SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Smart Decisions

Créé par: BarSouthBeauties
Équipe: 2017-18 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 15 juill. 2017
Publié: 26 juill. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
42 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2018 (CGY)
2.
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2018 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de LAK
Logo de TOR
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2275 000 000 $65 572 500 $5 370 000 $4 550 000 $9 427 500 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
612 500 $612 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 2
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AD, AG, C
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
UFA - 5
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 2
843 333 $843 333 $
DD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 juill. 2017 à 18 h 30
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 724
Mentions "j'aime": 100
Don't see the benefit to the Leafs trading 55 point Bozak. for 43 point Duchene. Imagine the Leafs would prefer Gardiner over Barrie too. Leafs need cap space soon, and Duchene and Barrie seem like at 11.5 seem too much.
Not having JVR hurts the Leafs considerably at left wing.
BStone67 a aimé ceci.
26 juill. 2017 à 18 h 33
#2
Démarrer sujet
BarSouthBeauties27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Get rid of some contracts and send the U of Denver boys back to their second home lol! Colorado only has 38 contracts so they can take on the cap space, number of contracts and these players instantly help next year. Toronto clears the contracts, cap space, turnover machine/softy Jake Gardiner and gets a great haul in return!
26 juill. 2017 à 18 h 34
#3
Démarrer sujet
BarSouthBeauties27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Duchene would thrive under Babcock; always does internationally!
26 juill. 2017 à 18 h 42
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 724
Mentions "j'aime": 100
Sorry you haven't seen Gardiner lately, he would be best Avs Dman by a wide margin. Sorry it's the NHL, not international hockey. Leafs finish out of the playoffs with these moves.
26 juill. 2017 à 18 h 46
#5
Démarrer sujet
BarSouthBeauties27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 1
I've seen the turnovers, lost battles in front of the net, the "long pass" that he never connects on which means atleast 3 more icings a game = atleast 3 more defensive zone starts = 3 blatantly higher chances of being scored on a game coming directly from Gardiner.
26 juill. 2017 à 18 h 57
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 724
Mentions "j'aime": 100
As I said, you haven't seen Gardiner lately. He may have been the Leafs best dman last year, and that is team that made playoffs. The impression on Barrie is, his game his regressed considerably, But if Gardiner is so bad as you suggest, why would any team want him?
Nice that you somehow made 43 point Duchene the second line centre. Gee, how is 43 points better now than 55 point Bozak, and 61 point Kadri. As suggested by others, Avs fans have been drinking Joe Sakic's lemonade.
Barrie, Landeskog, Duchene might play better than new teams, but right now there are overpaid guys who got there big contracts and have declined.
There might be teams that would interest in Duchene, I'm thinking Carolina might need forwards
26 juill. 2017 à 19 h 28
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 400
Mentions "j'aime": 61
Quoting: orignalsix
Don't see the benefit to the Leafs trading 55 point Bozak. for 43 point Duchene. Imagine the Leafs would prefer Gardiner over Barrie too. Leafs need cap space soon, and Duchene and Barrie seem like at 11.5 seem too much.
Not having JVR hurts the Leafs considerably at left wing.


everyone that isn't a delusional leafs fan sees this trade being the leafs trading a pile of garbage for a good pp dman and a very good center in duchene
goldie078 a aimé ceci.
26 juill. 2017 à 19 h 29
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 400
Mentions "j'aime": 61
Quoting: orignalsix
As I said, you haven't seen Gardiner lately. He may have been the Leafs best dman last year, and that is team that made playoffs. The impression on Barrie is, his game his regressed considerably, But if Gardiner is so bad as you suggest, why would any team want him?
Nice that you somehow made 43 point Duchene the second line centre. Gee, how is 43 points better now than 55 point Bozak, and 61 point Kadri. As suggested by others, Avs fans have been drinking Joe Sakic's lemonade.
Barrie, Landeskog, Duchene might play better than new teams, but right now there are overpaid guys who got there big contracts and have declined.
There might be teams that would interest in Duchene, I'm thinking Carolina might need forwards


yea, because the world only existed last year. duchene is a very good player.
26 juill. 2017 à 20 h 7
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 291
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Gardiner, Bozak and JVR didn't drop the ball last season, Duchene and Barrie heavily let their team down. Barrie was a -34 with only 40 minutes played on the PK, and that's kind of atrocious. It's a downgrade for a higher price in my opinion, and Babcock loves Gardiners ability to control the play and puck possession.

Duchene only notched 43 points last season, and yes let's say we forget last season, still, he's only ever got more than 60 points twice in 8 years and has struggled with injuries a lot of that time, too, along with inconsistency. He could thrive under Babcock, but at the asking price Sakic has set (not this horribly out of control trade) it's really not worth it. The Leafs have Bozak, who can contribute and has a great mentor quality with the team, and great chemistry with the players already.

If we do grab Duchene and Barrie and they do both exceed expectations under Babcock, then they'll ask for a raise when their contracts are up in a couple years and the Leafs will be forced to let them walk for nothing or try to trade them depending on where the Leafs sit in the standings that year. It seems like a really pointless trade for both teams, because either we get players who are coming off a horrid season with expensive contracts that don't get better and flop still, or we get two players who rebound and become successful that we won't be able to afford and gave up futures to get them.

As for the trade, it's definitely not gonna work, since Sakic is over asking and you won't get those players from them for that price, even if it's a quality center, a top 4 D and a blue chip prospect with a few rag tag players in there.
26 juill. 2017 à 20 h 26
#10
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,251
Mentions "j'aime": 23,112
Quoting: BStone67
Gardiner, Bozak and JVR didn't drop the ball last season, Duchene and Barrie heavily let their team down. Barrie was a -34 with only 40 minutes played on the PK, and that's kind of atrocious. It's a downgrade for a higher price in my opinion, and Babcock loves Gardiners ability to control the play and puck possession.

Duchene only notched 43 points last season, and yes let's say we forget last season, still, he's only ever got more than 60 points twice in 8 years and has struggled with injuries a lot of that time, too, along with inconsistency. He could thrive under Babcock, but at the asking price Sakic has set (not this horribly out of control trade) it's really not worth it. The Leafs have Bozak, who can contribute and has a great mentor quality with the team, and great chemistry with the players already.

If we do grab Duchene and Barrie and they do both exceed expectations under Babcock, then they'll ask for a raise when their contracts are up in a couple years and the Leafs will be forced to let them walk for nothing or try to trade them depending on where the Leafs sit in the standings that year. It seems like a really pointless trade for both teams, because either we get players who are coming off a horrid season with expensive contracts that don't get better and flop still, or we get two players who rebound and become successful that we won't be able to afford and gave up futures to get them.

As for the trade, it's definitely not gonna work, since Sakic is over asking and you won't get those players from them for that price, even if it's a quality center, a top 4 D and a blue chip prospect with a few rag tag players in there.


Bozak and Gardiner for Duchene and Barrie could be debated as equal trade. And some of the other pieces don't add much, but the Leafs wouldn't want to give up on Bracco. Yea you would think if Duchene and Barrie were so good, they would have been traded for now. But as suggested earlier, Sakic is asking too much for two players that are not living up too their contracts. I'm sure the Leafs who are kinda in a win now mode, don't want to babysit Duchene and Barrie and run the risk they aren't as good as the two pieces they traded away. Barrie might be able to help a PP, but the Leafs had the second best PP last year. Is he really gong to help there?
BStone67 a aimé ceci.
26 juill. 2017 à 20 h 34
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 291
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: palhal
Quoting: BStone67
Gardiner, Bozak and JVR didn't drop the ball last season, Duchene and Barrie heavily let their team down. Barrie was a -34 with only 40 minutes played on the PK, and that's kind of atrocious. It's a downgrade for a higher price in my opinion, and Babcock loves Gardiners ability to control the play and puck possession.

Duchene only notched 43 points last season, and yes let's say we forget last season, still, he's only ever got more than 60 points twice in 8 years and has struggled with injuries a lot of that time, too, along with inconsistency. He could thrive under Babcock, but at the asking price Sakic has set (not this horribly out of control trade) it's really not worth it. The Leafs have Bozak, who can contribute and has a great mentor quality with the team, and great chemistry with the players already.

If we do grab Duchene and Barrie and they do both exceed expectations under Babcock, then they'll ask for a raise when their contracts are up in a couple years and the Leafs will be forced to let them walk for nothing or try to trade them depending on where the Leafs sit in the standings that year. It seems like a really pointless trade for both teams, because either we get players who are coming off a horrid season with expensive contracts that don't get better and flop still, or we get two players who rebound and become successful that we won't be able to afford and gave up futures to get them.

As for the trade, it's definitely not gonna work, since Sakic is over asking and you won't get those players from them for that price, even if it's a quality center, a top 4 D and a blue chip prospect with a few rag tag players in there.


Bozak and Gardiner for Duchene and Barrie could be debated as equal trade. And some of the other pieces don't add much, but the Leafs wouldn't want to give up on Bracco. Yea you would think if Duchene and Barrie were so good, they would have been traded for now. But as suggested earlier, Sakic is asking too much for two players that are not living up too their contracts. I'm sure the Leafs who are kinda in a win now mode, don't want to babysit Duchene and Barrie and run the risk they aren't as good as the two pieces they traded away. Barrie might be able to help a PP, but the Leafs had the second best PP last year. Is he really gong to help there?


I agree completely, and to be honest, I don't think he'd help on the PP that much if at all. It's not worth it for the Leafs to gamble when they're trying to win and maintain the ability to win for years, and this trade of moving two solid roster players plus Bracco seems like it would hurt our overall chance to win now and in the future. Bozak and Gardiner know the system, and to replace them and try to make two struggling players pick up a whole new system and take key positions on the team just seems like a risk that I don't think the Leafs should take
palhal a aimé ceci.
26 juill. 2017 à 20 h 43
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 400
Mentions "j'aime": 61
Quoting: palhal
Quoting: BStone67
Gardiner, Bozak and JVR didn't drop the ball last season, Duchene and Barrie heavily let their team down. Barrie was a -34 with only 40 minutes played on the PK, and that's kind of atrocious. It's a downgrade for a higher price in my opinion, and Babcock loves Gardiners ability to control the play and puck possession.

Duchene only notched 43 points last season, and yes let's say we forget last season, still, he's only ever got more than 60 points twice in 8 years and has struggled with injuries a lot of that time, too, along with inconsistency. He could thrive under Babcock, but at the asking price Sakic has set (not this horribly out of control trade) it's really not worth it. The Leafs have Bozak, who can contribute and has a great mentor quality with the team, and great chemistry with the players already.

If we do grab Duchene and Barrie and they do both exceed expectations under Babcock, then they'll ask for a raise when their contracts are up in a couple years and the Leafs will be forced to let them walk for nothing or try to trade them depending on where the Leafs sit in the standings that year. It seems like a really pointless trade for both teams, because either we get players who are coming off a horrid season with expensive contracts that don't get better and flop still, or we get two players who rebound and become successful that we won't be able to afford and gave up futures to get them.

As for the trade, it's definitely not gonna work, since Sakic is over asking and you won't get those players from them for that price, even if it's a quality center, a top 4 D and a blue chip prospect with a few rag tag players in there.


Bozak and Gardiner for Duchene and Barrie could be debated as equal trade. And some of the other pieces don't add much, but the Leafs wouldn't want to give up on Bracco. Yea you would think if Duchene and Barrie were so good, they would have been traded for now. But as suggested earlier, Sakic is asking too much for two players that are not living up too their contracts. I'm sure the Leafs who are kinda in a win now mode, don't want to babysit Duchene and Barrie and run the risk they aren't as good as the two pieces they traded away. Barrie might be able to help a PP, but the Leafs had the second best PP last year. Is he really gong to help there?


oh my goodness.
26 juill. 2017 à 21 h 34
#13
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,251
Mentions "j'aime": 23,112
Quoting: BarSouthBeauties
I've seen the turnovers, lost battles in front of the net, the "long pass" that he never connects on which means atleast 3 more icings a game = atleast 3 more defensive zone starts = 3 blatantly higher chances of being scored on a game coming directly from Gardiner.


Sure you have. You also wrote the this would help the Leafs cap. They would get 11.5m from the Avs and only give 8.25 to the Avs. Minor leaguers don't hurt the cap space.

BStone, agree with your statements but it's difficult to argue against unknowledgeable hockey fans and/or Leaf haters and/or two guys that love to troll.
BStone67 a aimé ceci.
26 juill. 2017 à 21 h 34
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 291
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: grovercleveland
Quoting: palhal


Bozak and Gardiner for Duchene and Barrie could be debated as equal trade. And some of the other pieces don't add much, but the Leafs wouldn't want to give up on Bracco. Yea you would think if Duchene and Barrie were so good, they would have been traded for now. But as suggested earlier, Sakic is asking too much for two players that are not living up too their contracts. I'm sure the Leafs who are kinda in a win now mode, don't want to babysit Duchene and Barrie and run the risk they aren't as good as the two pieces they traded away. Barrie might be able to help a PP, but the Leafs had the second best PP last year. Is he really gong to help there?


oh my goodness.


Sorry Grover, saw your thing earlier and had to point out that Duchene isn't as stellar of a center as he's being piped up to be. He's good, no doubt, but not worth a trade like this or whatever Sakic is asking, and has a bad history of inconsistency and struggles.
26 juill. 2017 à 21 h 36
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 291
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: palhal
Quoting: BarSouthBeauties
I've seen the turnovers, lost battles in front of the net, the "long pass" that he never connects on which means atleast 3 more icings a game = atleast 3 more defensive zone starts = 3 blatantly higher chances of being scored on a game coming directly from Gardiner.


Sure you have. You also wrote the this would help the Leafs cap. They would get 11.5m from the Avs and only give 8.25 to the Avs. Minor leaguers don't hurt the cap space.

BStone, agree with your statements but it's difficult to argue against unknowledgeable hockey fans and/or Leaf haters and/or two guys that love to troll.


You're totally right palhal, and with that, I bid adieu to this post and onto others
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage