RONDE 1 | ÉQUIPE | ORIGINAL | JOUEUR | DéTAILS |
---|
1 | - | Obvious pick | ||
2 | - | Chicago has a TON of LHD prospects but really lacks that top RHD prospect. They get that here. Apparently they are high on Dickinson but I would be really surprised if they took another LHD. | ||
3 | - | Anaheim could really use a RHD in this draft but I don't think they reach on either Parekh or Yakemchuk at this pick. Demidov would make an already great young forward core for Anaheim even better. | ||
4 | - | Columbus has pretty much everything you could want prospect wise. So here they take a player with some of the biggest upside in the draft and hope he ends up as their 2C behind Fantilli. | ||
5 | - | Catton is a perfect fit for Montreal and would be a great fit behind Suzuki. Hopefully teams won't be stupid and let Catton fall because of his size like they did with Benson last year. | ||
6 | - | Arizona, now Utah, loves their big players and they get a freakishly big defender here. In my rankings Silayev has the highest upside of any player in this draft. | ||
7 | - | I personally am not a fan of Parekh but he does have electric offensive ability and Ottawa desperately needs a RHD. Parekh and Sanderson could form a deadly combo. | ||
8 | - | I compare Buium to Vince Dunn so it's fitting that he ends up here. Buium has had an incredible season in the NCAA and it wouldn't surprise me at all if he goes higher than this. | ||
9 | - | I know I know everyone is going to say if Iginla is here the Flames won't pass on him but what's more valuable a top 4 winger or a top 4 dman. Dickinson is one of the more NHL ready players in this draft and will likely end up as a Hanifin like player, and the Flames just opened up a Hanifin sized gap on their defense. | ||
10 | - | I thought about taking Yakemchuk here but with Hamiltons contract running for another 4 years and Nemec emerging as a potential star, New Jersey really doesn't have a need for a dman. Here, they get some sandpaper for their lineup and add a player who will show up in big moments and plays hard. Nygard would be a great compliment for the more skilled players in New Jersey. | ||
11 | - | Buffalo does NOT need any more forward prospects. They do need a future top 4 RHD so they go with the best one available. | ||
12 | - | The flyers are happy that Iginla dropped to them. I question Iginlas work ethic at times and a lot of times I've seen him play he's floating, but other times he shows amazing skill. It also could've just been a bad few games that I saw. | ||
13 | - | Chernyshov is a jack of all trades, master of none type player. He does everything good to very good but isn't great in one area. He's one of the more complete players in this draft and one of my favorites. I think he would fit in great with Minnesota. | ||
14 | I am not a fan of Eiserman but he does have an undeniable scoring talent. He could easily be a 40 goal scorer in the NHL if he wants to. San Jose can afford to take a risk on him and bet on his massive upside. | |||
15 | - | A perfect Yzerman pick and Helenius would be a great pickup for Detroit here. One note, I wouldn't be surprised if Helenius moves to the wing in the future. | ||
16 | - | St. Louis - The Blues need to go RHD here. I am more high on Elick than I am on Jiricek and I think others will become higher on Elick after he participates in the WJC tournament soon. | ||
17 | - | Washington - A nice blend of size and strength and would be a perfect compliment for Cristall in the future. | ||
18 | - | The Islanders get their long term 2C. | ||
19 | - | I feel like Freij is another player who will move up after the WJC and seems like a nice pick for Vegas. Whoever Vegas takes will likely be traded anyway. | ||
20 | Connelly will likely slip on draft day due to off ice issues and size concerns. Does Chicago take him with those off ice concerns, probably not but the idea of Bedard and Connelly together is too good to pass up. I also believe his off ice concerns have been addressed. | |||
21 | - | LA keeps on drafting centers, it's worked out well for them so far. | ||
22 | - | Jiricek came into the year as a top 10 pick but lots of injuries and poor play will drop him. All it takes is one team to take a chance on him though. Jiricek needs to add a lot of weight and that will solve most of his problems. | ||
23 | - | Toronto gets a speedy winger on a slight reach. | ||
24 | The Ducks get their future Gudas replacement. | |||
25 | - | Colorado gets one of the better defensive players in this draft and also one of the better skaters. This pick could turn into a steal. | ||
26 | Parascak will fall the same way Heidt fell last year. I think Ottawa puts an end to that fall. | |||
27 | Hemming is a very good complimentary player. I don't think he will ever be great but he could be a solid middle 6 option. | |||
28 | Kiviharju has a ton of potential and the Flyers can't afford to pass that up. His injury history and size are major concerns but the Flyers can afford to take the risk with their extra picks. | |||
29 | One of the better playmakers in this draft and putting up great production in the KHL, Montreal gets a steal here. | |||
30 | - | Seems like a Carolina pick. One of the better puck moving dmen in the draft. | ||
31 | - | Solid bottom 6, defensive center in the future. | ||
32 | - | A great defensive player with a questionable offensive ceiling. |
RONDE 2 | ÉQUIPE | ORIGINAL | JOUEUR | DéTAILS |
---|
33 | - | Really underrated player here. San Jose gets a future top 4 RHD. | ||
34 | - | Chicago gets a great puck mover and top PP quarterback in the future. | ||
35 | - | Anaheim replaces the loss of Drysdale with Mews. | ||
36 | One of the more NHL ready prospects as an overager, Philly probably gets another steal here. | |||
37 | One of my favorite players in the draft, I think Shuravin falls because of his poor production but he has the talent to be a really great player. | |||
38 | - | Big power forward that will likely be overdrafted. | ||
39 | - | One of the better players in the USHL and he should develop nicely going to Michigan. | ||
40 | - | Howe performed better with Bedard but I still think he has the makings of a future middle 6 center, likely on the 3rd line. He could slot in behind Wright and Beniers | ||
41 | - | A rare blend of size, speed, and skill, Fischer has all the traits of a top 4 defender and just needs to put them together. | ||
42 | The sharks get a really versatile forward here who can pretty much do a bit of everything. | |||
43 | - | Buffalo doubles down on RHD. | ||
44 | Needs to improve a lot especially his strength and skating but he could be a future top 6 player. High upside pick. | |||
45 | - | Big RHD with a lot of potential. He's already really solid defensively and his offensive game continues to get better. | ||
46 | - | A really solid all around player with a high floor. | ||
47 | - | How cool would it be for Detroit to have another Zetterberg. | ||
48 | Dean Letourneau | An absolutely massive Center who has equally massive upside goes to Utah here. I haven't seen Dean play but from what I've heard he is very much a boom or bust prospect. | ||
49 | - | The Blues get one of the better defensive dmen in this draft. Ideally Skahan could play with Parayko in a few years when he is ready to join the team or he could form an amazing pair with Elick. | ||
50 | - | A true power forward who could become even scarier as he develops. At least a bottom 6 player with the potential for more. | ||
51 | - | Underrated RHD who has a solid defensive game and is developing well offensively. | ||
52 | Noel Fransen | Another really underrated dman who will likely move up draft boards after the WJC. | ||
53 | Marek Vanacker | A really solid 2 way winger who isn't afraid to get physical. If he can put on some more weight he could be a legit option in a teams middle 6. | ||
54 | Kleber has the ideal size and hand combo that Chicago will look for. Him and the Levshunov pick solidify the future right side of Chicago defense. | |||
55 | - | Really high upside RHD, but at the same time has a really low floor. Seems like a pick Trotz would make. | ||
56 | The Blues get a bulldog here. Surin reminds me a lot of Barbashev. He would provide the Blues with a great 3C behind Thomas and Dvorsky. | |||
57 | - | Solid middle 6 center potential. | ||
58 | Good defensive center in the mold of Backlund. | |||
59 | Another player who's better at defense than offense. | |||
60 | A player that really pops when I watch him and I think is underrated. Humphreys is a solid playmaker and jack of all trades type player. His production is concerning though. | |||
61 | I'm really not a fan of Ritchie from what I've seen but a lot of people have him in the first round so the Utah goes BPA | |||
62 | Solid bottom 6 center option in the future. | |||
63 | - | Solid 2 way RHD with upside. | ||
64 | Potential middle 6 center in the future. Needs to add strength and improve his shot. | |||
65 | Ondrej Becher | Seattle has had great success with overagers in the pass and they go with one of the best in this draft. |