SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Flames collect 1st

Créé par: SchlemCat
Publié: 4 avr. à 23 h 14
Plafond salarial: 83 500 000 $
Journées à la saison: 42/192 (22%)
Détermination du registraire central: Cette transaction a rempli les différents critères exigés par le registraire central de la LNH.

Logo de Flames de CalgaryFlames de Calgary

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Andersson, RasmusFlames de CalgaryLNH-995 313 $011---7082735--
Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (Logo de Flames de CalgaryCGY)---010------
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (Logo de Sénateurs d'OttawaOTT)---100------
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial1 534 073 $2546645910
Variation995 313 $-1-1-11-10
Final2 529 386 $ (↑)24 (↓)45 (↓)63 (↓)6 (↑)8 (↓)10-8-27-35

Logo de Sénateurs d'OttawaSénateurs d'Ottawa

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (Logo de Sénateurs d'OttawaOTT)---100------
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Andersson, RasmusFlames de CalgaryLNH-4 550 000 $011---7082735--
Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (Logo de Flames de CalgaryCGY)---010------
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial5 516 667 $2349674512
Variation-4 550 000 $111-110
Final966 667 $ (↓)24 (↑)50 (↑)68 (↑)3 (↓)6 (↑)1282735
5 avr. à 13 h 54
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 8,067
Mentions "j'aime": 3,343
I think Ottawa would do that but Calgary probably wants more for Andersson. Not a whole lot more and no not Brannstrom a player or prospect Calgary has a want/need/use for.
5 avr. à 18 h 59
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,313
Mentions "j'aime": 1,651
rofl rasmus is not worth a top 10 pick, OTT declines
5 avr. à 20 h 49
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,419
Mentions "j'aime": 472
Quoting: athrin
rofl rasmus is not worth a top 10 pick, OTT declines


Actually, it's pretty close to value... I'd say he's worth 9 to 12 choice this year... would not trade for him with a top 8 pick though...
6 avr. à 8 h 55
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,313
Mentions "j'aime": 1,651
Quoting: Element23VM
Actually, it's pretty close to value... I'd say he's worth 9 to 12 choice this year... would not trade for him with a top 8 pick though...


rasmus is worth a pick 15-32 not top 15, hes is not a top end D in the league in the likes of Makar, Hughes, Fox or Dobson
6 avr. à 14 h 46
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,419
Mentions "j'aime": 472
Quoting: athrin
rasmus is worth a pick 15-32 not top 15, hes is not a top end D in the league in the likes of Makar, Hughes, Fox or Dobson


Makar would have cost Chicago their first last year to acquire (Bedard), Hughes, Dobson, and Fox would cost a 1OA this year to get. If you had picks 8,9,10,11, and 12 put together, you could not acquire those guys.

This year, a top 7 pick is like a top 4 pick in most other years, so they're not going anywhere... but if a team believes it's in its competitive window, it will acquire a guy like Andersson if it has like a 9OVR... if it needs a guy like Andersson.

Most relevant trade is Islanders trading for Romanov which cost them 13OVR. Andersson's status is higher than Romanov's right now, on top of his being extremely affordable and with term left.
SchlemCat a aimé ceci.
6 avr. à 18 h 19
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,313
Mentions "j'aime": 1,651
Quoting: Element23VM
Makar would have cost Chicago their first last year to acquire (Bedard), Hughes, Dobson, and Fox would cost a 1OA this year to get. If you had picks 8,9,10,11, and 12 put together, you could not acquire those guys.

This year, a top 7 pick is like a top 4 pick in most other years, so they're not going anywhere... but if a team believes it's in its competitive window, it will acquire a guy like Andersson if it has like a 9OVR... if it needs a guy like Andersson.

Most relevant trade is Islanders trading for Romanov which cost them 13OVR. Andersson's status is higher than Romanov's right now, on top of his being extremely affordable and with term left.


no freaking team is going to give up a top 10 pick for rasmus, what other teams paid for other players has ZERO to do with what a team will give up for rasmus. just because lou was dumb enough to give up 13th for Romanov don't mean a GM will give up a top 10 pick for rasmus.
6 avr. à 19 h 20
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,419
Mentions "j'aime": 472
Quoting: athrin
no freaking team is going to give up a top 10 pick for rasmus, what other teams paid for other players has ZERO to do with what a team will give up for rasmus. just because lou was dumb enough to give up 13th for Romanov don't mean a GM will give up a top 10 pick for rasmus.


Lou's stupid for picking up a 2-3 D with a pick which... you HOPE ONE DAY can get a 2-3 D with? He could have used that pick to draft legendary D like Brandon Gormley, or Jakub Zboril, or Jake Bean...

No, no, I'm sure he needed that pick to draft Frank Nazar, who might one day be a middle six forward who has power play utility, ranking at best top 40 to 50 at his position.

Instead, he gets currently one of the best minute chewing D in the league.
SchlemCat a aimé ceci.
6 avr. à 20 h 35
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,163
Mentions "j'aime": 386
Quoting: Element23VM
Lou's stupid for picking up a 2-3 D with a pick which... you HOPE ONE DAY can get a 2-3 D with? He could have used that pick to draft legendary D like Brandon Gormley, or Jakub Zboril, or Jake Bean...

No, no, I'm sure he needed that pick to draft Frank Nazar, who might one day be a middle six forward who has power play utility, ranking at best top 40 to 50 at his position.

Instead, he gets currently one of the best minute chewing D in the league.

👏👏👏
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage