SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Selling But Adding

Créé par: mmarchman
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 2 mars 2024
Publié: 2 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Accurate/Prorated
LTIR activée: Oui
Journées à la saison: 192
Journées restantes: 47
Saison restante: 24%
Masse salariale projetée avant les jours restants Info-bulle : 84 697 462 $
Description
Bruins need to move Ullmark to give Swayman the net for good. Bussi is ready to make the next step up to the NHL. Moving Ullmark now capitalizes on the Kings goaltending issues, and Rob Blake's need to make a deep run in the playoffs, while also creating '24 cap space. Boston can't throw away this season. These moves are twofold. The Ullmark trade creates cap flexibility for this season and '25, while the other trades bring in controllable pieces for the future.
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Dvorak, Jakub
  2. Lizotte, Blake
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (LAK)
LAK
  1. Brown, Patrick
  2. Ullmark, Linus
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
Ullmark through SJ. SJ retains 50% salary in exchange for the Bruins '25 5th and Patrick Brown.
2.
ANA
  1. Beecher, John
  2. Brunet, Frédéric
  3. Forbort, Derek
Détails additionnels:
Anaheim frees up cap space in '25 and '26 by moving Gudas and taking Forbert's expiring contract back.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de LAK
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $81 508 334 $4 500 000 $0 $1 991 666 $
Masse salariale proratée

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $1 499 349 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $1 285 156 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $2 753 906 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $979 167 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $1 162 760 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $489 583 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $563 021 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 675 000 $410 026 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $244 792 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $192 773 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
425 000 $104 036 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $189 714 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $189 714 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $189 714 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $902 669 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $2 325 521 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 475 000 $850 651 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $226 432 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $1 003 646 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $189 714 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $979 167 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $257 031 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $189 714 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $1 591 146 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $244 792 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $212 969 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 mars à 20 h 31
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,746
Mentions "j'aime": 1,779
lol Gudas is not cap that needs moving at all. He’s hands down our best RD and is not available

You also have him on the wrong side. You can trade for Fowler if you want a veteran LD with term
GeneralLandro et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 mars à 20 h 33
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,550
Mentions "j'aime": 11,936
Hilarious you think we want to ‘get rid’ of Gudas’s contract man

We love that dude
Jded et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 mars à 21 h 18
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,724
Mentions "j'aime": 535
This is terrible for BOS.

Should wait until the offseason to move Ullmark, plus that return is pretty underwhelming anyway. ANA is not moving Gudas.
2 mars à 22 h 46
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,481
Mentions "j'aime": 25,380
Welcome to CapFriendly. Sometimes, it's not too friendly.

Your geography is a little off. Los Angeles is the SoCal team that needs to "free up cap space in '25 and '26," not Anaheim, who will have more than $34 million in cap space going into the 2024-2025 season without anyone expensive to re-sign. And Radko is a coaches favorite, a team favorite and a fan favorite as well as being the only NHL-qualified RhD we currently have under contract for next season; Derek Forbort would be a useless mouth with Fowler, LaCombe, Minyukov and Zellweger on the left.
4 mars à 15 h 24
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 5
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Jded
lol Gudas is not cap that needs moving at all. He’s hands down our best RD and is not available

You also have him on the wrong side. You can trade for Fowler if you want a veteran LD with term


The best defenseman on the arguably the league's worst team isnt all that noteworthy. Anaheim is not going to compete in the next year or two, why not free up space and go after someone like Hanifin instead? The RD/LD issue was definitely an oversight...It happens. My fault.
4 mars à 15 h 28
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 5
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Welcome to CapFriendly. Sometimes, it's not too friendly.

Your geography is a little off. Los Angeles is the SoCal team that needs to "free up cap space in '25 and '26," not Anaheim, who will have more than $34 million in cap space going into the 2024-2025 season without anyone expensive to re-sign. And Radko is a coaches favorite, a team favorite and a fan favorite as well as being the only NHL-qualified RhD we currently have under contract for next season; Derek Forbort would be a useless mouth with Fowler, LaCombe, Minyukov and Zellweger on the left.


Forbert wouldn't go there to be a piece moving forward. Its an expiring contract, which has value. There may even be another team interested in adding him for a mid-late pick. Anaheim isn't competitive and likely wont be in next year and half. Move the guy for some pieces that are younger and could play down the line or be traded to a team for another player.
4 mars à 15 h 31
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 5
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: KennyBoi
This is terrible for BOS.

Should wait until the offseason to move Ullmark, plus that return is pretty underwhelming anyway. ANA is not moving Gudas.


A top D prospect, middle 6 RFA center and a second is likely the best Boston will do now or in the offseason. You aren't getting more for a 30 year old goalie @ $5 with one year left. Anaheim should be listening to offers on anyone based on their consistently poor play.
4 mars à 15 h 32
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 5
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Hilarious you think we want to ‘get rid’ of Gudas’s contract man

We love that dude


And Calgary loved Tanev. Poor play forces GM's to trade beloved players.
4 mars à 15 h 32
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,481
Mentions "j'aime": 25,380
Quoting: mmarchman
Forbert wouldn't go there to be a piece moving forward. Its an expiring contract, which has value. There may even be another team interested in adding him for a mid-late pick. Anaheim isn't competitive and likely wont be in next year and half. Move the guy for some pieces that are younger and could play down the line or be traded to a team for another player.

How in the world is an expiring contract at a position where there isn't a roster slot a "value" to Anaheim?!? And if there's another team that "may" be "interested in adding him for a mid-late pick," then you can go find that team yourself.
4 mars à 15 h 33
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 47
Mentions "j'aime": 8
What a WIN for LA, we say yes LMAO.
4 mars à 15 h 35
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,550
Mentions "j'aime": 11,936
Quoting: mmarchman
And Calgary loved Tanev. Poor play forces GM's to trade beloved players.


There is absolutely no reason for us to trade Gudas laugh laugh laugh

Verbeek has also said he isn’t trading him so we are all good
4 mars à 15 h 40
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,746
Mentions "j'aime": 1,779
Modifié 4 mars à 15 h 48
Quoting: mmarchman
The best defenseman on the arguably the league's worst team isnt all that noteworthy. Anaheim is not going to compete in the next year or two, why not free up space and go after someone like Hanifin instead? The RD/LD issue was definitely an oversight...It happens. My fault.
.

Performance
Ahh the classic “I want to trade for this guy, but he’s not actually very good argument”. He’s nearly even in corsi and fenwick despite playing for ANA and starting over 60% of shifts in the D zone. He blocks shots like crazy, delivers a ton of hits, and can rip it over 100mph. He plays great hockey for us and we need more like him. I don’t blame you for not watching ANA, we suck and it’s hard to watch even as a fan. But Gudas has absolutely been an exception to that.

ANA needs him
The fact that we won’t compete for the cup in the next 2 years doesn’t mean you trade away every player that will expire before then at the first chance you get. If so, we’d have like 9 guys left on our roster and nobody to show them the ropes.
It isn’t chel. Veterans help develop young talent on the ice (Gudas has been paired with a rookie LD all year long), in the locker room, and outside the rink. In fact im all for adding another vet RD addition to keep mentoring our young LD. As a Bruins fan you guys know better than most. The winning culture your vets have set the tone for is insane

Other FAs:
The Ducks aren’t cap constrained at all. Gudas isn’t stopping us from signing anyone, and like I said he’s our only RD next year, so he also isn’t an obstacle in the lineup either. Hanifin is another LD, so not of interest. But I’d love to see us go for Pesce this offseason, which we can do while keeping Gudas without any issue. Even with Gudas, we should be targeting a player like him in FA, without him we just open up another hole to fill

This return isn’t even mildly interesting:
That title speaks for itself. We want/need none of this. 2 players at our deepest position so they’ll never see the ice and a 4C which we have 2 of already.. for our best Dman..

I’ve made many a bad trade offer on this platform as well. It’s part of the fun. Just sharing feedback. This makes absolutely zero sense for ANA. Good luck to your Bruins
4 mars à 15 h 42
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,746
Mentions "j'aime": 1,779
Quoting: mmarchman
And Calgary loved Tanev. Poor play forces GM's to trade beloved players.


Small difference.. Notice how they waited until the last year of his deal? Not months after they signed him to a multi-year contract to fill a desperate need?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage