SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Depth players 2

Créé par: Redmile04
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 2 mars 2024
Publié: 2 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CAR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. Howard, Isaac [Liste de réserve]
  2. Perbix, Nick
  3. Thompson, Jack
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (TBL)
TBL
  1. Hanifin, Noah
Détails additionnels:
Retained 2 475 000
3.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
Logo de DAL
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de TBL
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2783 500 000 $79 799 166 $0 $1 145 000 $3 700 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 mars à 15 h 30
#1
Miss YA Killer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 3,946
Mentions "j'aime": 1,482
Only if Julien Brisebois is suffering Brain Damage
2 mars à 15 h 32
#2
Démarrer sujet
KippertheGoat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
Only if Julien Brisebois is suffering Brain Damage


Who would you suggest? If brisebois insist that he wants Hanifin.
2 mars à 15 h 32
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,559
Mentions "j'aime": 18,878
The GMs previously agreed upon:
Holtz = Markstrom with ~$2m retained

Now we have got:
Holtz, Bahl, Vanecek, 1st
But no retention?

If it costs so much to dump Vanecek, we’d just keep him. Otherwise, it’s hard to see how the return has increased?
dgibb10 a aimé ceci.
2 mars à 15 h 34
#4
Wooooooo!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 7
Mentions "j'aime": 2
As a Canes fan, I reject this. However it’s not a bad trade just not for me.
2 mars à 15 h 36
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2024
Messages: 11
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Holtz and Markstrom we know about. You're assuming the other pieces. You can't know that.
2 mars à 15 h 38
#6
Démarrer sujet
KippertheGoat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: NHLfan10506
The GMs previously agreed upon:
Holtz = Markstrom with ~$2m retained

Now we have got:
Holtz, Bahl, Vanecek, 1st
But no retention?

If it costs so much to dump Vanecek, we’d just keep him. Otherwise, it’s hard to see how the return has increased?


Wasn't there article that said that NJ? Is willing to remove the retention? So I'm not sure what they would replace it with or remove
2 mars à 15 h 38
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,559
Mentions "j'aime": 18,878
Quoting: SlashHammer
Holtz and Markstrom we know about. You're assuming the other pieces. You can't know that.


There were no other pieces.
dgibb10 a aimé ceci.
2 mars à 15 h 38
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2024
Messages: 11
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: NHLfan10506
The GMs previously agreed upon:
Holtz = Markstrom with ~$2m retained

Now we have got:
Holtz, Bahl, Vanecek, 1st
But no retention?

If it costs so much to dump Vanecek, we’d just keep him. Otherwise, it’s hard to see how the return has increased?


Quoting: NHLfan10506
The GMs previously agreed upon:
Holtz = Markstrom with ~$2m retained

Now we have got:
Holtz, Bahl, Vanecek, 1st
But no retention?

If it costs so much to dump Vanecek, we’d just keep him. Otherwise, it’s hard to see how the return has increased?
NHLfan10506 a aimé ceci.
2 mars à 15 h 39
#9
Miss YA Killer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 3,946
Mentions "j'aime": 1,482
Quoting: Redmile04
Who would you suggest? If brisebois insist that he wants Hanifin.


1 TB doesn't need the retention
2 Howard and Gauthier should 100% be out of play.
Honestly if he does this it tells me Hedman is either Traded this off season or his final year is next.
Id probably max out at switching Howard with Duke an d Thompson with Finley
Redmile04 a aimé ceci.
2 mars à 15 h 39
#10
Démarrer sujet
KippertheGoat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: SlashHammer
Holtz and Markstrom we know about. You're assuming the other pieces. You can't know that.


Well who would you add? Seamus, Graham?
2 mars à 15 h 40
#11
R.I.P Yotes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 110
I’d be fine with everything but adding depth. We’re re tooling not gearing up for a playoff run so kinda seems unnecessary.

Just wait till NJ fans see their lord and saviour Alexander Holtz is in the Marky deal. Automatic no from them.

Bahl doesn’t need to be in there imo. Neither does Vancek, just defeats the purpose of the trade by still taking up Wolfs NHL spot. Just retain 1-2 mill on Marky instead.
2 mars à 15 h 40
#12
Démarrer sujet
KippertheGoat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
1 TB doesn't need the retention
2 Howard and Gauthier should 100% be out of play.
Honestly if he does this it tells me Hedman is either Traded this off season or his final year is next.
Id probably max out at switching Howard with Duke an d Thompson with Finley


Thanks for your reply
Boltsradynasty a aimé ceci.
2 mars à 15 h 41
#13
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,821
Mentions "j'aime": 3,418
Quoting: Redmile04
Wasn't there article that said that NJ? Is willing to remove the retention? So I'm not sure what they would replace it with or remove


The article said NJD was willing to do a trade without retention, not that they were willing to give what they were willing to pay for retained markstrom for unretained markstrom.

Before: NJD unwilling to take on markstrom unless he came with retention
Now: NJD willing to take on markstrom even unretained.
2 mars à 15 h 41
#14
Démarrer sujet
KippertheGoat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: MyTeamsSuck
I’d be fine with everything but adding depth. We’re re tooling not gearing up for a playoff run so kinda seems unnecessary.

Just wait till NJ fans see their lord and saviour Alexander Holtz is in the Marky deal. Automatic no from them.

Bahl doesn’t need to be in there imo. Neither does Vancek, just defeats the purpose of the trade by still taking up Wolfs NHL spot. Just retain 1-2 mill on Marky instead.


I don't know if we can make this work
2 mars à 15 h 41
#15
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,821
Mentions "j'aime": 3,418
Quoting: Redmile04
Well who would you add? Seamus, Graham?


If Seamus Casey was involved in the trade it would have leaked
2 mars à 15 h 42
#16
Démarrer sujet
KippertheGoat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: dgibb10
The article said NJD was willing to do a trade without retention, not that they were willing to give what they were willing to pay for retained markstrom for unretained markstrom.

Before: NJD unwilling to take on markstrom unless he came with retention
Now: NJD willing to take on markstrom even unretained.


So can you refresh my mind in what offer Was again
2 mars à 15 h 42
#17
R.I.P Yotes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 110
Quoting: Redmile04
I don't know if we can make this work


There’s a reason it hasn’t been done 😂

Perfect trade partners that both overvalue their pieces.
2 mars à 15 h 43
#18
Miss YA Killer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 3,946
Mentions "j'aime": 1,482
Quoting: Redmile04
Thanks for your reply


I'm not as high on going after Hanifin as some here . Would he be a nice get ? Absolutely! Can t. Really afford him? Absolutely not.
You're welcome no problem.
2 mars à 15 h 43
#19
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,821
Mentions "j'aime": 3,418
Quoting: Redmile04
So can you refresh my mind in what offer Was again


Nothing 100% confirmed.

Holtz for Markstrom with retention is the reported deal that almost went through.
2 mars à 15 h 44
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,559
Mentions "j'aime": 18,878
Quoting: Redmile04
Wasn't there article that said that NJ? Is willing to remove the retention? So I'm not sure what they would replace it with or remove


Pierre LeBrun put out a story yesterday that Devils GM had recently indicated to Calgary that he would do a trade without retention. (Unclear if this came before or after Markstrom’s comments yesterday).

While retention appeared to be the hang up early on, when this story first came out, a number of people have said since it was not the retention but the cost of the retention.

Later, it came out the the deal they agreed on included $2m of retention (as recently as Friedman saying last night on NHL network around 7pm Eastern).

I suspect the hang-up was more about Fitzy’s bid for Hanifin as well…until Hanifin moves, he wants combined package. (My speculation)
dgibb10 a aimé ceci.
2 mars à 15 h 46
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,559
Mentions "j'aime": 18,878
Quoting: MyTeamsSuck
I’d be fine with everything but adding depth. We’re re tooling not gearing up for a playoff run so kinda seems unnecessary.

Just wait till NJ fans see their lord and saviour Alexander Holtz is in the Marky deal. Automatic no from them.

Bahl doesn’t need to be in there imo. Neither does Vancek, just defeats the purpose of the trade by still taking up Wolfs NHL spot. Just retain 1-2 mill on Marky instead.


Devils fans do not want to see Holtz in this deal, but have accepted it since it’s been reported in a number of spots.
2 mars à 15 h 47
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,559
Mentions "j'aime": 18,878
Quoting: dgibb10
If Seamus Casey was involved in the trade it would have leaked


Seamus too famous for Flame-es
2 mars à 15 h 51
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,559
Mentions "j'aime": 18,878
Quoting: SlashHammer


Welcome to CapFriendly, SlashHammer!

It appears you responded without a message.

If you want to respond, hit the ‘quote’ button under the text and type your message in the box at the bottom.
2 mars à 15 h 55
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 6,973
Mentions "j'aime": 2,019
Uh no
2 mars à 16 h 11
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2024
Messages: 11
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: Redmile04
Well who would you add? Seamus, Graham?


Holtz, Seamus, Vanacek 1st, 2mil retention.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage