SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

I mean like why not

Créé par: NucksnOilers
Équipe: 2024-25 Predators de Nashville
Date de création initiale: 10 avr. 2024
Publié: 10 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 350 000 $
21 050 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 250 000 $
79 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Could They Get, Roster Spots
31 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de TBL
Logo de WPG
Logo de NSH
Logo de DAL
Logo de NSH
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
2025
Logo de NSH
Logo de TBL
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de COL
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
2026
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2187 700 000 $86 479 199 $0 $932 500 $1 220 801 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Predators de Nashville
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Predators de Nashville
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 185 000 $3 185 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
797 500 $797 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 857 143 $2 857 143 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Predators de Nashville
9 059 000 $9 059 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Predators de Nashville
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Could They Get, Roster Spots
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Predators de Nashville
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 avr. à 22 h 9
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 5,407
Mentions "j'aime": 3,440
Spending 9.5m on a winger is a terrible decision when our weakest positions are center and RD
11 avr. à 9 h 24
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,359
Mentions "j'aime": 1,873
Wood just transferred colleges so he isnt going to sign a contract this offseason.

As far as Guentzel, I'm not opposed but at that point Trotz would need to figure out a way to turn the surplus wingers like Tomasino into a defensive upgrade. We have so many wing prospects and with Forsberg, Guentzel, and Evangelista really solidifing 3 of the top 6 spots it doesnt leave much room for advancement for the Tomasino, Kemell, L'Heureux, Wood, Fink, Schaefer group. Granted Schaefer and Wood on 3rd line with Parssinen in the future might be good that still leaves 1 spot for 4 wingers to compete over. It's self cannibalizing.
NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 12 h 5
#3
Démarrer sujet
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,912
Mentions "j'aime": 1,259
Quoting: Ennis
Spending 9.5m on a winger is a terrible decision when our weakest positions are center and RD


C is understandable but there's no fixing that this offseason that would have to happen during the draft. Between Carrier and Fabbro the RD core seems pretty strong to me?? The Guentzel trade is more so looking 2-3 years in the future, Nyquist and O'Reilly will either want big time raises or not be at the same level anymore. Guentzel can provide that offensive firepower for Nashville with all their young pieces. They also free up around 10-12 million in cap during that time which provides relief for them
11 avr. à 12 h 13
#4
Démarrer sujet
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,912
Mentions "j'aime": 1,259
Quoting: herzausstein
Wood just transferred colleges so he isnt going to sign a contract this offseason.

As far as Guentzel, I'm not opposed but at that point Trotz would need to figure out a way to turn the surplus wingers like Tomasino into a defensive upgrade. We have so many wing prospects and with Forsberg, Guentzel, and Evangelista really solidifing 3 of the top 6 spots it doesnt leave much room for advancement for the Tomasino, Kemell, L'Heureux, Wood, Fink, Schaefer group. Granted Schaefer and Wood on 3rd line with Parssinen in the future might be good that still leaves 1 spot for 4 wingers to compete over. It's self cannibalizing.


As an Oilers fan Schaefer seems like a bust. I was shocked Nashville took him over Bourgault in the Ekholm trade but here we are, Tomasino, Kemell, L'Heureux and Wood all seem to be good though. I don't know enough about Fink but he seems to be tearing it up in the NCAA so I would slot him in for a middle 6 spot in 2-3 years time. Wood plays C so I would expect him to take that 2/3 C spot rather than a winger spot but I understand why they would want to try him on the wing.

Steps up a top 9 of

Forsberg - Wood - JG
Fink - Novak - Evagelista
L' Heureux - Parssienen - Kemell

Tomasino is the odd man out who can be moved for a d-core upgrade in the future essentially
11 avr. à 12 h 55
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,359
Mentions "j'aime": 1,873
Quoting: NucksnOilers
As an Oilers fan Schaefer seems like a bust. I was shocked Nashville took him over Bourgault in the Ekholm trade but here we are, Tomasino, Kemell, L'Heureux and Wood all seem to be good though. I don't know enough about Fink but he seems to be tearing it up in the NCAA so I would slot him in for a middle 6 spot in 2-3 years time. Wood plays C so I would expect him to take that 2/3 C spot rather than a winger spot but I understand why they would want to try him on the wing.

Steps up a top 9 of

Forsberg - Wood - JG
Fink - Novak - Evagelista
L' Heureux - Parssienen - Kemell

Tomasino is the odd man out who can be moved for a d-core upgrade in the future essentially


Schaefer took a LONG time to get going in the AHL. But he's been about 0.5 PPG over the last 24 games or so. He's looking alot better. Think he will be a decent 3rd line option in the long run. I think we went with him because we decided to trade Jeannot and we wanted that big body, grit, with some offensive flair back into the pipeline.

Only thing that worries me about fink is his size. NCAA tends to have these wingers of smaller stature that can create offense that never translates to the NHL. Though watching some of his highlights, he is a playdriver and not a passenger so he may be able to make the jump just fine
NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 19 h 40
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 5,407
Mentions "j'aime": 3,440
Quoting: NucksnOilers
C is understandable but there's no fixing that this offseason that would have to happen during the draft. Between Carrier and Fabbro the RD core seems pretty strong to me?? The Guentzel trade is more so looking 2-3 years in the future, Nyquist and O'Reilly will either want big time raises or not be at the same level anymore. Guentzel can provide that offensive firepower for Nashville with all their young pieces. They also free up around 10-12 million in cap during that time which provides relief for them


Yeah but Guentzel is primarily a LW, and spending 9.5 on someone to play behind forsberg isn’t wise. We don’t have to spend that much on a center this offseason, but i’d prefer to keep that money free down the road. Guentzel isn’t really a need
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage