lol, LA laughs and says no. Ullmark currently has a lower save % than both Kings starters at half the cost, for one season of Ullmark isn't getting you the crown jewels of the Kings rebuild.

I could see LA being in on him...........I'm sorry, but he's much more dependable than Talbot or Big Save Dave, but neither of those 2 players would ever be included in the deal.

Byfield and Clarke are franchise players this trade wouldn't work on a video game on easy mode.

I agree Ullmark would play well in LA, but LA has made Korpisalo, Talbot and Rittich provide their best numbers. LA isn't as desperate at goal as others. Combine this with Ullmark having a 16 team NTC and only a year remaining and you can see that this trade offer is laughable.

no shot the kings do this

franchise players is a stretch.

Blake has literally indicated in several press conferences he is not willing to trade Clarke or Byfield. It's clear this is the core the Kings want to build around.

But it's fine, I think if you believe Byfield and Clarke are fair returns for one year of Ullmark there is no real conversation to have here.

well since you're such a fan of the world literally: if you literally look at the post you quoted you can literally see that i literally said there was no way the kings do this. it is literally a horrible trade concept.

but calling those guys franchise players is absurd. one hasn't even been able to play at an NHL level yet.