SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Team USA 2026

Équipe: 2023-24 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 23 mars 2024
Publié: 23 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $219 019 178 $0 $1 850 000 $-135 519 178 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
7 150 000 $7 150 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 475 000 $3 475 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $ (6 725 000 $$7M6 725 000 $$7M)
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $ (4 600 000 $$5M4 600 000 $$5M)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $ (5 500 000 $$6M5 500 000 $$6M)
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $ (3 350 000 $$3M3 350 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $ (5 350 000 $$5M5 350 000 $$5M)
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $ (5 850 000 $$6M5 850 000 $$6M)
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $ (5 850 000 $$6M5 850 000 $$6M)
AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Islanders de New York
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $ (4 850 000 $$5M4 850 000 $$5M)
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $ (1 350 000 $$1M1 350 000 $$1M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $ (6 700 000 $$7M6 700 000 $$7M)
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
897 500 $897 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $ (2 850 000 $$3M2 850 000 $$3M)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $ (8 433 333 $$8M8 433 333 $$8M)
DG
NMC
UFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 mars à 10 h 59
#1
Tank it baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 6,333
Mentions "j'aime": 4,320
Modifié 23 mars à 12 h 38
This Team USA is a Wagon!

Oh how far we've come! 😁

Let's take a time machine back 40 years ago to the 1984 Canada Cup at what the Americans roster looked like...

Forwards

Eddie Olczyk
Brian Lawton
Bryan Trottier
Mark Johnson
Bobby Carpenter
Neal Broten
Bryan Erickson
Joe Mullen
Aaron Broten
Dave Christian
Bob Brooke
Brian Mullen
David A. Jensen

Defensemen

Rod Langway
Mike Ramsey
Chris Chelios
Phil Housley
Gordie Roberts
Mark Fusco
Tom Hirsch

Goalies

Tom Barrasso
Glenn "Chico" Resch

Team USA went 3-2-1 and finished 4th.

They went 3-1-1 in the round robin.

Then were curb stomped by Team Sweden 9-2 in the semi final.

Team USA had previously beaten Team Sweden 7-1 in round robin play.

Head coach was "Badger" Bob Johnson.

One of my favorite Head coaches of all time.

Team Canada won the tournament sweeping Team Sweden 2 games to none in the Final.

The big matchup was Team Canada vs Soviet Union in the semi final.

Canada won that game 3-2 in OT on a shot from Paul Coffey which was deflected by Mike Bossy.

Soviets had previously beaten Team Canada 6-3 in round robin.

Team USA tied Team Canada 4-4 in round robin.

Team USA lost 2-1 to the Soviets also in round robin.

West Germany was in this tournament of 6 teams.

Czechoslovakia was too.

No Finland? 🙄

19 year old Dominik Hasek was Team Czechoslovakia starting goalie.

He wouldn't make his NHL debut until 1990 with Chicago.
23 mars à 13 h 9
#2
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,439
Mentions "j'aime": 11,400
I find it's generally best to have one legit checking center for this level. This is one area where the US team might have an issue compared to other teams. We don't have that Bergeron or Hintz or O'Reilly or Couts or Karlsson, or even a Thomas level guy, who can drop down to the role for the team. Could Miller play that role? I suppose. Is Lowry good enough to hang in a best v best? Or Copp or Compher or Dowd? I dunno, man.

You have Eichel top line and who knows, he might be forced into playing 4th line. One way or another, there needs to be someone who can keep the McKinnons and Drais and Petterssons quieter than usual. Or at least to not let them run wild.
23 mars à 13 h 15
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,565
Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
Quoting: mokumboi
I find it's generally best to have one legit checking center for this level. This is one area where the US team might have an issue compared to other teams. We don't have that Bergeron or Hintz or O'Reilly or Couts or Karlsson, or even a Thomas level guy, who can drop down to the role for the team. Could Miller play that role? I suppose. Is Lowry good enough to hang in a best v best? Or Copp or Compher or Dowd? I dunno, man.

You have Eichel top line and who knows, he might be forced into playing 4th line. One way or another, there needs to be someone who can keep the McKinnons and Drais and Petterssons quieter than usual. Or at least to not let them run wild.


In comes Vincent Trocheck. He’s defensively responsible and capable of playing top minutes with elite players (Panarin every night) and can win faceoffs. He’d be the perfect 4C.
23 mars à 13 h 21
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,923
Mentions "j'aime": 14,597
Quoting: mokumboi
I find it's generally best to have one legit checking center for this level. This is one area where the US team might have an issue compared to other teams. We don't have that Bergeron or Hintz or O'Reilly or Couts or Karlsson, or even a Thomas level guy, who can drop down to the role for the team. Could Miller play that role? I suppose. Is Lowry good enough to hang in a best v best? Or Copp or Compher or Dowd? I dunno, man.

You have Eichel top line and who knows, he might be forced into playing 4th line. One way or another, there needs to be someone who can keep the McKinnons and Drais and Petterssons quieter than usual. Or at least to not let them run wild.


If Andrew copp or jt compher or tanev is on my Olympic team I am renouncing my citizenship

Listen to yourself
23 mars à 14 h 8
#5
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,439
Mentions "j'aime": 11,400
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
If Andrew copp or jt compher or tanev is on my Olympic team I am renouncing my citizenship

Listen to yourself


I didn't say they should be on the team (or mention Tanev). I said there needs to be a proper shutdown C.
23 mars à 14 h 8
#6
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,439
Mentions "j'aime": 11,400
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
In comes Vincent Trocheck. He’s defensively responsible and capable of playing top minutes with elite players (Panarin every night) and can win faceoffs. He’d be the perfect 4C.


But how will he look in two years? I don't know. It may end up being Beniers or somebody like that.
23 mars à 14 h 37
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,565
Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
Quoting: mokumboi
But how will he look in two years? I don't know. It may end up being Beniers or somebody like that.


In 2 years he’s only 32. That’s not old. In 2 years, MacKinnon is 30 and Crosby is 38. You’re being unreasonable.
23 mars à 17 h 8
#8
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,439
Mentions "j'aime": 11,400
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
In 2 years he’s only 32. That’s not old. In 2 years, MacKinnon is 30 and Crosby is 38. You’re being unreasonable.


For some reason, I though he was already across 30. So fine, maybe him. My point remains the same.
23 mars à 18 h 27
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,923
Mentions "j'aime": 14,597
Quoting: mokumboi
For some reason, I though he was already across 30. So fine, maybe him. My point remains the same.


You don't need shut down centers in the Olympics. Just take your best players and go play.

Like you mentioned nic dowd to represent our country to the world.
HOCKEYBOY448 a aimé ceci.
23 mars à 18 h 46
#10
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,439
Mentions "j'aime": 11,400
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
You don't need shut down centers in the Olympics. Just take your best players and go play.

Like you mentioned nic dowd to represent our country to the world.


Best on best Olympic golds so far...

2014 - Canada (Bergeron in the team)
2010 - Ditto and ditto
2006 - Sweden (Zetterberg)
2002 - Canada (Peca)
1998 - Czech Rep. (Straka dropped down the line-up to shine in the role)
27 mars à 1 h 22
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,565
Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
Quoting: mokumboi
Best on best Olympic golds so far...

2014 - Canada (Bergeron in the team)
2010 - Ditto and ditto
2006 - Sweden (Zetterberg)
2002 - Canada (Peca)
1998 - Czech Rep. (Straka dropped down the line-up to shine in the role)


Bergeron and Zetts were still top dogs on their teams. So I wouldn’t necessarily say they were only taken for defensive purposes. That just so happened to be the case with them.
27 mars à 1 h 39
#12
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,439
Mentions "j'aime": 11,400
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
Bergeron and Zetts were still top dogs on their teams. So I wouldn’t necessarily say they were only taken for defensive purposes. That just so happened to be the case with them.


2010 Bergeron was coming off a 52 point season that was 21 points below his career high at that point and had yet earn a single Selke vote in his career. He was on a Canada team with Crosby, Old Joe, Toews and Getzlaf. He was in no way a top dog on that team and was absolutely brought in to center the matchup line. Unquestionably.

He obviously had more steam with a couple Selkes by 2014, but still was on a team with Crosby, Toews, Getzlaf and Tavares (not to mention a ridiculously strong defense stable). So still not a top dog, still the matchup C.

In 2006, Zetterberg had just had his breakout season, but the Sweden team had Forsberg, Sundin and the Sedins, plus leaders like Lidstrom and Alfredsson. Soooo not a top dog by any stretch.
27 mars à 1 h 48
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,565
Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
Quoting: mokumboi
2010 Bergeron was coming off a 52 point season that was 21 points below his career high at that point and had yet earn a single Selke vote in his career. He was on a Canada team with Crosby, Old Joe, Toews and Getzlaf. He was in no way a top dog on that team and was absolutely brought in to center the matchup line. Unquestionably.

He obviously had more steam with a couple Selkes by 2014, but still was on a team with Crosby, Toews, Getzlaf and Tavares (not to mention a ridiculously strong defense stable). So still not a top dog, still the matchup C.

In 2006, Zetterberg had just had his breakout season, but the Sweden team had Forsberg, Sundin and the Sedins, plus leaders like Lidstrom and Alfredsson. Soooo not a top dog by any stretch.


Should’ve been more clear, Zetts was most definitely a top dog on Detroit, same for Bergeron on the Bruins.
27 mars à 2 h 3
#14
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,439
Mentions "j'aime": 11,400
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
Should’ve been more clear, Zetts was most definitely a top dog on Detroit, same for Bergeron on the Bruins.


Okaaaaay, but we're not talking about their NHL teams.

Here are some of the Cs Canada passed over to take Bergeron as the matchup guy:
Stamkos (4th in the league in scoring, top goal scorer, 6th in Hart voting)
Richards (5th in scoring)
Kesler (11th in scoring)
Carter (13th)
Staal (15th)
Weiss, Spezza, Tavares... all with more points and more pub at the time.

Bergeron was the defensive C specialist on that team. This is inarguable. IIRC there was quite a bit of arguments going on about his selection in both 2010 and 2014. It was not a given or something universally accepted.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage