SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ottawa Overhaul

Créé par: BiasSensFan
Équipe: 2024-25 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 7 mars 2024
Publié: 7 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 000 000 $
2925 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
11 750 000 $
1925 000 $
1925 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 250 000 $
32 300 000 $
33 400 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Alnefelt, Hugo925 000 $Aucune compensation
Bowers, Shane925 000 $Aucune compensation
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Chychrun, Jakob
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (FLA)
2.
SJS
  1. Forsberg, Anton
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2025 (OTT)
Détails additionnels:
25% retention
3.
OTT
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2025 (CHI)
4.
CGY
  1. Brännström, Erik
  2. Søgaard, Mads
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (OTT)
  4. Choix de 6e ronde en 2025 (OTT)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (OTT)
5.
OTT
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (VAN)
CGY
  1. Norris, Joshua
Détails additionnels:
15% retention
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de OTT
Logo de DAL
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de FLA
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2187 000 000 $82 165 714 $850 000 $600 000 $4 834 286 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 1
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 050 000 $8 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
805 000 $805 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 mars à 9 h 16
#1
Devo's 2nd Mock Draf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 343
Mentions "j'aime": 86
This team is weaker than we were this season... We still have the issue of having 3 big money LD.....
7 mars à 9 h 20
#2
14m in dead cap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,596
Mentions "j'aime": 3,080
I'd MUCH rather keep Brodin. Pass.
7 mars à 12 h 38
#3
Démarrer sujet
Trade Critic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 65
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: Riddick19
This team is weaker than we were this season... We still have the issue of having 3 big money LD.....


I disagree, we make the goaltending better 10 fold, and Brodin is a type of player we need. Pairing him with Sanderson works perfectly, as one is defensive and the other isn't. We also get a better 4C, and in my opinion 4th line is better, along with the 3rd. The 2nd line is a slight downgrade, but is more balanced. And the LHD point is fair, but Sanderson has played right before, and I don't see why he couldn't adjust and pair with Brodin.
9 mars à 0 h 43
#4
Devo's 2nd Mock Draf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 343
Mentions "j'aime": 86
Quoting: BiasSensFan
I disagree, we make the goaltending better 10 fold, and Brodin is a type of player we need. Pairing him with Sanderson works perfectly, as one is defensive and the other isn't. We also get a better 4C, and in my opinion 4th line is better, along with the 3rd. The 2nd line is a slight downgrade, but is more balanced. And the LHD point is fair, but Sanderson has played right before, and I don't see why he couldn't adjust and pair with Brodin.


Sanderson isn't an offensive defenseman....He's more of a defensive guy. Doesn't think the game offensively all that well. Defensively though he's great with his positioning and being able to use his feet. Brodin doesn't help our PP at all which needs to improve if we're to get better. Vegas (Pietrangelo), Col (Makar), TB (Hedman/Sergachev), Pit (Letang)..... See the pattern? You need a go-to offensive defenseman. Sanderson maxes out at 50 points. As it is we don't really have a top end offensive defenseman. Just outside of Zub we don't really have any good defenseman defensively either....
18 mars à 8 h 22
#5
Démarrer sujet
Trade Critic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 65
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: Riddick19
Sanderson isn't an offensive defenseman....He's more of a defensive guy. Doesn't think the game offensively all that well. Defensively though he's great with his positioning and being able to use his feet. Brodin doesn't help our PP at all which needs to improve if we're to get better. Vegas (Pietrangelo), Col (Makar), TB (Hedman/Sergachev), Pit (Letang)..... See the pattern? You need a go-to offensive defenseman. Sanderson maxes out at 50 points. As it is we don't really have a top end offensive defenseman. Just outside of Zub we don't really have any good defenseman defensively either....


Actually that does make sense, but I do really like what Sanderson brings offensively. I think we can still use Chabot to quarterback the power play, but I think what Brodin brings is stabilazies our defense 5 on 5 and on the PK which hasn't been great at times. Sanderson is what i'd tier as a 2 way defender, but I do, like I said, think he brings some good offense as well. I think using Chabot less 5 on 5 and more for the power play could be a good move, if we where to bring in a more defensive defender this off season. However I do really like some of the points you make.
Riddick19 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage