SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Whats the price

Créé par: TheOntarioBruin05
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 19 févr. 2024
Publié: 19 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
BOS
    What could the b's get in return for merk if there's no room in the lineup for him this off-season?
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    2025
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    2026
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2283 500 000 $83 353 334 $4 500 000 $80 000 $146 666 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
    AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    775 000 $775 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    787 500 $787 500 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    DG
    NTC, NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 475 000 $3 475 000 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
    C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    19 févr. à 23 h 57
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 3,895
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
    Modifié 20 févr. à 0 h 13
    Forbort and Merkulov for Anthony Duclair with no retention makes some sense.

    Maybe Merkulov becomes like Zetterland with more of an opportunity. He’s certainly been very productive in the AHL and his shot translates as does his ability to set position on the left side of the net.

    You could likely flip Forbort with retention if you chose to
    TheOntarioBruin05 a aimé ceci.
    20 févr. à 1 h 6
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 11,284
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
    Quoting: Celtics21
    Forbort and Merkulov for Anthony Duclair with no retention makes some sense.

    Maybe Merkulov becomes like Zetterland with more of an opportunity. He’s certainly been very productive in the AHL and his shot translates as does his ability to set position on the left side of the net.

    You could likely flip Forbort with retention if you chose to


    No on Forbort, just because sharks have too many LD and Mukhamadulin needs a chance next year.

    Duclair for Merk and 4th?
    TheOntarioBruin05 a aimé ceci.
    20 févr. à 1 h 25
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 3,895
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
    Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
    No on Forbort, just because sharks have too many LD and Mukhamadulin needs a chance next year.

    Duclair for Merk and 4th?


    I’d probably consider that with 50 percent retention though part of me wonders if he’s any better than other options
    TheOntarioBruin05 a aimé ceci.
    20 févr. à 3 h 36
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 11,284
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
    Quoting: Celtics21
    I’d probably consider that with 50 percent retention though part of me wonders if he’s any better than other options


    50% retention would Cary a much steeper price! Mainly because that’s the Sharks only retention slot left.
    20 févr. à 3 h 53
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 3,895
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
    Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
    50% retention would Cary a much steeper price! Mainly because that’s the Sharks only retention slot left.


    That’s why I offered Forbort plus Merkulov who is in the last year of his contract without retention. I’m not super enthusiastic about Duclair at this stage of his career but he can score some goals. I’d rather give Lysell a shot, but I think Montgomery might want a vet
    TheOntarioBruin05 a aimé ceci.
    20 févr. à 4 h 3
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 11,284
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
    Quoting: Celtics21
    That’s why I offered Forbort plus Merkulov who is in the last year of his contract without retention. I’m not super enthusiastic about Duclair at this stage of his career but he can score some goals. I’d rather give Lysell a shot, but I think Montgomery might want a vet


    He is still only 28 not 38. And I can understand your position, but a LD is a hard no, we just have too many already plus more on their way.
    TheOntarioBruin05 a aimé ceci.
    20 févr. à 4 h 22
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 3,895
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
    Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
    He is still only 28 not 38. And I can understand your position, but a LD is a hard no, we just have too many already plus more on their way.


    It’s not like you couldn’t bury him in San Jose or trade him to another team. I’m just stating a simple fact about the cap. I would have ZERO interest in Duclair at $3m
    TheOntarioBruin05 a aimé ceci.
    20 févr. à 8 h 28
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 11,510
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
    Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
    No on Forbort, just because sharks have too many LD and Mukhamadulin needs a chance next year.

    Duclair for Merk and 4th?


    Forbort is a pending UFA. He'd have no impact on Mukhamadulin getting a chance next year.
    TheOntarioBruin05 a aimé ceci.
    20 févr. à 13 h 35
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 11,284
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
    Quoting: Celtics21
    It’s not like you couldn’t bury him in San Jose or trade him to another team. I’m just stating a simple fact about the cap. I would have ZERO interest in Duclair at $3m


    Why? If your arguing he’s a cap dump then it’s and even harder no and if he has value burying him would kill that. Trade him somewhere else.
    20 févr. à 13 h 36
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 11,284
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
    Quoting: ON3M4N
    Forbort is a pending UFA. He'd have no impact on Mukhamadulin getting a chance next year.


    Then why do we take him on?
    20 févr. à 13 h 43
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 3,895
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
    Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
    Why? If your arguing he’s a cap dump then it’s and even harder no and if he has value burying him would kill that. Trade him somewhere else.


    I don’t have any interest in Duclair at $3m. Certainly not giving a Merkulov for him. Trying to give you an option to balance out the salaries and offering a good prospect whose performing extremely well at the the AHL level instead of a mid round pick.

    If San Jose trades him to a contender, you are taking a salary back or retaining. Period. Not sure why this is an issue.
    20 févr. à 13 h 48
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 11,284
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
    Quoting: Celtics21
    I don’t have any interest in Duclair at $3m. Certainly not giving a Merkulov for him. Trying to give you an option to balance out the salaries and offering a good prospect whose performing ant the AHL level instead of a mid round pick. You trade him to a contender, you are taking a salary back or retaining. Period. Not sure why this is an issue.


    That’s a fair assessment. I just don’t know enough about Merk to consider if this is valid or if we’re just getting an AHL scorer who doesn’t have any real NHL projections or not!
    21 févr. à 8 h 49
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 11,510
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
    Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
    Then why do we take him on?


    No idea, I didn't propose the offer. The best path would be to flip him to a contender looking to improve their PK. Seeing as SJ has a retention slot, they could retain some for the last few months of the season and improve their return. With no retention I'd think he can get a 4th. If SJ wanted to retain then they could get a 3rd for him.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage