SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline moves

Créé par: ChiHawk
Équipe: 2023-24 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 29 janv. 2024
Publié: 29 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Akey, Beau
  2. Campbell, Jack
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (NYR)
2.
CHI
  1. Johansen, Ryan
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (COL)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (COL)
COL
  1. Johnson, Tyler (2 500 000 $ retained)
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Beauvillier, Anthony (2 000 000 $ retained)
4.
VAN
  1. Blackwell, Colin
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2026 (OTT)
5.
CHI
  1. Niemelä, Topi
  2. Samsonov, Ilya
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Murphy, Connor
  2. Raddysh, Taylor
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (COL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de COL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2583 500 000 $82 615 124 $0 $5 945 000 $884 876 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance505 000 $$505K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
856 667 $856 667 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 janv. à 21 h 29
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 438
Mentions "j'aime": 120
Quoting: ChiHawk
Well the Leafs d sucks so Murphy would be easily better than everyone besides Reilly


Dont know if thats true either, its less a personnel issue for the leafs and more a structure issue.
30 janv. à 11 h 5
#27
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,189
Mentions "j'aime": 9,540
Quoting: justinhollfan3
Dont know if thats true either, its less a personnel issue for the leafs and more a structure issue.


And Murphy brings that very physical stay at home defender the Leafs need and would pair up great with Reilly as such. The problem right now with Murphy on the Hawks, is he's being asked to do everything.
30 janv. à 13 h 40
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 438
Mentions "j'aime": 120
Quoting: ChiHawk
And Murphy brings that very physical stay at home defender the Leafs need and would pair up great with Reilly as such. The problem right now with Murphy on the Hawks, is he's being asked to do everything.


I wouldnt be opposed to him but a 1st and niemela is pretty steep for us especially with no retention. He doesnt move the needle for us that much.
30 janv. à 13 h 51
#29
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,189
Mentions "j'aime": 9,540
Quoting: justinhollfan3
I wouldnt be opposed to him but a 1st and niemela is pretty steep for us especially with no retention. He doesnt move the needle for us that much.


But your dumping Sammy's crap deal, and getting Raddysh who's an RFA.

Raddysh + 4th = Niemela
Murphy = Sammy cap dump + late 1st

The math isn't far off. Murphy alone is worth a 2nd and 3rd, add the Sammy cap dump and he's worth the late 1st
31 janv. à 11 h 37
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 438
Mentions "j'aime": 120
Quoting: ChiHawk
But your dumping Sammy's crap deal, and getting Raddysh who's an RFA.

Raddysh + 4th = Niemela
Murphy = Sammy cap dump + late 1st

The math isn't far off. Murphy alone is worth a 2nd and 3rd, add the Sammy cap dump and he's worth the late 1st


Yeah but i dont think samsonov gets moved anymore is the thing, he seems to have found his legs
31 janv. à 11 h 55
#31
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,189
Mentions "j'aime": 9,540
Quoting: justinhollfan3
Yeah but i dont think samsonov gets moved anymore is the thing, he seems to have found his legs


He has had only 3 good games (one of those games only facing 17 shots) out of 4 coming back from injury with the first game posting a .870%. WAY WAY to small of a sample size against the season. For the season in 19 games he has a .878%. He currently is ranked 82nd in the league based on save % and 69th in goals against average. He's been awful and 3 good games isn't enough to change that and only suggests those are an outlier. String together 7 to 10 good games and than there's a narrative behind what you are saying.
31 janv. à 12 h 14
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 438
Mentions "j'aime": 120
Quoting: ChiHawk
He has had only 3 good games (one of those games only facing 17 shots) out of 4 coming back from injury with the first game posting a .870%. WAY WAY to small of a sample size against the season. For the season in 19 games he has a .878%. He currently is ranked 82nd in the league based on save % and 69th in goals against average. He's been awful and 3 good games isn't enough to change that and only suggests those are an outlier. String together 7 to 10 good games and than there's a narrative behind what you are saying.


I mean a lot of what you said isn't true, Samsonov was not injured, he was in the minors doing a conditioning stint. His game with the .870% was actually a very well played game by him but our defense was very bad all game, I agree he hasnt been good over the whole season but hes starting to get something going and either way we wouldnt pay a 1st for a one year contract to be dumped especially since this season appears to be going nowhere for us anyways
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
31 janv. à 12 h 15
#33
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,189
Mentions "j'aime": 9,540
Quoting: justinhollfan3
I mean a lot of what you said isn't true, Samsonov was not injured, he was in the minors doing a conditioning stint. His game with the .870% was actually a very well played game by him but our defense was very bad all game, I agree he hasnt been good over the whole season but hes starting to get something going and either way we wouldnt pay a 1st for a one year contract to be dumped especially since this season appears to be going nowhere for us anyways


To be clear, it's not a 1st to dump Sammy. It's a 1st to acquire Murphy AND dump Sammy to create the cap space.
justinhollfan3 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage