon
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
3.
BOS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (SEA)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYR
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de SEA
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2087 700 000 $86 153 334 $50 000 $330 000 $1 546 666 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 juin à 4 h 28
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 2,978
Mentions "j'aime": 2,426
Ducks have Dostal I doubt they're interested in Ullmark~
OldNYIfan et GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
6 juin à 4 h 31
#2
Démarrer sujet
Depth24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 11
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Not sure how to delete comments so there's this...
6 juin à 4 h 35
#3
Démarrer sujet
Depth24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 11
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: StutzlesNumber1Fan
Ducks have Dostal I doubt they're interested in Ullmark~


Shoot, I totally forgot about him. He could use the guidance of a veteran with a vezina who is in his prime. Watching someone like that instead of Gibson could have some upside. Even if it is just for the one year left on Ullmark's contract.
6 juin à 4 h 37
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 2,978
Mentions "j'aime": 2,426
Quoting: depthsgaming2024
Shoot, I totally forgot about him. He could use the guidance of a veteran with a vezina who is in his prime. Watching someone like that instead of Gibson could have some upside. Even if it is just for the one year left on Ullmark's contract.


Ayy man Ullmark is a complete stud so you never know. I'm sure a third of the league is going to make an offer on him at least lol
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
6 juin à 4 h 40
#5
Ducks and Kings Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 42,137
Mentions "j'aime": 26,697
Welcome to CapFriendly! cheers Sometimes, it's not too friendly.

Los Angeles is the SoCal team that needs a goalie, not Anaheim, as my friend @StutzlesNumber1Fan has said.
6 juin à 4 h 45
#6
Démarrer sujet
Depth24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 11
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Welcome to CapFriendly! cheers Sometimes, it's not too friendly.

Los Angeles is the SoCal team that needs a goalie, not Anaheim, as my friend StutzlesNumber1Fan has said.


I'm fairly certain there was a rumor this year of a trade to LA that Ullmark denied, otherwise LA has some pieces we could use as well.
6 juin à 6 h 20
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 2,978
Mentions "j'aime": 2,426
Quoting: depthsgaming2024
I'm fairly certain there was a rumor this year of a trade to LA that Ullmark denied, otherwise LA has some pieces we could use as well.


Positive you're correct. I believe Boston was going to get PLD for Ullmark but Ullmark veto'd it~
GeneralLandro et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
6 juin à 6 h 20
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,376
Mentions "j'aime": 13,313
Quoting: depthsgaming2024
I'm fairly certain there was a rumor this year of a trade to LA that Ullmark denied, otherwise LA has some pieces we could use as well.


I think he did say no to LA and in the same thing said he wanted to stay on the East Coast for shorter flight times back home
StutzlesNumber1Fan et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
6 juin à 6 h 44
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 669
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: StutzlesNumber1Fan
Positive you're correct. I believe Boston was going to get PLD for Ullmark but Ullmark veto'd it~


Thank Christ Ullmark nixed it
StutzlesNumber1Fan a aimé ceci.
6 juin à 8 h 11
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,807
Mentions "j'aime": 1,025
How do you give a post this much thought and come up with this sharks obviously decline
Sjbackseatgm et karlsson65 a aimé ceci.
6 juin à 9 h 30
#11
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 22,924
Mentions "j'aime": 7,466
bad targets, bad offers, and a non cap complaint team.
karlsson65 a aimé ceci.
6 juin à 10 h 34
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 837
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Remove all the picks in Sharks proposal and it’s a lot closer
6 juin à 11 h 37
#13
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 11,118
Mentions "j'aime": 7,892
Quoting: depthsgaming2024
Shoot, I totally forgot about him. He could use the guidance of a veteran with a vezina who is in his prime. Watching someone like that instead of Gibson could have some upside. Even if it is just for the one year left on Ullmark's contract.


And a year of a goalie we don't have room for and a 3rd pairing D worth a late round pick is worth Trevor Zegras in your opinion?
6 juin à 13 h 29
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 78
Mentions "j'aime": 33
why do people rationalize they're proposals by saying oh I didn't look into stats/no time to think on it. Like dude you decided to post it. At least stand by it instead of using lame excuses. Are you basically saying you are stupid.

patrick brown is garbage 32 year old 4th liner with 25 points in 150 games. he was so garbage he only played 11 games for the bruins last year.
jaxon nelson is a nothing special prospect. how the **** are those 2 going to get you the 14th and 33rd picks. adding a 3rd is barely adding any value.

Like dude use some common sense. I could show this proposal to 100 new hockey fans and at least 99% would not be stupid enough to think that proposal is fair in anyway. the 1% will be the guy with brain damage. is that guy you
GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
6 juin à 13 h 30
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 78
Mentions "j'aime": 33
Quoting: Letsgosharks
How do you give a post this much thought and come up with this sharks obviously decline


complete delusion. hilarious is how the early posters are oh welcome to cap friendly its not so nice. Like if you propose trash you will get called out on it.
Letsgosharks a aimé ceci.
6 juin à 13 h 38
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 78
Mentions "j'aime": 33
Quoting: depthsgaming2024
Shoot, I totally forgot about him. He could use the guidance of a veteran with a vezina who is in his prime. Watching someone like that instead of Gibson could have some upside. Even if it is just for the one year left on Ullmark's contract.


why would the ducks do this. do you ever think of another teams side. the ducks already have gibson. why would they waste assets on a guy who only has 1 year left. especially if the ask is zegras.

ullmark is good but there is no way he is getting a zegras type player even if you add a garbage d-man like peeke. ullmark has 1 year left on his deal. he will get a late 1st for sure but no where near what some of you bruins fans are thinking. yes zegras had a bad year but he is still 23. there is no way the ducks would trade him for a garbage d-man and a goalie that will walk in 1 year especially when they already have gibson and dostal.

Only rational for this trade is your delusion that thinks it will happen. half fun getting a late 1st for ullmark because thats all hes getting. he was so good that the bruins would not even want him to start for them in the playoffs. lol
GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
6 juin à 15 h 24
#17
Démarrer sujet
Depth24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 11
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: Letsgosharks
How do you give a post this much thought and come up with this sharks obviously decline


As mentioned in the description, I have no idea of the trades other than the anaheim one which i put a bit of thought into. Peeke performed really well and Gibson isn't amazing so they could get rid of him. This was just a thinking out loud anyways. try and get picks with something for Ullmark. Zegras and Anaheim aren't working out from what I understand
6 juin à 15 h 26
#18
Démarrer sujet
Depth24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 11
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
And a year of a goalie we don't have room for and a 3rd pairing D worth a late round pick is worth Trevor Zegras in your opinion?


Only thinking because Gibson isn't that great, and Ullmark could add for them. Peeke played well for the Bruins. also, Zegras and Anaheim aren't working out from my understanding. Again, just thinking out loud like the name said. I want picks and a good center.
6 juin à 15 h 28
#19
Démarrer sujet
Depth24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 11
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: karlsson65
why do people rationalize they're proposals by saying oh I didn't look into stats/no time to think on it. Like dude you decided to post it. At least stand by it instead of using lame excuses. Are you basically saying you are stupid.

patrick brown is garbage 32 year old 4th liner with 25 points in 150 games. he was so garbage he only played 11 games for the bruins last year.
jaxon nelson is a nothing special prospect. how the **** are those 2 going to get you the 14th and 33rd picks. adding a 3rd is barely adding any value.

Like dude use some common sense. I could show this proposal to 100 new hockey fans and at least 99% would not be stupid enough to think that proposal is fair in anyway. the 1% will be the guy with brain damage. is that guy you


dude, you just made my day, to take something so serious when it is literally just thinking out loud. Trying to find a way for more picks and a center. Be butthurt if you would like, I just started looking at contracts and trades as a part of hockey I pay attention to. To insult someone who is just beginning to look at that side really says something about your character lmao
6 juin à 15 h 37
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 49
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: depthsgaming2024
dude, you just made my day, to take something so serious when it is literally just thinking out loud. Trying to find a way for more picks and a center. Be butthurt if you would like, I just started looking at contracts and trades as a part of hockey I pay attention to. To insult someone who is just beginning to look at that side really says something about your character lmao


Sorry man, the folks around here take all this VERY seriously. Don't give up. Lurk a bit and you'll get the hang of how it all works.
6 juin à 15 h 39
#21
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 11,118
Mentions "j'aime": 7,892
Quoting: depthsgaming2024
Only thinking because Gibson isn't that great, and Ullmark could add for them. Peeke played well for the Bruins. also, Zegras and Anaheim aren't working out from my understanding. Again, just thinking out loud like the name said. I want picks and a good center.


Quoting: depthsgaming2024
As mentioned in the description, I have no idea of the trades other than the anaheim one which i put a bit of thought into. Peeke performed really well and Gibson isn't amazing so they could get rid of him. This was just a thinking out loud anyways. try and get picks with something for Ullmark. Zegras and Anaheim aren't working out from what I understand


To start with, Gibson is a good goalie. Our defense was better than the season prior, but we had 3 rookies and Radio Gudas as our upgrades, and we're still running waivers claims throughout the season. Not the utter dog **** defense of 2022/23, but still nowhere near "good" either. Gibsons 5v5 GSAX numbers were fine, he got killed on the PK, as the Ducks were the most heavily penalized team in the league by a wide margin. At one point in the season the gap between the Ducks and 2nd most penalized was more than the gap between 2nd most penalized and least penalized.

Second, a year of a 30 year old second best on his current team goalie only holds value to a team looking to make the push from contender to champ, that's not the Ducks, and even to a team who would value Ullmark, retention would certainly be required to maximize value, even then, he doesn't pull a player like Zegras.

The rumours are the same as they've always been, teams are calling Verbeek about Z, he's not being shopped, Anaheim isn't looking to unload him. Like any player, a sufficient offer can get him, but he's under contract for two more seasons and his RFA rights are intact after that, we've got all the time in the world for an offer we like to appear, or he just stays a Duck.
6 juin à 16 h 5
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 78
Mentions "j'aime": 33
Quoting: depthsgaming2024
dude, you just made my day, to take something so serious when it is literally just thinking out loud. Trying to find a way for more picks and a center. Be butthurt if you would like, I just started looking at contracts and trades as a part of hockey I pay attention to. To insult someone who is just beginning to look at that side really says something about your character lmao


stop making excuses. if you say you are a hockey fan how the **** do you not know that garbage players do not get 1st round picks. Its called using common sense. Go get your self checked you brain damaged idiot.

joining this site has nothing to do with using common sense. Do you not have any common sense. How do you function in society. 99% of hockey fans already know crap doesn't get you good ****. The other 1% have brain damage like you.

if you don't want to get called out stop posting crap. Your proposal for the sharks is literally some of the worst **** on this website. 2 garbage players for 2 good picks. wow
6 juin à 16 h 7
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 78
Mentions "j'aime": 33
Quoting: Shmael47
Sorry man, the folks around here take all this VERY seriously. Don't give up. Lurk a bit and you'll get the hang of how it all works.


lol. apparently calling out garbage proposals is bad now. its literally a trade site. He proposed an absolute trash proposal. Of course he is going to get called on it. any hockey fans knows that garbage doesn't get you good **** unless you have brain damage
6 juin à 18 h 14
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 49
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: karlsson65
lol. apparently calling out garbage proposals is bad now. its literally a trade site. He proposed an absolute trash proposal. Of course he is going to get called on it. any hockey fans knows that garbage doesn't get you good **** unless you have brain damage


It's a matter of trying to foster a community, my online friend. All it takes is a little care in how to express your opinion. 'I think your trade is really bad because..' instead of 'What, are you stupid?'

I really enjoy this forum as I get to interact with other fan bases and toss about ideas that have to adhere to the often confusing NHL rules. The part where users are meanspirited can be jarring to new users. I think OP can understand from the well worded responses above their posts shortcomings. I'm not a mod but as a relatively new user; I tried to encourage him to keep trying.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage