SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Realistic offseason but with a fun Marner trade to spice it up lol

Créé par: LAKANDTOR348
Équipe: 2024-25 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 11 avr. 2024
Publié: 14 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The only way I’d trade Marner is if we get a BIG TOP 4 RHD and that’s not a lefty player playing righty (even if they are comfortable with it). I understand he also has a full No-move. I will only consider teams(Extremely hard to guess the teams he wouldn't mind going to) that I think he will accept a trade too. It’s unlikely but I want to have fun with 1 trade and the rest I will try my best to make it realistic as possible. ( I really like that 3rd line as a shutdown pair)Let’s do it!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 250 000 $
32 750 000 $
43 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
21 850 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
ANA
  1. Kämpf, David
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
anyteam he’s willing to go to
2.
TOR
  1. Gourde, Yanni
  2. Larsson, Adam
  3. Wright, Shane
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (SEA)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (SEA)
SEA
  1. Marner, Mitchell
  2. Timmins, Conor
Détails additionnels:
Top 10 protected so if not 2025 then will be a unprotected 1st in 2026. Also, I have no idea what a Marner trade would look like and this is either realistic or not idk. I like the making of this trade because we get a big top 4 dman, a young potential top 6 Centre and a proven top 9 player that can play any forward postion and up and down the lineup. He brings pastiness, grit, knows how to win etc. That just a start of a trade I'd consider and it can be way off in value idk. I just like the players we get in and picks
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (COL)
NSH
  1. Liljegren, Timothy [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Depending on the team if they are in the playoffs then two 2nds or a 2 and 2 3s if they are not in the playoffs then a 2nd and 3rd
whatever team I have acquiring him on here doesn’t mean anything, I am just trying to get the most value.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYR
Logo de TBL
Logo de DAL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de SEA
Logo de COL
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de SEA
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2587 500 000 $83 212 499 $0 $3 062 500 $4 287 501 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
13 250 000 $13 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance3 062 500 $$3M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 500 000 $11 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
935 833 $935 833 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DD
UFA
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 avr. à 17 h 45
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,027
Mentions "j'aime": 22,963
Kinda of a conflict in your title and the contents of the post.. LIke Marner being traded.
NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
14 avr. à 17 h 50
#2
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,920
Mentions "j'aime": 1,263
On hell of an overpay, that's the type of package Matthews or Mackinnon would go for. Wright alone is already a lot for Seattle to give up and with how good he's looked I don't think they're gonna want to move him. Same with the 25'1st which will probably be top 15 again with their roster, Larson and Gourde could go for late 1sts on their own + the two 2nds. Marner on the open market would probably get A+ Prospect + roster player + 1st + 2nd. This is like that times 2

Edit: Everything else looks pretty good though!
natep12 et LAKANDTOR348 a aimé ceci.
14 avr. à 17 h 54
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 88
Mentions "j'aime": 17
Quoting: NucksnOilers
On hell of an overpay, that's the type of package Matthews or Mackinnon would go for. Wright alone is already a lot for Seattle to give up and with how good he's looked I don't think they're gonna want to move him. Same with the 25'1st which will probably be top 15 again with their roster, Larson and Gourde could go for late 1sts on their own + the two 2nds. Marner on the open market would probably get A+ Prospect + roster player + 1st + 2nd. This is like that times 2

Edit: Everything else looks pretty good though!


I get that but Larsson Last year of the deal and gourde. I know he’s still very young, but it doesn’t seem like a lot of people have the most hopes in Wright. I could be completely wrong and probably am I just like the people that we get back in it. and Marner is a top 10 all rounded player. That’s not saying he is a top 10 player though.
14 avr. à 17 h 58
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 88
Mentions "j'aime": 17
Quoting: palhal
Kinda of a conflict in your title and the contents of the post.. LIke Marner being traded.


I’m high asf i’m just completely missing what you are saying.
14 avr. à 18 h 5
#5
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,920
Mentions "j'aime": 1,263
Quoting: LAKANDTOR348
I get that but Larsson Last year of the deal and gourde. I know he’s still very young, but it doesn’t seem like a lot of people have the most hopes in Wright. I could be completely wrong and probably am I just like the people that we get back in it. and Marner is a top 10 all rounded player. That’s not saying he is a top 10 player though.


Top-4 d-men at the deadline go for mid-late 1sts, just look at Walker, Tanev and Hanafin this year, same with Gourde since he's a middle 6 centre, just look at Henrique. Now the people hating on Wright are just the same overreactive idiots who went after Hughes, Laf, Byfield and Slafkovsky when they didn't immediately breakout. In 8 games this year he had 4 goals and has done the same in the AHL, he's looking to be a sure-fire 30 goal- 75 point 2C for the Kraken in the future. It's completely fair to call Marner a top 10 player but he is also just a single player, a hockey team is made up of around 20-22 players. The package Seattle is offering here is essentially one future top line centre, one top-4 d-man, one middle 6 centre, one top-15 pick and two potential other roster players. That would be far and away the biggest package in NHL history, they would also have to sign Marner to a 12.5-14 million dollar extension. Just not worth it for them
14 avr. à 18 h 9
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 88
Mentions "j'aime": 17
Quoting: NucksnOilers
Top-4 d-men at the deadline go for mid-late 1sts, just look at Walker, Tanev and Hanafin this year, same with Gourde since he's a middle 6 centre, just look at Henrique. Now the people hating on Wright are just the same overreactive idiots who went after Hughes, Laf, Byfield and Slafkovsky when they didn't immediately breakout. In 8 games this year he had 4 goals and has done the same in the AHL, he's looking to be a sure-fire 30 goal- 75 point 2C for the Kraken in the future. It's completely fair to call Marner a top 10 player but he is also just a single player, a hockey team is made up of around 20-22 players. The package Seattle is offering here is essentially one future top line centre, one top-4 d-man, one middle 6 centre, one top-15 pick and two potential other roster players. That would be far and away the biggest package in NHL history, they would also have to sign Marner to a 12.5-14 million dollar extension. Just not worth it for them


not saying wright can’t break out. I’m just saying what I’m hearing from the insiders we probably listen too. but truthfully, after where you just explained, it definitely is an overpriced by Seattle. I just like the Players that we get back and where they fit in the lineup
NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage