No of course not... I'm not an idiot but Jarvis is the much more complete player and he has a lot of potential

Thats great. Jarvis and a 2nd does not land you Brady.

I haven't said a word about Brady's trade value or about what the OP posted. What I'm saying is I don't think it would be in the Canes best interest to make a deal for Brady Tkachuk centered around Jarvis.

I agree. The trade would be way more than this and it would not end up being worth it.

Brady
Year 1 - 71 GP 45P
Year 2 - 71 GP 44P
Year 3 - 56 GP 36P

Jarvis
Year 1 - 68 GP 40P (Playoffs 14GP 8P)
Year 2 - 82 GP 39P (Playoffs 15GP 10P)
Year 3 - 59 GP* 47 P* (*and counting)

Yes, Brady took a jump between year 3 and 4 as he matured physically and while we can't forecast the future, there is no logical reason to assume that Jarvis won't continue to improve as he develops.

We could take a look at their playoff performances, well actually....

I'm not suggesting that Brady doesn't hold more value than Jarvis but it's not as outlandish as some of you make it. Contracts & roster construction also play a large role in determining 'value' hence the Canes refusal to part with Jarvis in a package for Timo Meier last year.