SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

No deals made

Créé par: Celtics21
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 3 mars 2024
Publié: 3 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Sweeney makes the decision to not add short timers and the cost to add big time players doesnt pen out. He decides to fill the roster with a select few youngsters to prepare them for next year and keep his one year guys to maintain the push to the playoffs


Extensions for DeBrusk, Swayman, Wotherspoon, and Heinen announced after deadline
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $83 496 667 $4 500 000 $0 $3 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 475 000 $3 475 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 mars à 14 h 15
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,833
Mentions "j'aime": 1,186
Give both Lohrei and Lysell an extended run. Let Poitras stay with the team and see what happens with playoff hockey. Invite Bergeron to sit up in the room with the other black aces as a teaching moment at him games
3 mars à 14 h 25
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 476
Mentions "j'aime": 165
waive forbort and bring Beecher back up too. No one will claim him and you can bring him back up as insurance for the playoffs once the cap turns off. I'd give Regula a chance to win that 3RHD spot too.
Celtics21 a aimé ceci.
3 mars à 14 h 27
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,584
Mentions "j'aime": 5,456
They'll probably at least add some depth. Curious to see how they do it with minimal cap space which is one the reasons Forbort shouldn't be on the roster at 3pm Friday whether it is via waivers or trade.

Agreed for Lysell. Lohrei has had extended looks twice and it didn't go well. He's been better this time but is still making way too many mistakes defensively. I would suggest a 3rd-pair sheltered role and see. Otherwise, back to Providence.
3 mars à 14 h 29
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 476
Mentions "j'aime": 165
Quoting: bhavikp27
They'll probably at least add some depth. Curious to see how they do it with minimal cap space which is one the reasons Forbort shouldn't be on the roster at 3pm Friday whether it is via waivers or trade.

Agreed for Lysell. Lohrei has had extended looks twice and it didn't go well. He's been better this time but is still making way too many mistakes defensively. I would suggest a 3rd-pair sheltered role and see. Otherwise, back to Providence.


Agreed on Lohrei. He's NHL ready, but not top 4 ready IMO. Needs to be playing the minutes Shattenkirk is right now. Extremely easy competition with a lot of ozone starts.
3 mars à 14 h 36
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,833
Mentions "j'aime": 1,186
Quoting: dugg133
Agreed on Lohrei. He's NHL ready, but not top 4 ready IMO. Needs to be playing the minutes Shattenkirk is right now. Extremely easy competition with a lot of ozone starts.


I almost did that in my view. Regula, IMO, deserves a shot to play. He’s a poor man’s Carlo with regards to his size and defensive soundness. You can play Grz with McAvoy.
3 mars à 14 h 51
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 476
Mentions "j'aime": 165
Quoting: Celtics21
I almost did that in my view. Regula, IMO, deserves a shot to play. He’s a poor man’s Carlo with regards to his size and defensive soundness. You can play Grz with McAvoy.


if it's possible, I still try and flip Lohrei as part of a package for Hanifin. I'm high on Lohrei, and the flashes of his talent are really bright, but he's a work in progress and this team needs top 4 help now. Try running a defense that's something like this:

Lindholm-McAvoy
Hanifin-Carlo
Gryz-Regula

Gryz can still be an effective player IMO, just needs easier minutes. That top 4 will take all the hard minutes every game.
3 mars à 14 h 58
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,833
Mentions "j'aime": 1,186
Quoting: dugg133
if it's possible, I still try and flip Lohrei as part of a package for Hanifin. I'm high on Lohrei, and the flashes of his talent are really bright, but he's a work in progress and this team needs top 4 help now. Try running a defense that's something like this:

Lindholm-McAvoy
Hanifin-Carlo
Gryz-Regula

Gryz can still be an effective player IMO, just needs easier minutes. That top 4 will take all the hard minutes every game.


I just don’t see the difference between Hanifin and Skjei or Forsling as worth Lohrei and a first. In reality, Skjei is a better fit regardless of the story of Hanifin coming home. I could see Forsling, Stamkos, Sjkei, Lindholm, or Hanifin being available at July 1st. Some of those are likely to be available

I’d be open to DeBrusk, Lohrei, and Merkulov for Hanifin. Throw in Forbort at 50 percent retention to remove any financial obligation. It would require Calgary believing they could resign DeBrusk, which I think is a reasonable bet.
3 mars à 15 h 16
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,584
Mentions "j'aime": 5,456
Quoting: Celtics21
I just don’t see the difference between Hanifin and Skjei or Forsling as worth Lohrei and a first. In reality, Skjei is a better fit regardless of the story of Hanifin coming home. I could see Forsling, Stamkos, Sjkei, Lindholm, or Hanifin being available at July 1st. Some of those are likely to be available

I’d be open to DeBrusk, Lohrei, and Merkulov for Hanifin. Throw in Forbort at 50 percent retention to remove any financial obligation. It would require Calgary believing they could resign DeBrusk, which I think is a reasonable bet.


Skjei has been inconsistent, will be a 30yo and is a great candidate to get a regrettable contract (for the team). Hanifin is a 3 years younger and has played well in a top pair role which Skjei has never done. Lindholm *should* remain a top4 guy, but a possible regression is something to keep in mind which is why having an actual top pair left D is safer. Or opt for a decent bottom-4 D on a short-term contract and it's easier to replace him if he regresses.
3 mars à 15 h 21
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,833
Mentions "j'aime": 1,186
Quoting: bhavikp27
Skjei has been inconsistent, will be a 30yo and is a great candidate to get a regrettable contract (for the team). Hanifin is a 3 years younger and has played well in a top pair role which Skjei has never done. Lindholm *should* remain a top4 guy, but a possible regression is something to keep in mind which is why having an actual top pair left D is safer. Or opt for a decent bottom-4 D on a short-term contract and it's easier to replace him if he regresses.


Lots of options and I’d argue Skjei is significantly better defensively than Hanifin (frankly it isn’t close) and would likely require a contract that is 3 years less, so age is less of an issue. Lohrei and Skjei over Hanifin is not a no brainer either way
3 mars à 15 h 21
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 476
Mentions "j'aime": 165
Quoting: Celtics21
I just don’t see the difference between Hanifin and Skjei or Forsling as worth Lohrei and a first. In reality, Skjei is a better fit regardless of the story of Hanifin coming home. I could see Forsling, Stamkos, Sjkei, Lindholm, or Hanifin being available at July 1st. Some of those are likely to be available

I’d be open to DeBrusk, Lohrei, and Merkulov for Hanifin. Throw in Forbort at 50 percent retention to remove any financial obligation. It would require Calgary believing they could resign DeBrusk, which I think is a reasonable bet.


I think of all those guys you listed Hanifin is the youngest and the best player. Maybe he gets to UFA, maybe not. Personally I don't take that chance and just go get him now. I think you can recoup a first this summer by trading Ullmark to a goalie needy team, so I'm really not too worried about that.
3 mars à 15 h 25
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,833
Mentions "j'aime": 1,186
Quoting: dugg133
I think of all those guys you listed Hanifin is the youngest and the best player. Maybe he gets to UFA, maybe not. Personally I don't take that chance and just go get him now. I think you can recoup a first this summer by trading Ullmark to a goalie needy team, so I'm really not too worried about that.


Is he? I think he’s the best offensive player and he is younger, but if they trade him to Florida … I’d rather have Forsling and the foregone trade package than Hanifin. I believe Forsling is better than him even if the narrative isn’t the same.

I won’t be upset if they acquire Hanifin, but don’t see him as a no brainer at all.
3 mars à 15 h 32
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 476
Mentions "j'aime": 165
Quoting: Celtics21
Is he? I think he’s the best offensive player and he is younger, but if they trade him to Florida … I’d rather have Forsling and the foregone trade package than Hanifin. I believe Forsling is better than him even if the narrative isn’t the same.

I won’t be upset if they acquire Hanifin, but don’t see him as a no brainer at all.


I mean Hanifin also plays against like 90ish percentile quality of competition on under 50% ozone starts for the Flames. He's a legit 2-way difference making defenseman that we could put next to McAvoy on the top pair, or have his carry the 2nd pair with Carlo so Lindholm and Mac can play together. If there's any truth to the idea that he'd be willing to sign here, I think he's about as close to a no brainer as you can get.
3 mars à 15 h 38
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,833
Mentions "j'aime": 1,186
Quoting: dugg133
I mean Hanifin also plays against like 90ish percentile quality of competition on under 50% ozone starts for the Flames. He's a legit 2-way difference making defenseman that we could put next to McAvoy on the top pair, or have his carry the 2nd pair with Carlo so Lindholm and Mac can play together. If there's any truth to the idea that he'd be willing to sign here, I think he's about as close to a no brainer as you can get.


Hes in the 42nd percentile in Defensive Effiency rating, which doesn’t suggest a great two way defenseman. Hes a very good offensive defenseman, which you take along with his defense.

I love Hanifin, but I think he is being overrated a bit in these discussions. Hes a better overall player than Carlo and he would be really interesting paired with Carlo. I’m not minimizing him at all. Just don’t see the great differentiation when you consider the price to pay
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage