SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Havent seen anyone do this yet

Équipe: 2024-25 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 22 mai 2024
Publié: 22 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 350 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 850 000 $
55 000 000 $
66 500 000 $
64 750 000 $
34 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Chychrun, Jakob
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
OTT
  1. Hronek, Filip [Droits de RFA]
2.
VAN
    To any team willing
    ANA
    1. Mikheyev, Ilya
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de VAN
    2025
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    2026
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2287 700 000 $87 676 667 $0 $80 000 $23 333 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    11 600 000 $11 600 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 8
    4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    825 000 $825 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    RFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    G
    RFA
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    816 667 $816 667 $
    AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    838 333 $838 333 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
    DG
    RFA - 3

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    22 mai à 17 h 16
    #1
    alwaysnextyear
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 5,716
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,652
    I've seen the Hronek-for-Chychrun idea batted around on here a couple times. In the end it doesn't make a ton of sense for VAN as Chychrun is apparently not good on the right side of the ice, which is where the Canucks' bigger need is.
    MeetYourMakar a aimé ceci.
    22 mai à 17 h 24
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2024
    Messages: 2,975
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,426
    Quoting: alwaysnextyear
    I've seen the Hronek-for-Chychrun idea batted around on here a couple times. In the end it doesn't make a ton of sense for VAN as Chychrun is apparently not good on the right side of the ice, which is where the Canucks' bigger need is.


    Our best pair (only played 140 minutes together) was Sanderson - Chychrun.
    Borocop a aimé ceci.
    22 mai à 17 h 46
    #3
    alwaysnextyear
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 5,716
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,652
    Quoting: StutzlesNumber1Fan
    Our best pair (only played 140 minutes together) was Sanderson - Chychrun.


    Interesting... a few on here seemed to think he wasn't as good on the right side as on the left.
    22 mai à 17 h 48
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2024
    Messages: 2,975
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,426
    Quoting: alwaysnextyear
    Interesting... a few on here seemed to think he wasn't as good on the right side as on the left.


    He is far better on the left side yes, but if you give him a good partner he can do it fine. They tried it with Chabot - Chych and he didn't look great but that's because him and Chabot are just to similar, he needs a nice defensive partner.
    Borocop a aimé ceci.
    22 mai à 19 h 24
    #5
    YARRRR!!!!
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2024
    Messages: 220
    Mentions "j'aime": 100
    Quoting: alwaysnextyear
    Interesting... a few on here seemed to think he wasn't as good on the right side as on the left.


    For the most part, Chychrun can adapt to either side depending on who he's partnered with. He is a Left D, but also plays his fair share on Right D.

    As said by StutzlesNumber1Fan, Sandy-Chychrun pairing was as elite as we got, Chabby-Chychrun struggled to find their rhythm but still did OK, but they mostly had Chabby on Chychruns right side when they were paired.

    Either way, whatever team lands Chychrun is going to benefit.
    StutzlesNumber1Fan a aimé ceci.
    22 mai à 21 h 48
    #6
    Au-revoir Dorion
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 5,074
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,324
    Quoting: alwaysnextyear
    Interesting... a few on here seemed to think he wasn't as good on the right side as on the left.


    Quoting: StutzlesNumber1Fan
    He is far better on the left side yes, but if you give him a good partner he can do it fine. They tried it with Chabot - Chych and he didn't look great but that's because him and Chabot are just to similar, he needs a nice defensive partner.


    to me his biggest problems were he could not transition the puck at all off the right side and general defensive effort. That was never an issue when he was paired with sanderson. If you can get him on the left, or honestly pair him with quinn hughes he could be okay. You’d just have to be willing to live with some of the issues. He’s still got great ability in the O zone and has a cannon shot
    StutzlesNumber1Fan a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage