Modifié 16 févr. à 1 h 15
Quoting: mv21227
Zero chance you’re getting that much for Markstrom and Tanev
Quoting: Silent_Warrior
That might be enough for you to get Markstrom; but definitely not Markstrom and Tanev.
The retention definitely needs to be rethought, Tanev's is fine, but obviously, based on the failed deal that maybe almost materialized, Conroy is not a fan of retaining on Markstrom. He could be persuaded with a piece like Nemec involved, but not 50% for dang sure, and any retention would cost the Devils more.
But in all honesty, Daws isn't a bad goaltending option to hang with Wolf in the future, maybe? ... Holtz, a 1st, a 2nd, and Nemec would be pretty nice adds to Calgary's re-tool.
If the rumored asking price for Tanev is roughly a 2nd round pick-ish at the moment, perhaps a not too substantial plus, then, in this scenario, you're basically looking at Nemec, Holtz and a 1st for Markstrom, and a 2nd and Daws for Tanev. That looks like a pretty good return to me, retention adjustments pending! And in all honesty, since Calgary won't accept 50% retention on Markstrom, the Devils probably wouldn't part with all of Nemec, Holtz, Daws and their 1st for a few months of Tanev and the couple years of Markstrom.