SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Grier Wagon

Créé par: NHLfan10506
Équipe: 2024-25 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 7 mai 2024
Publié: 7 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
San Jose was the right spot for Celebrini.

If they could move up and grab Buium, they could own the rights to one-quarter of the top-20 NCAA leading point producers from 2023-24

Name...............................ppg

1. Will Smith....................1.78
3. Macklin Celebrini.......1.68
9. Collin Graf...................1.44
14. Luke Grainger...........1.26
D2. Zeev Buium..............1.20
99. Cam Lund.................0.86
D22. Eric Pohlkamp.......0.75
D65. Jeremie Bucheler..0.55


If a team owned the same from 2022-23

1. Adam Fantilli.............1.81
3. Logan Cooley............1.54
9. Jimmy Snuggerud.....1.25
14. Massimo Rizzo........1.21
D2. Luke Hughes...........1.23
99. Jack Devine...............0.83
D22. Ryan Ufko..............0.75
D65. Cole McWard.........0.54


Wagon

(Head Coach Jay Pandolfo next?)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
3950 000 $
Grainger, Luke
3950 000 $
Buium, Zeev
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (ARI)
Détails additionnels:
Moving up to #6 (ish)
ARI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
2.
SJS
    ....for Zeev
    ARI
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de SJS
    2025
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de NJD
    2026
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2887 700 000 $33 505 833 $0 $2 107 500 $54 194 167 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG
    RFA - 2
    Celebrini, Macklin
    950 000 $950 000 $
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    941 667 $941 667 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
    AD, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    918 333 $918 333 $
    AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    918 333 $918 333 $
    C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    918 333 $918 333 $
    C
    RFA - 3
    Grainger, Luke
    950 000 $950 000 $
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Buium, Zeev
    950 000 $950 000 $
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    950 000 $950 000 $
    DD
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DD
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    910 000 $910 000 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DG
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    950 000 $950 000 $
    DD
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    841 667 $841 667 $ (Bonis de performance12 500 $$12K)
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    950 000 $950 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    836 667 $836 667 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    950 000 $950 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    797 500 $797 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD
    RFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    7 mai à 20 h 52
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2022
    Messages: 2,983
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,060
    They're a lot more likely to package 3-4 of those seconds to move up than move down. They have 10 seconds in the next three drafts.
    7 mai à 21 h 0
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 41,851
    Mentions "j'aime": 18,997
    Quoting: Dan_the_Man
    They're a lot more likely to package 3-4 of those seconds to move up than move down. They have 10 seconds in the next three drafts.


    TEN!

    It doesn't have to be Arizona/Utah...any place for SJS to move up and grab Buium.
    7 mai à 21 h 27
    #3
    CELEBRINI IS A SHARK
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 10,180
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,899
    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    TEN!

    It doesn't have to be Arizona/Utah...any place for SJS to move up and grab Buium.


    I could see Seattle, the Sens, or Utah moving down.
    Most Probable : Seattle
    Ideal for SJS : Utah
    Wildcard : Sens

    Parekh or Buium I’m happy with. I’ve tended to lean towards Zayne due to RD. But I can’t complain whichever Z I could hear.
    7 mai à 21 h 55
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 41,851
    Mentions "j'aime": 18,997
    Quoting: yikes
    I could see Seattle, the Sens, or Utah moving down.
    Most Probable : Seattle
    Ideal for SJS : Utah
    Wildcard : Sens

    Parekh or Buium I’m happy with. I’ve tended to lean towards Zayne due to RD. But I can’t complain whichever Z I could hear.


    Buium. Cool as a cucumber.

    It is one guy's opinion, but read Will Scouch on Zayne Parekh (#18).

    "There is no player I have ever tracked in my years of watching hundreds of performances a year like Zayne Parekh. He is one of the most extreme and polarized players I think I’ve ever seen. He’s the most productive draft-eligible defender in the OHL in decades and that can’t be ignored. Exploring things a bit more, my issues with Parekh lie in projecting him to the NHL. I know there are those that think his defensive shortcomings are overblown, but I can’t ignore what I’ve seen and tracked. If he’s not using his skating to track down errant breakouts, he’s not very involved in defensive rushes, and when he is, he’s often leaky and can get turned around and left behind. His defensive play along the boards is a mixed bag at best and I can’t set the number of times I’ve seen play not go his way outside of the offensive zone. The skill level and deceptive footwork along the offensive blueline is top of the class, but I also can’t help but downgrade a player, especially a defenseman, whose best traits come out once the puck is in the offensive zone. Parekh’s passing in transition is very hit or miss, and he very rarely strays from a low pace pass-first style of puck possession. He’s a massive shot volume player, and often from the perimeter which is difficult to project. That said, his ability to draw pressure and open space is very high end, his skill level is obvious, and I can’t deny that he doesn’t at least deserve to come up in discussions involving any of the players in this tier. I just can’t think of an NHL player that leans this heavily offensively and plays like Parekh does. I’ve heard Evan Bouchard, but he’s more of a puck carrier with an elite level shot from the point, and even Bouchard carries warts that makes fans and coaches crazy at times. Parekh is going to be fascinating to keep track on. There have been a ton of CHL defenders with a ton of production that have come and gone from the NHL over the last 5-10 years and after exploring those players, I have a hunch on what they have in common, and I can’t help but be concerned that Parekh may fall into that category as well. I’ve watched a ton of him. At times, he’s very impressive, but I simply can’t set aside the plays that Parekh falls short on and hope things work out."

    And Tony Ferrari on Zayne Parekh (#17)

    "I see what the public consensus is on Parekh and feel like I need to go back and check my assessments of the player. Every time I do, I think, “Wow, the offense is fun,” and then find myself wanting more from the player as a whole. There may not be a player in the class I have circled back on and re-watched after conversations with others more than Parekh. There is no denying he put together a special season in the OHL this year, coming up just short of 100 points as a blueliner. He will be one of the most intriguing players to watch at the Memorial Cup as he leads Saginaw in the pursuit of capturing the CHL’s top prize. His passing and shot creation in the offensive zone are so much fun. The kid can absolutely dish it. In transition, he is a solid passer who can get a bit too eager at times, which can result in turnovers. But that’s not really an issue, as he’s looking to create and will learn to pick his spots better. Opposing players are drawn into him when he has the puck, and Parekh can certainly stay calm and fire a pass at the very last second. There has been recent discussion online about his defensive flaws being overblown or a lazy narrative, but after watching him all year, circling back, reassessing and circling back again, I can’t deny what I have seen. Parekh can be passive and shy away from the play along the boards. I have seen him excuse himself from a puck race with a forechecker too often this season. Parekh has the tools to be a successful defensive player, even if he becomes an average defender using his skating and stick to do so. It’s just not there right now, unfortunately, and it’s among the bigger red flags in the draft class despite his all-world offensive game. I won’t be shocked if Parekh is a big point producer in the NHL, but does that mean he’s Evan Bouchard or Shayne Gostisbehere?"

    And Gabe Foley on Zayne Parekh (#14)

    "Zayne Parekh is a special, special player on the puck. Everything about his puck-control, edgework, ability to create chances, ability to finish chances… it’s all fantastic. And he could find stardom on that alone. This really is a great draft, isn’t it? But I find Parekh’s off-puck a bit too disengaged. He loses a lot of sharpness when he’s defending one-on-one and doesn’t force turnovers as consistently as I’d hope for. He has a lot of maturing and discipline to add to his game, and I hope his elite puck-skills persist through the growth. If they do, he could be a very, very exciting pro."

    I don't know much about Ferrari, but another poster recommended him. Scouch often has some unusual takes, but he does his homework. Foley knows his stuff too.

    I feel like the argument FOR Parekh is often done around point totals. The argument AGAINST talks about his attributes, skills. To me, that is not a great sign.
    yikes a aimé ceci.
    8 mai à 0 h 4
    #5
    RecycleShark
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2023
    Messages: 1,168
    Mentions "j'aime": 346
    Clever move. Quality over quantity.

    Celebrini is an fning Shark!
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage