SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Penguins Realistic 30

Créé par: pixiesfanyo
Équipe: 2024-25 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 24 mai 2024
Publié: 24 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 100 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
32 950 000 $
13 100 000 $
22 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Brännström, Erik [Droits de RFA]
OTT
  1. Joseph, Pierre-Olivier [Droits de RFA]
2.
COL
  1. Smith, Reilly (2 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (PHI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2026
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 700 000 $87 529 342 $0 $0 $170 658 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 375 000 $5 375 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 mai à 13 h 41
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,607
Mentions "j'aime": 3,860
You'll have to provide a reason for Ottawa to do that.
24 mai à 13 h 45
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,143
Mentions "j'aime": 452
With uncertainty of Landeskog and Nichushkin, wouldn't Colorado want to keep Ross around?
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
24 mai à 13 h 49
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 15
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: Play_Party_Hard
With uncertainty of Landeskog and Nichushkin, wouldn't Colorado want to keep Ross around?



I would assume that is the reason they accept the trade.

They get a top nine winger and cap space plus another asset to help fill out their depth.
24 mai à 13 h 49
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 15
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: sens65
You'll have to provide a reason for Ottawa to do that.


Brotherly love.
wardbell92 a aimé ceci.
24 mai à 13 h 52
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,607
Mentions "j'aime": 3,860
Quoting: pixiesfanyo
Brotherly love.


I think Ottawa cares more about having a good defense than brotherly love.
24 mai à 13 h 54
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 15
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: sens65
I think Ottawa cares more about having a good defense than brotherly love.


I assumed they wouldn't want to pay 2+ mil for a player that would potentially be their # 7. POJ can probably be signed for league minimum and battle it out with Klevin in camp.
24 mai à 14 h 14
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 846
Mentions "j'aime": 355
I would love Colton on the Pens. Perfect 3C for them. I wouldn't bother with the Trenin contract though. Pens need to leave some openings on the bottom 6 for young players. Or get rid of Acciari and sign Trenin, don't have room for both.
24 mai à 14 h 16
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,607
Mentions "j'aime": 3,860
Quoting: pixiesfanyo
I assumed they wouldn't want to pay 2+ mil for a player that would potentially be their # 7. POJ can probably be signed for league minimum and battle it out with Klevin in camp.


The Sens will probably trade Brannstrom and go with Kleven at $900k for the 6th spot.
24 mai à 14 h 21
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 10,330
Mentions "j'aime": 4,939
Avs decline and just play Colton on the wing.
M96N29 a aimé ceci.
24 mai à 14 h 26
#10
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 3,844
Mentions "j'aime": 614
Quoting: sens65
You'll have to provide a reason for Ottawa to do that.


can we stop acting like this is some huge loss of talent for OTT, it's not.

Not that it's some huge gain either.

Both of these players are severely flawed. Personally I wouldn't want to see either on any team.
24 mai à 14 h 38
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,607
Mentions "j'aime": 3,860
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
can we stop acting like this is some huge loss of talent for OTT, it's not.

Not that it's some huge gain either.

Both of these players are severely flawed. Personally I wouldn't want to see either on any team.


Ex-fu.cking-actly!

The Sens have absolutely no reason to make a lateral move. If they're trading Brannstrom its going to be for a pick, not for a player who plays the exact same role.
24 mai à 14 h 38
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 15
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: PensGMwannabe
I would love Colton on the Pens. Perfect 3C for them. I wouldn't bother with the Trenin contract though. Pens need to leave some openings on the bottom 6 for young players. Or get rid of Acciari and sign Trenin, don't have room for both.



Trenin brings a ton of what we need in terms of movement, forecheck and entries in our bottom six. I assume we could deal Eller or somebody in season if needed.
PensGMwannabe a aimé ceci.
24 mai à 14 h 38
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 15
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: sens65
Ex-fu.cking-actly!

The Sens have absolutely no reason to make a lateral move. If they're trading Brannstrom its going to be for a pick, not for a player who plays the exact same role.


What kind of pick would you expect for Brannstrom, I'd give up POJ's rights and a 7th.
sens65 a aimé ceci.
24 mai à 14 h 49
#14
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 3,844
Mentions "j'aime": 614
Quoting: pixiesfanyo
What kind of pick would you expect for Brannstrom, I'd give up POJ's rights and a 7th.


may i ask, what is the point of adding a player you feel so poorly about that what you would give up for them is basically well nothing?
I mean really. It's a waste of time.
24 mai à 15 h 3
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 15
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
may i ask, what is the point of adding a player you feel so poorly about that what you would give up for them is basically well nothing?
I mean really. It's a waste of time.


Concept of the entire roster is Penguins dropping age in multiple roles. Brannstrom likely fits better in our top four than POJ.
24 mai à 15 h 10
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,607
Mentions "j'aime": 3,860
Quoting: pixiesfanyo
What kind of pick would you expect for Brannstrom, I'd give up POJ's rights and a 7th.


Well, we don't want POJ.

I'd say he's worth a late 2nd or early 3rd.
24 mai à 15 h 16
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 1,095
Mentions "j'aime": 1,279
Quoting: pixiesfanyo
I would assume that is the reason they accept the trade.

They get a top nine winger and cap space plus another asset to help fill out their depth.


Isn't Ross Colton just a better top 9 forward that's cheaper?
24 mai à 17 h 45
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 15
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: swissmontana
Isn't Ross Colton just a better top 9 forward that's cheaper?



Penguins would be saving Avs 1.5 mil and removing contract commitments with retention.
24 mai à 17 h 45
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 15
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: sens65
Well, we don't want POJ.

I'd say he's worth a late 2nd or early 3rd.


Don't see it, but fair enough.
sens65 a aimé ceci.
24 mai à 20 h 58
#20
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 3,844
Mentions "j'aime": 614
Quoting: sens65
Well, we don't want POJ.

I'd say he's worth a late 2nd or early 3rd.


on no planet is he worth a 2nd or early 3rd.

Quoting: pixiesfanyo
Concept of the entire roster is Penguins dropping age in multiple roles. Brannstrom likely fits better in our top four than POJ.


Neither one of them belongs in our top 4. They both belong in the AHL.
25 mai à 9 h 39
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 1,095
Mentions "j'aime": 1,279
Quoting: pixiesfanyo
Penguins would be saving Avs 1.5 mil and removing contract commitments with retention.


I missed the retention. regardless, there's no way the Avs are trading a better player, 1.5mil savings or not, for a worse player. $4mil is a good number for 3C.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage