SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Seravalli confirmed NYR cant get Tarasenko retained

Créé par: Rags21
Équipe: 2023-24 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 1 mars 2024
Publié: 1 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
OTT
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
Tarasenko to NYR is officially dead. They need him retained and it’s against the rules
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de MIN
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2026
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $79 204 083 $610 892 $582 500 $4 295 917 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
846 667 $846 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
820 000 $820 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 872 000 $3 872 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance100 000 $$100K)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
812 500 $812 500 $
DG
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 437 500 $4 437 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 mars à 9 h 19
#1
Joe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 7,678
Mentions "j'aime": 5,600
4 team trade -- Two retainers, Ottawa, and NYR. Simple, really.
1 mars à 9 h 26
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,273
Mentions "j'aime": 2,303
Quoting: JoeROFLCOPTER
4 team trade -- Two retainers, Ottawa, and NYR. Simple, really.


Tarasenko cannot be retained at all by anyone and traded to the rangers

He has to be at full cap or not at all
1 mars à 9 h 30
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,451
Mentions "j'aime": 18,440
Interesting. It’s been a full year since last trade, he is on a new contract….I figured it would have been allowed.
1 mars à 9 h 42
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,273
Mentions "j'aime": 2,303
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Interesting. It’s been a full year since last trade, he is on a new contract….I figured it would have been allowed.


I think it’s because he was on the ranger’s reserve list until 6/30 then walked at free agency

The CBA wording seems like it pertains to the player, and not the contract itself. So in other words, it doesn’t matter that it’s a new contract because it’s a the same player who was on the Rangers roster until 6/30 and obviously hasn’t been 365 days
NHLfan10506, BFN36NYR et ricochetii a aimé ceci.
1 mars à 9 h 46
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,838
Mentions "j'aime": 908
They can still trade for him at full cap hit but then they cannot do anything else.
1 mars à 10 h 7
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,273
Mentions "j'aime": 2,303
Quoting: hero9154
They can still trade for him at full cap hit but then they cannot do anything else.


Exactly why I don’t think they’ll do it. Drury definitely wants to add 2-3 players and Tarasenko would ruin that
hero9154 a aimé ceci.
1 mars à 10 h 10
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,838
Mentions "j'aime": 908
Quoting: Rags21
Exactly why I don’t think they’ll do it. Drury definitely wants to add 2-3 players and Tarasenko would ruin that


Yeah, the only center they could add if they got Tarasenko at $5M AAV would be Novak and that will not happen as Nashville is currently in a playoff position.
Rags21 a aimé ceci.
1 mars à 10 h 37
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 175
Mentions "j'aime": 149
Quoting: Rags21
I think it’s because he was on the ranger’s reserve list until 6/30 then walked at free agency

The CBA wording seems like it pertains to the player, and not the contract itself. So in other words, it doesn’t matter that it’s a new contract because it’s a the same player who was on the Rangers roster until 6/30 and obviously hasn’t been 365 days


The wording in the CBA is calendar year, which the nhl considers to end right before free agency, so you are correct.
1 mars à 11 h 12
#9
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,091
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Interesting. It’s been a full year since last trade, he is on a new contract….I figured it would have been allowed.


It is something with the potential for abuse even if the intent isn't there in this situation.
You can't "keep" your own UFA's at less than market value this way.

In spirit, it is fine. There was obviously no intent to circumvent the cap here. Ottawa expected to contend and NY didn't expect Tarasenko to be available.
The problem is that the rules have to apply regardless of whether the motives were pure, otherwise other teams can use it as precedent for "shadier" transactions.
NHLfan10506 a aimé ceci.
1 mars à 11 h 13
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,273
Mentions "j'aime": 2,303
Quoting: ricochetii
It is something with the potential for abuse even if the intent isn't there in this situation.
You can't "keep" your own UFA's at less than market value this way.

In spirit, it is fine. There was obviously no intent to circumvent the cap here. Ottawa expected to contend and NY didn't expect Tarasenko to be available.
The problem is that the rules have to apply regardless of whether the motives were pure, otherwise other teams can use it as precedent for "shadier" transactions.


I think it’s also the reason why the rangers didn’t add Motte again last year and was the whole Canes/Deangelo debacle
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage