SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Keep track of the future

Créé par: GrittyGucci
Équipe: 2023-24 Flyers de Philadelphie
Date de création initiale: 10 janv. 2024
Publié: 10 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Couple other details
- Poehling signs a 2 yr extension at 1.75-2 mil
- Tippet signs a 4 yr extension at 4.5 mil

Lightning Fans I just put a first in for a placeholder, what do you deem ample for the two players? A second - 3rd - some mid prospect would also suffice in that ballpark imo.

The Winnipeg trade is comprised like this:
Schimdt - Zihlkin - 4th for 6 mil in cap space
1st for walker/seeler

Oilers trade is based on the mindset they are all in, and broberg will not be apart of the run. I got the second for Frost now being valued for 1 mil, which can be great value with his playmaking ability.
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (TBL)
Détails additionnels:
To me, two teams that could trade for both (depending very much on playoff position) is winnipeg and tampa. If tampa finds itself third in the division or greater, I can see them making this move. Likely one last hoorah with stamkos, especially given how the contract negotiations have gone. But of the two, this is the least likely.
TBL
    Walker 50% retained and Seeler
    2.
    PHI
    1. Schmidt, Nate
    2. Zhilkin, Danil
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
    4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
    Détails additionnels:
    This seems like the probable trade. Schimdt has been less than desired at his near 6 mil cap hit, but given the flyers status of a rebuilder, it wouldn't be the end of the world since he's on the books for another year. This would also given winnipeg a whopping 6 mil to work with this coming offseason. Schmidt in my eyes would take over a staal like role in the 24-25 season.
    WPG
    1. Seeler, Nick
    2. Walker, Sean (1 325 000 $ retained)
    3.
    PHI
    1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
    FLA
    1. Staal, Marc
    Détails additionnels:
    Familiar with the system, good depth option.
    4.
    PHI
    1. Broberg, Philip
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
    EDM
    1. Frost, Morgan (1 050 000 $ retained)
    2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (CAR)
    Détails additionnels:
    I am unsure of the value, but I believe frost would slot in perfectly on the 3C with edmonton, and would match the high flying offensive style they have in contrast to philly. Broberg is thrown in because both players are in less than desirable situations, and the pick is due to the retention over a two year period.
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de STL
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de PHI
    2025
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    2026
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2283 500 000 $86 638 762 $1 187 500 $1 307 500 $-3 138 762 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    863 333 $863 333 $
    AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
    831 667 $831 667 $
    C
    RFA - 4
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    3 979 000 $3 979 000 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
    5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    10 janv. à 9 h 52
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 16,238
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,214
    No from Winnipeg. They have no need or use for either Flyer at that cost.

    Winnipeg has no need to move Schmidt and nothing coming from Philly is worth giving up a 1st for
    CanMerc et CF18GM a aimé ceci.
    10 janv. à 9 h 54
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2023
    Messages: 134
    Mentions "j'aime": 101
    Fair, if dropping the 1st to a second and fifth make a difference to you? I just view Schmidt as a negative asset and value cap space for obvious reasons. Correct me if I am wrong on Schmidt.
    10 janv. à 9 h 55
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2023
    Messages: 543
    Mentions "j'aime": 428
    Jets Decline
    We have zero need for either of those 2 players and we’re not trading a 1st for any deal that doesn’t return a player of need..2C
    This trade is just bad for WPG
    CF18GM a aimé ceci.
    10 janv. à 10 h 3
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 16,238
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,214
    Quoting: GrittyGucci
    Fair, if dropping the 1st to a second and fifth make a difference to you? I just view Schmidt as a negative asset and value cap space for obvious reasons. Correct me if I am wrong on Schmidt.


    Schmidt's contract does make him a negative asset, but he's playing well and his cap hit doesn't hurt the Jets, so there is no reason to move him unless it is for an upgrade, which neither Flyer is.
    CF18GM, GrittyGucci et CanMerc a aimé ceci.
    10 janv. à 10 h 11
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 661
    Mentions "j'aime": 432
    Quoting: GrittyGucci
    Fair, if dropping the 1st to a second and fifth make a difference to you? I just view Schmidt as a negative asset and value cap space for obvious reasons. Correct me if I am wrong on Schmidt.


    Disagree that Schmidt is a negative asset for the time being. WPG is not up against the cap and can even add at the TDL without moving Schmidt. As far as his play goes, he's been better as of late and I would honestly rather rely on him in the playoffs than either of our younger guys (Heinola/Chisholm).

    Should definitely move him come offseason tho.
    GrittyGucci et CanMerc a aimé ceci.
    10 janv. à 10 h 57
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2023
    Messages: 543
    Mentions "j'aime": 428
    Quoting: CF18GM
    Disagree that Schmidt is a negative asset for the time being. WPG is not up against the cap and can even add at the TDL without moving Schmidt. As far as his play goes, he's been better as of late and I would honestly rather rely on him in the playoffs than either of our younger guys (Heinola/Chisholm).

    Should definitely move him come offseason tho.

    I’d move him in a Lindholm deal, for cap space, but I also don’t see the reason to wait til the TDL to make trades… I’d deal for Lindholm now
    10 janv. à 13 h 39
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 661
    Mentions "j'aime": 432
    Quoting: CanMerc
    I’d move him in a Lindholm deal, for cap space, but I also don’t see the reason to wait til the TDL to make trades… I’d deal for Lindholm now


    More cap space at TDL. It would allow WPG to deal only futures for Lindholm and keep the core players intact (i.e. won't have to move Schmidt for cap space).
    10 janv. à 13 h 40
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2023
    Messages: 543
    Mentions "j'aime": 428
    Quoting: CF18GM
    More cap space at TDL. It would allow WPG to deal only futures for Lindholm and keep the core players intact.


    Schmidt is a core player, and doing the deal earlier gives the team more time to adjust to the change and build chemistry
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage