SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Marner-less Leafs

Créé par: DealFinder67
Équipe: 2024-25 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 6 mai 2024
Publié: 6 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
45 250 000 $
21 500 000 $
43 750 000 $
43 750 000 $
22 500 000 $
21 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
SEA
  1. Marner, Mitchell
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
RFA rights to Lily
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2026 (SJS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2288 500 000 $83 166 667 $0 $0 $5 333 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
13 250 000 $13 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 500 000 $11 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DD
UFA
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
875 000 $875 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 mai à 9 h 32
#1
tmljk22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 371
Mentions "j'aime": 134
Value sort of makes sense if built on the framework of the Tkachuk deal with obviously lesser assets being the return. Don't know if Marner waives without a big extension agreed upon though. Bertuzzi also gets more in the open market, so does Nedeljkovic (which I wouldn't bite on).
DealFinder67 a aimé ceci.
6 mai à 9 h 32
#2
Leafs suck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,605
Mentions "j'aime": 905
I’ve proposed this exact trade on this website and I think it’s the best value trade for both teams. Seattle needs that high end talent and the leafs need offensive depth as well as right shot defence, and this is a great way to spread that marner money around and address those issues at the same time. The problem lies with Seattle. This is arguably their best forward and their third best defenceman. I think they should go for it though because they’re getting a guy who has almost scored 100 pts twice, which is more than anyone on Seattle has ever scored by a long shot. I know, playoffs, but it just hasn’t worked in Toronto. The guy has the talent and perhaps in a different situation he flourishes. I hope he does, but it has not worked here. I wonder if Seattle would ask for more, just due to how low his value is right now and his cap hit, but in my opinion this is perfect for the leafs.
DealFinder67 a aimé ceci.
6 mai à 16 h 5
#3
Démarrer sujet
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,265
Mentions "j'aime": 360
Quoting: tmljk22
Value sort of makes sense if built on the framework of the Tkachuk deal with obviously lesser assets being the return. Don't know if Marner waives without a big extension agreed upon though. Bertuzzi also gets more in the open market, so does Nedeljkovic (which I wouldn't bite on).


Quoting: tmljk22
Value sort of makes sense if built on the framework of the Tkachuk deal with obviously lesser assets being the return. Don't know if Marner waives without a big extension agreed upon though. Bertuzzi also gets more in the open market, so does Nedeljkovic (which I wouldn't bite on).


Don’t like Ned as a back up? Can give Bert more as we still have 5+M under the cap but can’t justify giving him more than Domi
6 mai à 16 h 5
#4
Démarrer sujet
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,265
Mentions "j'aime": 360
Quoting: mauston_atthews
I’ve proposed this exact trade on this website and I think it’s the best value trade for both teams. Seattle needs that high end talent and the leafs need offensive depth as well as right shot defence, and this is a great way to spread that marner money around and address those issues at the same time. The problem lies with Seattle. This is arguably their best forward and their third best defenceman. I think they should go for it though because they’re getting a guy who has almost scored 100 pts twice, which is more than anyone on Seattle has ever scored by a long shot. I know, playoffs, but it just hasn’t worked in Toronto. The guy has the talent and perhaps in a different situation he flourishes. I hope he does, but it has not worked here. I wonder if Seattle would ask for more, just due to how low his value is right now and his cap hit, but in my opinion this is perfect for the leafs.


Thank you for the comment and agree 100%. We get a D group looking similar to this and I think we will be ok
mauston_atthews a aimé ceci.
6 mai à 16 h 9
#5
tmljk22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 371
Mentions "j'aime": 134
Quoting: DealFinder67
Don’t like Ned as a back up? Can give Bert more as we still have 5+M under the cap but can’t justify giving him more than Domi


I'm not that big on Ned, I would likely try going another direction. If the price is right though why not
DealFinder67 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage