SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who says no

Créé par: Turkish_Canuck
Équipe: 2023-24 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 26 févr. 2024
Publié: 26 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Trade takes place Summer 2024.
Petey signs 8x$12million
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2026
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $81 697 084 $850 000 $925 000 $1 802 916 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
816 667 $816 667 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
Who says no?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


26 févr. à 10 h 1
#1
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,559
Mentions "j'aime": 3,348
The devils do. Take out Luke Hughes and the devils still say no
BUFF742 a aimé ceci.
26 févr. à 10 h 12
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 2,226
Mentions "j'aime": 1,272
Quoting: dgibb10
The devils do. Take out Luke Hughes and the devils still say no


Well then they're insane
Turkish_Canuck a aimé ceci.
26 févr. à 10 h 18
#3
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,559
Mentions "j'aime": 3,348
Quoting: mmccRed198913
Well then they're insane


4 million dollars a year is a massive amount of money.

1st and a quality prospect doesn’t cover it to get the younger, cheaper, imo better player
26 févr. à 10 h 20
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 2,226
Mentions "j'aime": 1,272
Quoting: dgibb10
4 million dollars a year is a massive amount of money.

1st and a quality prospect doesn’t cover it to get the younger, cheaper, imo better player


Watching the Devils yesterday there was a whole lotta floating going on. You don't get that with EP and he puts up points.
Turkish_Canuck a aimé ceci.
26 févr. à 10 h 22
#5
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,559
Mentions "j'aime": 3,348
Quoting: mmccRed198913
Watching the Devils yesterday there was a whole lotta floating going on. You don't get that with EP and he puts up points.


I’d much rather have Jack.

Pettersson hadn’t had a season above a PPG until he was 24. Jack is still 22
26 févr. à 10 h 27
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 2,226
Mentions "j'aime": 1,272
Quoting: dgibb10
I’d much rather have Jack.

Pettersson hadn’t had a season above a PPG until he was 24. Jack is still 22


That's fair. Not a perfect comparison but being a Red Wing fan. I always rather had Datsyuk than Crosby, not saying either one is comparable to EP/Hughes respectively. I just liked the guy that played at both ends of the ice.
26 févr. à 10 h 41
#7
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,559
Mentions "j'aime": 3,348
Quoting: mmccRed198913
That's fair. Not a perfect comparison but being a Red Wing fan. I always rather had Datsyuk than Crosby, not saying either one is comparable to EP/Hughes respectively. I just liked the guy that played at both ends of the ice.


Jack Hughes has been better defensively than Pettersson this year. (Pettersson’s defensive play this year and in general is incredibly overrated, and Jacks is incredibly underrated).

But Pettersson got a narrative around him (people associate killing penalties and winning faceoffs with being good defensively bc defensive play is very difficult to isolate)

And because Jack is small and doesn’t win faceoffs and doesn’t throw #hits, people assume he isn’t good defensively.
26 févr. à 13 h 59
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,361
Mentions "j'aime": 593
Quoting: dgibb10
Jack Hughes has been better defensively than Pettersson this year. (Pettersson’s defensive play this year and in general is incredibly overrated, and Jacks is incredibly underrated).

But Pettersson got a narrative around him (people associate killing penalties and winning faceoffs with being good defensively bc defensive play is very difficult to isolate)

And because Jack is small and doesn’t win faceoffs and doesn’t throw #hits, people assume he isn’t good defensively.


What? Pettersson has a borderline selke level two way game while producing 100 points, Hughes is average defensively and puts up the same offensive numbers. At worst they’d be a wash in trade value because of Hughes’ contract but there’s a good argument that it would take Hughes + to acquire Petey.
Turkish_Canuck a aimé ceci.
26 févr. à 14 h 44
#9
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,559
Mentions "j'aime": 3,348
Quoting: Aasen6
What? Pettersson has a borderline selke level two way game while producing 100 points, Hughes is average defensively and puts up the same offensive numbers. At worst they’d be a wash in trade value because of Hughes’ contract but there’s a good argument that it would take Hughes + to acquire Petey.


Pettersson's defense is so incredibly overrated. Been worse defensively than Jack this year

At best case you could argue right now pettersson is worth 1 mill AAV more today (it's virtually equal with a slight edge to jack). And then you realize jack is 22 and still developing. And then you realize Jack will cost 4-5 mill AAV less.

Reminder that pettersson didn't crack a PPG until age 24. Jack is currently 22
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage