SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bruins next season

Créé par: kscoop
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 21 mars 2024
Publié: 21 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Signed Hanifin and Stephenson from Vegas. Probably not likely as Vegas will keep one of the two I'd think but you never know. Decided to go with Stephenson rather than Lindholm as he is the cheaper option as can bring almost as much to the table as E. Lindholm. Hanifin is a no brainer if he wants to come home. Merkulov and Lysell make the team and if they don't they never will. Signed Lafferty as a depth player that can slot in anywhere in the lineup. Lots of players on this roster can play either center or wing, this is good in case Poitras needs to slide over to RW if he's not ready for a full time role at center.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2825 000 $
87 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 500 000 $
77 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
Transactions
BOS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (DET)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de DET
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2389 500 000 $85 604 167 $50 000 $542 500 $3 895 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
825 000 $825 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 mars à 12 h 10
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 476
Mentions "j'aime": 165
I like Stephenson as a player but it's been awhile since his defensive underlying numbers have even graded out as average. Not sure he's a guy that you can play with Pasta.
21 mars à 12 h 13
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,895
Mentions "j'aime": 1,207
Quoting: dugg133
I like Stephenson as a player but it's been awhile since his defensive underlying numbers have even graded out as average. Not sure he's a guy that you can play with Pasta.


Lindholm fits the system and Sweeney has tried to acquire him from both Calgary and Vancouver. As a collective fan base, I think we are overthinking this.

To me, the question is do we trade Ullmark with the thought process of pursuing both Hanifin and Lindholm OR do we just pursue one of them (with Lindholm being the likely target)

Detroit’s secondary prospects are good enough to where I see any trade with them likely including an existing prospect
21 mars à 12 h 27
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 476
Mentions "j'aime": 165
Quoting: Celtics21
Lindholm fits the system and Sweeney has tried to acquire him from both Calgary and Vancouver. As a collective fan base, I think we are overthinking this.

To me, the question is do we trade Ullmark with the thought process of pursuing both Hanifin and Lindholm OR do we just pursue one of them (with Lindholm being the likely target)

Detroit’s secondary prospects are good enough to where I see any trade with them likely including an existing prospect


The more I look at it the more I think Hanifin is a luxury we can't really afford. McAvoy can put up elite results without a true top pair defenseman next to him, we already know that for a fact. I'm not sure committing another 7+ mil to defense to find him a partner is the right move.

Ideal offseason for me is re-signing Debrusk, signing Lindholm, and then finding a top 4 capable LD that comes in cheaper then Hanifin does. Probably has to come via trade cause I don't see a guy like that available this summer.
21 mars à 12 h 27
#4
Tank it baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 6,386
Mentions "j'aime": 4,349
Wings aren't doing that

That 1st could be middle of first round.
JoeROFLCOPTER a aimé ceci.
21 mars à 12 h 32
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,895
Mentions "j'aime": 1,207
Quoting: SharkTank
Wings aren't doing that

That 1st could be middle of first round.


My expectation is a

2025 first rounder
Or
A 2024 first rounder (later than 20)
Or
A good prospect and a supplemental pick
Or
Keep him for the year
21 mars à 12 h 41
#6
Joe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 7,683
Mentions "j'aime": 5,602
You could a first for Ullmark, but it's not gonna be from a team with two very good goalie prospects.
21 mars à 12 h 51
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,895
Mentions "j'aime": 1,207
Quoting: JoeROFLCOPTER
You could a first for Ullmark, but it's not gonna be from a team with two very good goalie prospects.


Goalie prospects are better off being developed as backups. Period. Even the best prospects look mediocre in their adjustments unless Detroit is resigned to not being a playoff team next year as well,

I like Cossa, but if he’s your starting goaltender … I’d expect significant struggles in year 1. Levi was better prepared than him.

No way do they trade a mid first, but a secondary D prospect like Wallinder and 2024 second likely is a competitive offer for Ullmark who would be a significant upgrade.
21 mars à 12 h 57
#8
Tank it baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 6,386
Mentions "j'aime": 4,349
Modifié 21 mars à 13 h 2
Quoting: Celtics21
Goalie prospects are better off being developed as backups. Period. Even the best prospects look mediocre in their adjustments unless Detroit is resigned to not being a playoff team next year as well,

I like Cossa, but if he’s your starting goaltender … I’d expect significant struggles in year 1. Levi was better prepared than him.

No way do they trade a mid first, but a secondary D prospect like Wallinder and 2024 second likely is a competitive offer for Ullmark who would be a significant upgrade.


For 1 year of Ullmark?

Not bloody likely.

Ullmark may not even want to play in Detroit.

How is Detroit dumping Husso's 4.75 mil?

And who says Detroit is punting next season?

The plan for Cossa is for him to play another season in Grand Rapids.

Backup in Detroit his first season.

Then take over as the starter in 26/27.

Augustine is 19 years old.

Plenty of time for him to develop.
21 mars à 13 h 16
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,895
Mentions "j'aime": 1,207
Quoting: SharkTank
For 1 year of Ullmark?

Not bloody likely.

Ullmark may not even want to play in Detroit.

How is Detroit dumping Husso's 4.75 mil?

And who says Detroit is punting next season?

The plan for Cossa is for him to play another season in Grand Rapids.

Backup in Detroit his first season.

Then take over as the starter in 26/27.

Augustine is 19 years old.

Plenty of time for him to develop.


So continue to get mediocre goaltending because you signed Husso to a poor contract? My perspective is Cossa isn’t ready next year. You trade a second and a prospect like Wallinder for Ullmark, you buy him a year to develop and figure out what’s next.

Of course, you can play Husso and Lyon or Reimer. Husso is bleeping bad.
21 mars à 13 h 21
#10
Tank it baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 6,386
Mentions "j'aime": 4,349
Modifié 21 mars à 13 h 31
Quoting: Celtics21
So continue to get mediocre goaltending because you signed Husso to a poor contract? My perspective is Cossa isn’t ready next year. You trade a second and a prospect like Wallinder for Ullmark, you buy him a year to develop and figure out what’s next.

Of course, you can play Husso and Lyon or Reimer. Husso is bleeping bad.


Husso stinks but each time I propose a goalie trade on here I get ripped.

Apparently trades never happen according to CFACGM fans.

CFACGM fans believe their starters are modern day versions of Roy, Hasek and Brodeur.
21 mars à 13 h 37
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,895
Mentions "j'aime": 1,207
Quoting: SharkTank
Husso stinks but each time I propose a goalie trade on here I get ripped.

Apparently trades never happen according to CFACGM fans.

CFACGM fans believe their starters are modern day versions of Roy, Hasek and Brodeur.


No different than every team thinking that all cheap goalies will become Adin Hill. Teams have to make cap trade offs all the time.

I look at Detroit’s cap situation and think Ullmark fits fairly easily as long as the price is right. I think that price is likely Wallinder and a second (or an equivalent value). Don’t see that as too much for an upgrade.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage