SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline targets

Créé par: smokewiseganja
Équipe: 2023-24 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 18 févr. 2024
Publié: 18 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Eberle, Jordan (2 750 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
SEA
  1. Janmark, Mattias
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
2.
EDM
  1. Carrier, Alexandre
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
NSH
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Wanner, Maximus
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
3.
EDM
  1. Fleury, Marc-André (1 750 000 $ retained)
MIN
  1. Kemp, Philip
  2. Pickard, Calvin
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
4.
EDM
  1. Bjugstad, Nick (1 050 000 $ retained)
ARI
  1. Bourgault, Xavier
  2. Brown, Connor
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SEA
Logo de EDM
Logo de NSH
Logo de DAL
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2026
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2083 500 000 $84 129 167 $850 000 $975 000 $-629 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance325 000 $$325K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 févr. à 16 h 56
#1
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
The Minnesota and Arizona trades aren't necessary and I think Wanner is too steep a price to pay for how slight an upgrade Carrier is over Ceci.

The price to upgrade over Pickard isn't worth how little Edmonton actually gets via upgrade (Fleury is a downgrade with too many miles and almost 3x the cap hit). I don't understand what everyone enjoyed about Bjugstad last year as I recall his time in Orange and Blue to be wholly lacklustre (he was actually a boat anchor in the playoffs). I'm not paying assets to bring him back and would rather pay the price on Dowd.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
18 févr. à 17 h 0
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 2,844
Mentions "j'aime": 834
AZ easy pass, B+ W prospect (AZ is deepest at W), maybe the worst W in the NHL (yeah rental but), and a 3rd in 3years for vet middle C under contract next year.
18 févr. à 17 h 30
#3
Démarrer sujet
Smokewise Ganja
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,281
Mentions "j'aime": 306
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
The Minnesota and Arizona trades aren't necessary and I think Wanner is too steep a price to pay for how slight an upgrade Carrier is over Ceci.

The price to upgrade over Pickard isn't worth how little Edmonton actually gets via upgrade (Fleury is a downgrade with too many miles and almost 3x the cap hit). I don't understand what everyone enjoyed about Bjugstad last year as I recall his time in Orange and Blue to be wholly lacklustre (he was actually a boat anchor in the playoffs). I'm not paying assets to bring him back and would rather pay the price on Dowd.


Carrier is a massive, massive upgrade over Ceci. I don’t know what you’ve seen from Ceci to suggest otherwise
18 févr. à 17 h 31
#4
Démarrer sujet
Smokewise Ganja
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,281
Mentions "j'aime": 306
Quoting: bwhsocal
AZ easy pass, B+ W prospect (AZ is deepest at W), maybe the worst W in the NHL (yeah rental but), and a 3rd in 3years for vet middle C under contract next year.


Bourgault is C/W, so that point is moot. It’s essentially a 2nd and a 3rd here, I’d say that’s worth it for a 3rd liner at 1 mil
18 févr. à 17 h 38
#5
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
Quoting: smokewiseganja
Carrier is a massive, massive upgrade over Ceci. I don’t know what you’ve seen from Ceci to suggest otherwise


Carrier's a better puck mover and a bit of a better skater but there's a very minor difference in their ability to defend. Would I include Ceci in a deal for Carrier? Yes. My original point stands however as I still think Wanner is too much to pay for such a minor discrepancy in who is/isn't effective.

I'm only moving Akey and/or Wanner for a veritable upgrade with term. Someone like Andersson.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
18 févr. à 17 h 52
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 2,844
Mentions "j'aime": 834
Quoting: smokewiseganja
Bourgault is C/W, so that point is moot. It’s essentially a 2nd and a 3rd here, I’d say that’s worth it for a 3rd liner at 1 mil


i dont know if AHLer F w 6G/10A/43games is worthy of a 2nd round pick, brown is not wanted at all and the 3rd is 15yo now (not helping team for years). this is easy pass, if Bjug was UFA then fine but he is not.
22 févr. à 12 h 58
#7
Démarrer sujet
Smokewise Ganja
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,281
Mentions "j'aime": 306
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
Carrier's a better puck mover and a bit of a better skater but there's a very minor difference in their ability to defend. Would I include Ceci in a deal for Carrier? Yes. My original point stands however as I still think Wanner is too much to pay for such a minor discrepancy in who is/isn't effective.

I'm only moving Akey and/or Wanner for a veritable upgrade with term. Someone like Andersson.


Dude there’s a massive difference in their ability to defense lol
22 févr. à 13 h 15
#8
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
Quoting: smokewiseganja
Dude there’s a massive difference in their ability to defense lol


Statistically, there's little difference. The numbers do favour Carrier ever so slightly and he's getting more goaltender support from Saros than Ceci is from Skinner, but it's not a night-and-day comparison.

I would like Edmonton to acquire Carrier. I think if Holland could make the cap work that keeping Ceci as the #3RD would be a very prudent move. I'm not interested in hedging two quality assets to make that minor of an upgrade though. Give Nashville a first instead: it's very likely that once Desharnais walks and Kemp's current deal expires, Wanner is going to have every chance to be the #3RD for Edmonton. There's still going to be a massive need for cheap quality RFA deals once we hit 2025-26.

It's fine if you're just tired of watching Ceci play but you don't need to make things up.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage