SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

D and Depth

Créé par: PurpleHippo
Équipe: 2023-24 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 26 janv. 2024
Publié: 26 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Carrier would need to come with a reasonable extension in place.
Transactions
NSH
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Janmark, Mattias
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2026
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $83 274 167 $850 000 $4 200 000 $225 833 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 225 000 $$3M)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
807 500 $807 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance325 000 $$325K)
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 janv. à 17 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,284
Mentions "j'aime": 357
Easy no for the oilers why are we paying 1st and 2nd to downgrade the D lmao for minor upgrades on Offence this is a great example of terrible asset management
26 janv. à 17 h 24
#2
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,846
Mentions "j'aime": 1,221
At this point I honestly don't think Carrier is much of a upgrade on Ceci (unless Carrier is having a monster year that I don't know about), I agree we need to upgrade on Ceci but I think we can do better. I'd rather trade for Sissons over Novak, he would come much cheaper and would be a more effective piece. I feel like we overpay a bit here for a couple players we could do better on
26 janv. à 17 h 27
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 233
Modifié 26 janv. à 17 h 33
Quoting: Oilers_29
Easy no for the oilers why are we paying 1st and 2nd to downgrade the D lmao for minor upgrades on Offence this is a great example of terrible asset management


I don't think you know who Carrier is but I'll ignore that portion (I am prepared for the TOI comparison though).

EDM should be prioritizing an upgrade on Ceci and a little more forward depth IMO, may not end up being this trade but I would hope for a trade like this.
26 janv. à 17 h 32
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 233
Quoting: NucksnOilers
At this point I honestly don't think Carrier is much of a upgrade on Ceci (unless Carrier is having a monster year that I don't know about), I agree we need to upgrade on Ceci but I think we can do better. I'd rather trade for Sissons over Novak, he would come much cheaper and would be a more effective piece. I feel like we overpay a bit here for a couple players we could do better on


Carrier brings a lot of puck movement and a bit better defending than Ceci, maybe something others dont value as they want a true defensive Dman with Nurse (I just really dont).
Also, Coffey has talked about the importance of being a puck mover and Carrier fits that description, most defensive Dmen I seen thrown around on this site in EDM ACGMs dont.

Novak is mostly due to his cap hit, he is an upgrade for our bottom 6 and may slot in well between Holloway/Kane or Holloway/Cloud, 100% see Sissons being more a fit in our bottom 6 if the cap would work.

The 1st being included is cause it's likely the price that would need to be paid, but Holland wouldn't trade for rentals so I included "extension in place".
NucksnOilers et SwarmChair a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 17 h 37
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,284
Mentions "j'aime": 357
Quoting: PurpleHippo
I don't think you know who Carrier is but I'll ignore that portion (I am prepared for the TOI comparison though).

EDM should be prioritizing an upgrade on Ceci and a little more forward depth IMO, may not end up being this trade but I would hope for a trade like this.

Why do you think carrier is better cause he’s not lmao he plays bottom pairing minutes which significantly easier than what Ceci plays against. Novak isn’t gonna produce the same as he does on Nashville cause he will play the 4C on limited minutes it’s just not worth it for Edmonton. This is a prime example of bad asset management I’m not trying to be dick but it’s true
26 janv. à 17 h 43
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,284
Mentions "j'aime": 357
Quoting: PurpleHippo
I don't think you know who Carrier is but I'll ignore that portion (I am prepared for the TOI comparison though).

EDM should be prioritizing an upgrade on Ceci and a little more forward depth IMO, may not end up being this trade but I would hope for a trade like this.


Also carrier is 175 5’10 he isn’t the style of defensemen that holland is looking for. He has less playoff experience then desharneis and at this point I don’t really see him as an upgrade over desharneis with the way he’s playing this year
SwarmChair a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 17 h 45
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 233
Quoting: Oilers_29
Why do you think carrier is better cause he’s not lmao he plays bottom pairing minutes which significantly easier than what Ceci plays against. Novak isn’t gonna produce the same as he does on Nashville cause he will play the 4C on limited minutes it’s just not worth it for Edmonton. This is a prime example of bad asset management I’m not trying to be dick but it’s true


He is actually the highest minute RD on Nashville rn, not sure where you got bottom minute pairing from?
and again, don't think you watch or know anything in regards to him so where are you getting that analysis from?

I like Ceci, if you disagree with this trade thats fine but I do see Carrier as an upgrade atm who is younger and will likely be about the same price.
Novak would likely slot in at the 3rd line, what he brings is fine for that position.
SwarmChair a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 17 h 52
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,284
Mentions "j'aime": 357
Quoting: PurpleHippo
He is actually the highest minute RD on Nashville rn, not sure where you got bottom minute pairing from?
and again, don't think you watch or know anything in regards to him so where are you getting that analysis from?

I like Ceci, if you disagree with this trade thats fine but I do see Carrier as an upgrade atm who is younger and will likely be about the same price.
Novak would likely slot in at the 3rd line, what he brings is fine for that position.

Well I mean he plays on the 3rd pair so I would assume he plays bottom pairing minutes and he definitely isn’t the best RD on that team and he isn’t the style of defensmen holland is looking for holland is looking for a veteran defensemen with actual playoff experience not minimal experience and someone that’s over 6Ft 200Ibs not 175 5’10
SwarmChair a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 18 h 2
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,284
Mentions "j'aime": 357
Quoting: PurpleHippo
He is actually the highest minute RD on Nashville rn, not sure where you got bottom minute pairing from?
and again, don't think you watch or know anything in regards to him so where are you getting that analysis from?

I like Ceci, if you disagree with this trade thats fine but I do see Carrier as an upgrade atm who is younger and will likely be about the same price.
Novak would likely slot in at the 3rd line, what he brings is fine for that position.


According to money puck Ceci is ranked 133rd for best defensemen 5 on 5 this year carrier was nowhere to be found on the list cause he’s not as good and didn’t even crack the top 300 I’m not gonna list all the numbers why Ceci is better cause you can do that on ur own time
sammy1414 a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 18 h 7
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 567
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Stop it with the Ceci trades! Oilers are on a 15 game winning streak with Ceci in the lineup
Oilers_29 a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 18 h 29
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 233
Quoting: Oilers_29
According to money puck Ceci is ranked 133rd for best defensemen 5 on 5 this year carrier was nowhere to be found on the list cause he’s not as good and didn’t even crack the top 300 I’m not gonna list all the numbers why Ceci is better cause you can do that on ur own time


Across what category did you look at for that stat?
26 janv. à 19 h 7
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 5,341
Mentions "j'aime": 3,416
Quoting: Oilers_29
According to money puck Ceci is ranked 133rd for best defensemen 5 on 5 this year carrier was nowhere to be found on the list cause he’s not as good and didn’t even crack the top 300 I’m not gonna list all the numbers why Ceci is better cause you can do that on ur own time


Ranked 133😭😭 how far did you scroll down bruh

Oilers can keep Ceci. We’ve been over this, he sucks
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage