SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Not Debrusk

Créé par: cody_tugak
Équipe: 2023-24 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 2 mars 2024
Publié: 2 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2026
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $83 004 125 $850 000 $4 400 000 $495 875 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance325 000 $$325K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 225 000 $$3M)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
874 125 $874 125 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 mars à 10 h 33
#1
BostonBoy17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 633
Mentions "j'aime": 193
Tough call. Holloway for Merkulov, Foegele and a 1st for Frederic is fair value but it seems like this is a trade that puts the Bruins at the disadvantage of having to resign both guys this offseason which eats into their big pool of cap without really improving the team. But maybe.
cody_tugak a aimé ceci.
2 mars à 10 h 54
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,832
Mentions "j'aime": 8,854
Pass

You’d been better off going for Jake.

2nd/Broberg for Jake maybe. We can talk retention also
2 mars à 11 h 18
#3
Démarrer sujet
Mr.T 17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,791
Mentions "j'aime": 338
Quoting: Gofnut999
Pass

You’d been better off going for Jake.

2nd/Broberg for Jake maybe. We can talk retention also


Why doesn't anyone know on this site that when it's a players final year of his contract and he's already played half the season with his previous team, retention is already in play, and yes I didn't put it in for Foegs but I'll admit that was my mistake and can easily be fixed, player was already paid half his salary for that year and will not be paid a full final year of his contract, lol
2 mars à 11 h 20
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,086
Mentions "j'aime": 7,771
Frederic in not an upgrade on Foegele, and Merkulov isn't an upgrade on Holloway. What is the 1st for?
cody_tugak a aimé ceci.
2 mars à 11 h 22
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,086
Mentions "j'aime": 7,771
Two roster players for one. That makes your bottom-6 much weaker. Dumb move from Edmonton's perspective.
2 mars à 11 h 22
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,832
Mentions "j'aime": 8,854
Quoting: cody_tugak
Why doesn't anyone know on this site that when it's a players final year of his contract and he's already played half the season with his previous team, retention is already in play, and yes I didn't put it in for Foegs but I'll admit that was my mistake and can easily be fixed, player was already paid half his salary for that year and will not be paid a full final year of his contract, lol


No i meant retention on Jake, not interested at all in your proposal.
2 mars à 11 h 23
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,832
Mentions "j'aime": 8,854
Quoting: CD282
Frederic in not an upgrade on Foegele, and Merkulov isn't an upgrade on Holloway. What is the 1st for?


Frederic is better than Foeggle and has term.
cody_tugak et beantownboy17 a aimé ceci.
2 mars à 11 h 23
#8
Démarrer sujet
Mr.T 17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,791
Mentions "j'aime": 338
Quoting: CD282
Frederic in not an upgrade on Foegele, and Merkulov isn't an upgrade on Holloway. What is the 1st for?


I just thought that we need more grit in the middle six and a scoring winger for drai or mcd so I thought that Fredrick and Merk would fix that, the first can become a second if it makes it more fair
2 mars à 14 h 50
#9
BostonBoy17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 633
Mentions "j'aime": 193
Quoting: CD282
Frederic in not an upgrade on Foegele, and Merkulov isn't an upgrade on Holloway. What is the 1st for?


Frederic and Foegele are nearly identical in terms of production and p/gp for their career (Foegele has 0.027 more ppg which translates to 2 points a season). Only Foegele hasn't gotten better over the last 4 years and Frederic has. 1st is for potential. Would love to check back in 5 years and see how they both progress.
4 mars à 14 h 58
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,086
Mentions "j'aime": 7,771
Quoting: Gofnut999
Frederic is better than Foeggle and has term.


Quoting: beantownboy17
Frederic and Foegele are nearly identical in terms of production and p/gp for their career (Foegele has 0.027 more ppg which translates to 2 points a season). Only Foegele hasn't gotten better over the last 4 years and Frederic has. 1st is for potential. Would love to check back in 5 years and see how they both progress.

That's an interesting take. Here are their 5v5 P/60 for the past 3 years:

Frederic
21-22: 1.66
22-23: 1.97 (+0.31)
23-24: 2.46 (+0.49)

Foegele
21-22: 1.38
22-23: 2.09 (+0.71)
23-24: 2.35 (+0.26)

So between this year and last Foegele has increased his point production by +0.97 P/60, or 70%. Frederic has increased his point production by +0.80 P/60, or 48%.

Past 2 years combined:
Foegele: 2.21 P/60 (78.57 IPP)
Frederic: 2.20 P/60 (69.32 IPP)

So I stand by my original statement: Frederic is not an upgrade on Foegele.
cody_tugak et beantownboy17 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage