SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Skinner

Créé par: ErikGudbranson
Équipe: 2024-25 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 9 mars 2024
Publié: 9 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Accurate/Prorated
LTIR activée: Oui
Journées à la saison: 192
Journées restantes: 192
Saison restante: 100%
Masse salariale projetée avant les jours restants Info-bulle : 61 971 667 $
Transactions
VAN
  1. Skinner, Jeff (1 500 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2026
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1983 500 000 $67 245 001 $0 $587 500 $16 254 999 $
Masse salariale proratée

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
11 600 000 $11 600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 8
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
816 667 $816 667 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
836 667 $836 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance475 000 $$475K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 mars à 15 h 14
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,932
Mentions "j'aime": 14,599
If we are retaining on skinner I want a real asset. Not to pay mikheyev essentially 6.25 million
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
9 mars à 15 h 23
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,364
Mentions "j'aime": 2,143
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
If we are retaining on skinner I want a real asset. Not to pay mikheyev essentially 6.25 million


its not the same version though. He's totally shot. It's either a one off down year, in which case they should just hold onto him, or this is his new norm, and they should do whatever they can to move the contract.
9 mars à 15 h 30
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,364
Mentions "j'aime": 2,143
Have no issue biting the bullet to do this, but skinner would never waive. He chose buffalo cause its in the north east (rejected LA of all places).
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
9 mars à 15 h 36
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,932
Mentions "j'aime": 14,599
Quoting: Stadel
its not the same version though. He's totally shot. It's either a one off down year, in which case they should just hold onto him, or this is his new norm, and they should do whatever they can to move the contract.


Not like this
9 mars à 15 h 39
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,364
Mentions "j'aime": 2,143
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Not like this


"This" is the only way its going to happen though. Think about what the leafs gave up to get rid of one year of marleau. Like the only way you move Skinners full contract without taking anything back is if you give a team savoie or something like that lol.
9 mars à 15 h 50
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,747
Mentions "j'aime": 3,788
Quoting: Stadel
"This" is the only way its going to happen though. Think about what the leafs gave up to get rid of one year of marleau. Like the only way you move Skinners full contract without taking anything back is if you give a team savoie or something like that lol.


It just bc YOU wanna move Skinner,
it doesn’t mean the Sabres do in real life

Any sort of trade like this would be VERY surprising
9 mars à 15 h 50
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,932
Mentions "j'aime": 14,599
Quoting: Stadel
"This" is the only way its going to happen though. Think about what the leafs gave up to get rid of one year of marleau. Like the only way you move Skinners full contract without taking anything back is if you give a team savoie or something like that lol.


We don't have to trade him though. They did. This trade barely saves any money, just suck it up and deal with it until you buy him out
9 mars à 15 h 51
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,364
Mentions "j'aime": 2,143
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
We don't have to trade him though. They did. This trade barely saves any money, just suck it up and deal with it until you buy him out


yeah and thats probably what theyll do. I just meant this being the only path they can take if they were inclined to move on right away (I dont believe that will be the case)
9 mars à 16 h 8
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 126
Why would Canucks want Skinner?
9 mars à 23 h 11
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,352
Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
Modifié 10 mars à 13 h 13
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
If we are retaining on skinner I want a real asset. Not to pay mikheyev essentially 6.25 million
Quoting: Stadel
Have no issue biting the bullet to do this, but skinner would never waive. He chose buffalo cause its in the north east (rejected LA of all places).
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
It just bc YOU wanna move Skinner,
it doesn’t mean the Sabres do in real life
Any sort of trade like this would be VERY surprising
All of these Skinner trades in which either the Sabres include assets or they trade him for less than future considerations (as this one) have no basis in reality.
Hertl was traded for a prospect chosen 32nd in last year's draft and this years first round pick which will be also very late.
Tomas has three more years remaining on his contract than Jeff AND over the last three years Tomas has played in 209 games scoring 65 goals with 162 pts while accumulating a -71 rating.
Jeff is 18 months older but over the past three years has played in 216 games with 88 goals and 185 pts while accumulating a ZERO +/-.
Other than the length of contracts the contracts are essentially identical.
It is unlikely Jeff will be moved due his NTC, but he is far from a cap dump and his return if he accepted a trade should be more commensurate with the Hertl return than this trade.

Well, that is my penny and half for the week.
Fire away, hit me with your best shot!
AntiAnalytics a aimé ceci.
9 mars à 23 h 42
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,747
Mentions "j'aime": 3,788
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
All of these Skinner trades in which either the Sabres include assets or they trade him for less than future considerations (as this one) have no basis in reality.
Hertl was traded for a prospect chosen 32nd in last year's draft and this years first round pick which will be also very late.
Tomas has three more years remaining on his contract than Jeff AND over the last three years Tomas has played in 209 games scoring 65 goals with 162 pts while accumulating a -71 rating.
Jeff is 18 months older but over the past three years has played in 216 games with 88 goals and 185 pts while accumulating a ZERO +/-.
Other than the length of contracts they are essentially identical.
It is unlikely Jeff will be moved due his NTC, but he is far from a cap dump and his return if he accepted a trade should be more commensurate with the Hertl return than this trade.

Well, that is my penny and half for the week.
Fire away, hit me with your best shot!


Here’s the thing with Skinner….
Yes, it’s true he’s overpaid by a couple Mil & his Cap hit is so high that it’ll be hard to find a team that can fit him in
BUT
he’s also still playing well for us & we have plenty of Cap room
So there’s really no reason we’d wanna move him

And if/when we ever do wanna get out of his contract,
it’ll likely be cheaper/easier just to buy him out
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage