SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Actual ReTool

Créé par: A_K
Équipe: 2024-25 Blues de St-Louis
Date de création initiale: 11 mars 2024
Publié: 11 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Obviously the difficult part of doing something like this that the buyout is before ensuring you could land free agents. Either way, it would be good for both parties to move on from Krug and I don't see the feasibility of a trade, even at 50% (i.e. paying to dump him on a bad team would get vetoed and good teams can add a PP 3rd pair guy for under 3.25 and 3 yr term).

I think Hanifin ends up in TB and I'm sure there will be teams lining up to sign Roy that are more enticing than STL, but this would be an actual retool vs what I call "Doug's Silent Rebuild".

Ideally, Dvorsky and Dean can take the 2C and 3C spots over the course of the next couple of seasons and provide some impact on their ELCs. Should also have some more defensemen in the pool if they do things right.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
45 000 000 $
78 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de NYR
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de NYI
2025
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
2026
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $83 356 428 $0 $412 500 $4 343 572 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AG, AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
8 125 000 $8 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
8 125 000 $8 125 000 $
AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
835 833 $835 833 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 571 429 $3 571 429 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
852 500 $852 500 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
775 000 $775 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
900 000 $900 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
800 000 $800 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 mars à 12 h 47
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 241
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Roy is a good dman but I don’t see the point in teams paying him more than $4 mil; he’s a #3 dman at best. Ideally the Blues trade Leddy and buy out Krug which wouldn’t hurt as bad as people think. I’d like to think Alexandrov’s time is up. Finding a partner for Parayko and adding 1 or 2 secondary scoring wingers along with moving 1-3 big contracts should be Army’s offseason goals.

(New Player)-Colt55
Perunovich-Faulk
(New Player)-Kessel
Ex. Tucker
11 mars à 12 h 54
#2
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,289
Mentions "j'aime": 11,361
Honestly, I'd rather trade for or offer sheet Broberg than spend all that on Hanifin. Maybe it's just me.


Quoting: JMSTL2019
Roy is a good dman but I don’t see the point in teams paying him more than $4 mil; he’s a #3 dman at best. Ideally the Blues trade Leddy and buy out Krug which wouldn’t hurt as bad as people think. I’d like to think Alexandrov’s time is up. Finding a partner for Parayko and adding 1 or 2 secondary scoring wingers along with moving 1-3 big contracts should be Army’s offseason goals.

(New Player)-Colt55
Perunovich-Faulk
(New Player)-Kessel
Ex. Tucker


Roy is a good 2nd pairing Dman and that contract would be larcenous. The issue is he can probably do better.
A_K a aimé ceci.
11 mars à 13 h 13
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 292
Mentions "j'aime": 111
Iam against buyout. Points wise he is more than decent. Just wait another year and trade him at 50 retention. Better trade both Faulk and krug in same year of their M-NTC. And everybody saying defence is a problem, Iam tired of hearing it. In my opinion offence is a bigger problem check shots stats, and few teams who above blues in standings have worse GA but their GF helped him negate this problem.
11 mars à 13 h 54
#4
Démarrer sujet
Lets Go Blues
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 6,775
Mentions "j'aime": 4,332
Quoting: aktobos71
Iam against buyout. Points wise he is more than decent. Just wait another year and trade him at 50 retention. Better trade both Faulk and krug in same year of their M-NTC. And everybody saying defence is a problem, Iam tired of hearing it. In my opinion offence is a bigger problem check shots stats, and few teams who above blues in standings have worse GA but their GF helped him negate this problem.


I just don't see the trade market for Krug but no doubt trading him at 50% is an easier solution than the lengthy buyout. Maybe after another year is gone and the term is less of an issue, but I'd rather move on ASAP and try to find a better all-around dman to plug into the top4.

Plenty of blame to go around and it is definitely a nuanced topic. Effective defensemen spend less time defending and improve the transition game which can make it easier on forwards to generate more offense. Effective forwards backcheck responsibly and prevent odd man rushes by being responsible on the puck. When the team doesn't play as a five man unit, hard to place the blame on either group. But once you have enough data to look at, I'd say it's the Blues' inability to get out of their zone that causes the most problems. Poor puck decisions, lack of confidence to make the best play, costly turnovers. They spend way too much time in their zone and it ruins a lot of shifts and chances to gain momentum.

The bigger point, though, is that the forward group is already going to change over the next couple of years with the younger guys coming in and hopefully moving some of the veteran guys down the lineup. The defense is going to remain the same mediocre group unless something drastic is done.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage