SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Calgary fun

Créé par: dougbailey
Équipe: 2024-25 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 10 mai 2024
Publié: 10 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
11 250 000 $
11 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
34 500 000 $
23 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Allen, Jake
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Markström, Jacob
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (TBL)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (TBL)
TBL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VGK
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de TBL
Logo de CGY
Logo de TBL
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de VGK
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $76 134 167 $0 $1 062 500 $7 365 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 7
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 mai à 17 h 19
#1
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 13,287
Mentions "j'aime": 3,579
Nope. Unretained markstrom simply is not remotely close to fetching a top 10 pick
10 mai à 17 h 20
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 149
Mentions "j'aime": 11
what is?
10 mai à 17 h 23
#3
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 13,287
Mentions "j'aime": 3,579
Quoting: dougbailey
what is?


The only things of real interest to NJD for that pick would be rasmus andersson. Or zary+
10 mai à 17 h 25
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 149
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Are you saying Markstrom, Anderson, and the Vancouver 1st-round pick for pick 9?
10 mai à 17 h 26
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 3,005
Mentions "j'aime": 1,068
TB has a player they really want at that point sure why not.
Brolekb2b a aimé ceci.
10 mai à 17 h 28
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 149
Mentions "j'aime": 11
It's more of a way to stagger the picks for Calgary over the years. TB doesn't have early picks in 24, so I thought it might be a convenience trade.
10 mai à 17 h 30
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,437
Mentions "j'aime": 20,280
Nee Jersey isn't trading Allen, remove him and add retention to Markstrom. Then the deal is much closer
10 mai à 21 h 20
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 8,239
Mentions "j'aime": 3,395
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Nee Jersey isn't trading Allen, remove him and add retention to Markstrom. Then the deal is much closer


Calgary would rather take on Allen's last year than retain on Markstrom.
10 mai à 21 h 22
#9
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 13,287
Mentions "j'aime": 3,579
Quoting: dougbailey
Are you saying Markstrom, Anderson, and the Vancouver 1st-round pick for pick 9?


I am saying Andersson 1 for 1 for 10th overall.

Or Zary+Van 1st for 10th+3rd
10 mai à 21 h 22
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,437
Mentions "j'aime": 20,280
Quoting: MoxNix
Calgary would rather take on Allen's last year than retain on Markstrom.


Obviously but all reports are that New Jersey wants Allen to be their backup next season. Also there is no chance NJD would give us 10th OA with Marky at 6M
10 mai à 21 h 23
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,437
Mentions "j'aime": 20,280
Quoting: dgibb10
I am saying Andersson 1 for 1 for 10th overall.

Or Zary+Van 1st for 10th+3rd


Gotta add to #10 for Andersson. Just like #12 wasn't enough for Chychrun

The hope is you are getting a Zary caliber prospect at #10 so no chance Calgary would do that
10 mai à 21 h 25
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 8,239
Mentions "j'aime": 3,395
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Obviously but all reports are that New Jersey wants Allen to be their backup next season. Also there is no chance NJD would give us 10th OA with Marky at 6M


That's just fine with Calgary, it's better for us if they keep Allen but retention costs extra especially since it's for 2 full years not a prorated cap hit deadline rental. Maybe it'd be ok if it was just 1 mil/yr but you know some jersey fans are going to cry they want Marky at 50% retained for a bag of pucks.
10 mai à 21 h 27
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,437
Mentions "j'aime": 20,280
Quoting: MoxNix
That's just fine with Calgary but retention costs extra especially since it's for 2 full years not a prorated cap hit deadline rental.


Yes, and the pick is 10th OA...

When the trade discussions were taking place back in late February/early March it was pretty expected that Markstrom would get New Jersey into the playoffs, which would drop that 1st to at earliest 17th, hell they probably would have finished ahead of NYI
10 mai à 21 h 29
#14
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 13,287
Mentions "j'aime": 3,579
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Gotta add to #10 for Andersson. Just like #12 wasn't enough for Chychrun

The hope is you are getting a Zary caliber prospect at #10 so no chance Calgary would do that


The hope is you get someone much better than Zary at 10. But I very much understand why Calgary would pass. I would too as Calgary. But it was more so off the dome.


I don’t think I’d add to 10th overall for Andersson. If Buffalo for example wants to add to 11th and outbid us, which I could see as a very real possibility, I’d tap out there.
10 mai à 21 h 29
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 8,239
Mentions "j'aime": 3,395
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Yes, and the pick is 10th OA...

When the trade discussions were taking place back in late February/early March it was pretty expected that Markstrom would get New Jersey into the playoffs, which would drop that 1st to at earliest 17th, hell they probably would have finished ahead of NYI


Yeah I was figuring around 16/17 myself... Either just make the playoffs or just miss them.
10 mai à 21 h 43
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,437
Mentions "j'aime": 20,280
Quoting: dgibb10
The hope is you get someone much better than Zary at 10.

I don’t think I’d add to 10th overall for Andersson. If Buffalo for example wants to add to 11th and outbid us, which I could see as a very real possibility, I’d tap out there.


Zary is projecting into a very good 2C, Brock Nelson or Vinny Trocheck caliber player. I'm not sure what you are expecting from #10 OA. I would say if that's his projection then that is pretty close to average for players picked around 10th OA over the last 15 years. Were there better? Yes, but where there worse? Also yes.

I don't know why NJ would want Andersson at all, they are set on RD, but #10 by itself would not get it done
MoxNix a aimé ceci.
10 mai à 21 h 44
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,437
Mentions "j'aime": 20,280
Quoting: MoxNix
Yeah I was figuring around 16/17 myself... Either just make the playoffs or just miss them.


Since February 20th (roughly when the talks really started picking up) NJ had 15 games where they had 4+ goals against
10 mai à 21 h 58
#18
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 13,287
Mentions "j'aime": 3,579
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Zary is projecting into a very good 2C, Brock Nelson or Vinny Trocheck caliber player. I'm not sure what you are expecting from #10 OA. I would say if that's his projection then that is pretty close to average for players picked around 10th OA over the last 15 years. Were there better? Yes, but where there worse? Also yes.

I don't know why NJ would want Andersson at all, they are set on RD, but #10 by itself would not get it done


Andersson is an excellent dman, which is what makes him a target. At that point I’d combine with it a trade such as the one thrown out constantly if Marino for Samuelsson. He’s certainly not a NEED, and so I wouldn’t be getting into a bidding war, but I’d certainly pay for him and 10th overall is a hefty price for almost any player.

Maybe you’re right about Zary. The lack of overall resume is a touch concerning because he didn’t make the NHL until 21. And maybe I’m a touch low on his upside. He feels like a high floor lower ceiling type player in my eyes, but there may just be something I’m not seeing. I fully expect Calgary to keep him and we’ll see how he develops. I wish him the best of luck.
10 mai à 22 h 19
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 8,239
Mentions "j'aime": 3,395
Modifié 10 mai à 22 h 45
Ok here's my take on Markstrom.

He's very good positionally, maybe the very best in that way. He looks great as long as the team in front of him plays sound structured defense. When things are going as he expects he's always in the right spot, tracks the puck well, knows what the defense will do before it happens and covers a lot of the net just due to sheer size.

But he's not quick and his reflexes are slow. When things go wrong, the team is having a bad game or the defensive structure breaks down momentariy he doesn't have the reflexes (especially not in his glove hand) to make the big save. When facing a good sniper with quick accurate shot who has a little time and space he's like a deer frozen in the headlights the puck either hits him or it's in the net before he reacts.

I know whenever I see another team's sniper with even a partial breakaway with Marky in net I'm like "oh no, they're going to score" and they usually do... When it's anyone else in net I'm like "Sure glad it's not Marky in net... Come on you can make the save" and they often do, more often than Marky anyhow.

That is why his numbers dropped off so much after half the starting defense was traded away. Put him on a team with a good defensive corps and sound defensive structure and he'll be fine. Put him on a team with a shaky young defense or an offense first team and he'll be nothing but an expensive disaster.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage