SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Studs and Duds

Créé par: fangm
Équipe: 2024-25 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 15 mars 2024
Publié: 15 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
62 500 000 $
21 350 000 $
82 250 000 $
44 250 000 $
2850 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Karlsson, Erik (2 500 000 $ retained)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $83 455 500 $0 $0 $44 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
13 250 000 $13 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 500 000 $11 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
935 833 $935 833 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 mars à 12 h 19
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,133
Mentions "j'aime": 1,358
You would need to trade for Desharnais's signing rights to give him an 8 year deal, not that I would recommend it.
15 mars à 12 h 21
#2
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,976
Mentions "j'aime": 1,338
I think Dubas would want futures back and not roster players for Karlsson.
15 mars à 12 h 25
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 2,002
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: DangleCat
You would need to trade for Desharnais's signing rights to give him an 8 year deal, not that I would recommend it.


Forgot about that but I'd do 7 anyways.

I know it's an overpay but I'm factoring in:

1. He's French so Leafs won't be his first choice.
2. At every deadline the leafs trade for a guy like him (2022- 2nd+Ritchie for Lybushkin, 2023- 3rd for Schenn, 2024- 3rd+6th for Lybushkin, 3rd+5th for Edm) even if we overpay by $500k-750k it will save us 5x3rds during our competitive period and towards the end of the deal if the window is closing he's the type of D playoff teams overpay for. At worst it gets us a 3rd at best a Charot type deal can net a 1st.

Overall the risk/reward makes sense and I'd rather pay to get this type of player we desperately need at 27 than give the money to Lybushkin or Edm who are in their 30s.
DangleCat a aimé ceci.
15 mars à 12 h 27
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 2,002
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: jfkst1
I think Dubas would want futures back and not roster players for Karlsson.


Depends on how the rest of this season goes. As it stands now they don't have a 1st in 2025 so young roster players makes more sense.
15 mars à 12 h 30
#5
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,976
Mentions "j'aime": 1,338
Quoting: fangm
Depends on how the rest of this season goes. As it stands now they don't have a 1st in 2025 so young roster players makes more sense.


This deal isn't going to help them in the next season. The hole Karlsson leaves will be massive on an already mediocre blue line. He isn't worth his cap hit, but he is still a good RD and probably the best dman on the team. They won't improve the team in the short term by trading him. It would be more about getting Karlsson somewhere competitive and clearing cap space on a rebuilding team.
15 mars à 12 h 33
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,317
Mentions "j'aime": 272
lol no from pit
15 mars à 12 h 54
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,878
Mentions "j'aime": 14,573
Quoting: jfkst1
This deal isn't going to help them in the next season. The hole Karlsson leaves will be massive on an already mediocre blue line. He isn't worth his cap hit, but he is still a good RD and probably the best dman on the team. They won't improve the team in the short term by trading him. It would be more about getting Karlsson somewhere competitive and clearing cap space on a rebuilding team.


He is not the best defensmen on the team, he isn't even the best rhd on the team and the cap space would be very valuable.

Pittsburgh should have never made the trade to get him
15 mars à 13 h 19
#8
Syd Barret
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 996
Mentions "j'aime": 479
Pens can't turn this offer down fast enough lmao. Yikes.
A couple depth/ ahl level pieces. One dman that can't crack the top 4. For the norris winner with major retention. This has to be a troll
15 mars à 13 h 24
#9
Puckhead
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,197
Mentions "j'aime": 338
Hmm I was going to start hacking at each move but then I looked at the lineup and I kind of like it...even though...

I am not and never actually was a fan of Karlsson.
I think Domi just doesn't fit, maybe when Tavares is gone.
What happened to Minten, Marlies?

The whole of what you did is greater than the sum of the parts though, so I commend your GMing!
15 mars à 13 h 51
#10
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,976
Mentions "j'aime": 1,338
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
He is not the best defensmen on the team, he isn't even the best rhd on the team and the cap space would be very valuable.

Pittsburgh should have never made the trade to get him


Letang is well below his peak. Almost no one would take Letang over Karlsson at the same cap hit. Though most would take Letang at his cap hit relative to Karlsson's. Pettersson is excellent defensively, but questionable to rely on for offensive production. Though again, from a cap value perspective, I can see that argument. But this wasn't about cap value, strictly about on ice performance. Dubas was hired under the expectation of trying to get the core into the playoffs. They wouldn't be any better if they had Petry, Rutta, and Granlund for $14m instead of Karlsson for $11.5m. Might help expedite the rebuild by having the 1st round pick though.
15 mars à 15 h 0
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 2,002
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: fil97
lol no from pit


Quoting: jfkst1
This deal isn't going to help them in the next season. The hole Karlsson leaves will be massive on an already mediocre blue line. He isn't worth his cap hit, but he is still a good RD and probably the best dman on the team. They won't improve the team in the short term by trading him. It would be more about getting Karlsson somewhere competitive and clearing cap space on a rebuilding team.


I agree but I think this is a half way measure.

People always forget how young Leafs prospects are because they are so heavily covered.

Robertson is 22, Lili is 24.

Robertson is 5 months older than the best ranked prospect of the three Pit got in the Bunting deal.

Robertson has 19 points in 41 games averaging 11:22/ night. With some real ice time he should be a lock as a 50/60 points player.

Lili's a #2RD when he's on his game. Problem is he is super streaky. Maybe he is able to find his game in a lower pressure environment.

Kampf/Jarnkrok are role players that Dubas loves who fill holes in the penguins bottom 6 (Carter leaving).

I'm not saying this trade makes them a playoff team or that it maximizes their futures. Just that it gives them 4 players who will be in their lineup next year at reasonable cap hits, two of whom will likely also be in the lineup when the next core is playing in 4-6 years from now and those two will be in their prime at that time.
15 mars à 20 h 43
#12
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,976
Mentions "j'aime": 1,338
Quoting: fangm
I agree but I think this is a half way measure.

People always forget how young Leafs prospects are because they are so heavily covered.

Robertson is 22, Lili is 24.

Robertson is 5 months older than the best ranked prospect of the three Pit got in the Bunting deal.

Robertson has 19 points in 41 games averaging 11:22/ night. With some real ice time he should be a lock as a 50/60 points player.

Lili's a #2RD when he's on his game. Problem is he is super streaky. Maybe he is able to find his game in a lower pressure environment.

Kampf/Jarnkrok are role players that Dubas loves who fill holes in the penguins bottom 6 (Carter leaving).

I'm not saying this trade makes them a playoff team or that it maximizes their futures. Just that it gives them 4 players who will be in their lineup next year at reasonable cap hits, two of whom will likely also be in the lineup when the next core is playing in 4-6 years from now and those two will be in their prime at that time.


Best ranked prospect in that deal is Koivunen, not Ponomarev. Koivunen had one of the best seasons ever for a 20 yr old in Liiga and the player Dubas explicitly wanted.
I like Robertson. He has promising underlying numbers. Guaranteeing he will be a legit top 6 forward is overly optimistic. I don't mind Liligren either, but chances are he is better as a 3rd pairing dman.
Dubas can't serve two masters. Either he wants to compete with this core or he needs to rebuild.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage